Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
What With Thrust Reverse Prior To Touchdown.  
User currently offlineRB211 From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 632 posts, RR: 3
Posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 4559 times:

Why do some airlines perform thrust reversal prior to touch down. I've seen several Russian aircraft perform it but have yet to see any European or American aircraft do it. Wouldn't that stress the landing gear when it hits the tarmac?


Airline photography. Whether they're fully clothed, butt naked, having issues or confused I'm taking pictures!!
21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAvioniker From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 1109 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 4512 times:

The only US built aircraft I know that can reverse in flight (without pulling certain breakers that shouldn't be pulled in flight) is the DC-8 and that's because it's really slick and that's the only way to make some of the approach points on speed.


One may educate the ignorance from the unknowing but stupid is forever. Boswell; ca: 1533
User currently offlineJBirdAV8r From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 4489 posts, RR: 21
Reply 2, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 4501 times:

To elaborate on what Avioniker said, it's also because the aircraft has no flight spoilers (only ground spoilers), and isn't it only the inboard engines that can be reversed in flight?

Also NASA's modified Gulfstream II Shuttle Training Aircraft can reverse in-flight; they are modified with different (727-style) reversers.



I got my head checked--by a jumbo jet
User currently offlineB747skipper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 4510 times:

The DC8 can use inboard engine reversers (Douglas name is "thrust brakes") in flight. The DC8 could not use their spoilers in flight... so like Avioniker said, the only way to slow down a DC8... is deploy inboard reversers...
xxx
The DC8 had a very low speed limit for flaps and gear extension (230 KIAS for both)... so when you were at say... 250, descending to intercept a glide slope and still no slowing down, especially with these CFM engines, the only way to slow down was the reversers... until you hit 230, then get the flaps...
xxx
Happy contrails  Smile
(s) Skipper


User currently offlineUSAFHummer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 10685 posts, RR: 53
Reply 4, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 4471 times:

Alas, to add a little bit on to JBird, the NASA Gulfstream is flown in a fashion that should not be attempted by a normal Gulfstream with steep dives at high speeds, hence the need for the reversers inflight...its like "do not try this at home kids"...

Greg



Chief A.net college football stadium self-pic guru
User currently offlineBroke From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 1322 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 4462 times:

The DC-8 is certified to use its inboard thrust reversers in flight, but using it inflight really reduces flap reliability due to the buffeting they receive. The -70's series with the high bypass engines aggravates the problem even more.

I have seem IL-62's on short final with the thrust reverser buckets on the outboard engines deployed. I think that the outboard engines are the only ones on the IL-62 with thrust reversers. I don't know the reason for deploying the buckets in flight. My guesses run from using them as a speed brake or slow deployment of the reversers on the ground.

Does anyone know for a fact why??


User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Reply 6, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 4316 times:

Doesn't reversing inflight risk a backflow up the tailpipe?


The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
User currently offlineScbriml From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 12462 posts, RR: 46
Reply 7, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 4290 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I have seem IL-62's on short final with the thrust reverser buckets on the outboard engines deployed

You mean like this:
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Brimley


 Smile



Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana!
User currently offlinePositive rate From Australia, joined Sep 2001, 2143 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 4290 times:

I recall reading somewhere Concorde could deploy reversers in flight too.

User currently offlineA/c train From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 501 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 4269 times:

It depends on the systm design aswell as crew demands, on some a/c, it needs air/grnd sensing for example, on older a/c a microswitch/proximity sensing on the undercarriage leg deployed speed brakes and reversers.
regards,
a/c


User currently offlineLZ-TLT From Germany, joined Apr 2001, 431 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 4199 times:

On the Il-62M, it is a standart procedure to use reversers prior to touchdown, and the 62 IS equipped with speedbrakes/spoilers. On both 62 design variants(62/62M the outboard engines are the only ones equipped with reversers). I think, it has to do with the slow spool-up rate and high idle trust on these engine types - the Kuznetzov NK-8-2 on the original Il-62 and the Solovjev D-30KU on the 62M. Also, the original 62 is equipped with cascade-type reversers while the (much more popular) 62M has the clamshells as shown on the photo

User currently offlineRB211 From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 632 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 4171 times:

That's what I was talking about (the picture)Scbriml. Hey guys thanks for clearing that up. I just looks really crazy.
Thanks lots!

P.S. "The next station is concourse E. Concourse E is your next station!"



Airline photography. Whether they're fully clothed, butt naked, having issues or confused I'm taking pictures!!
User currently offlineSovietjet From Bulgaria, joined Mar 2003, 2591 posts, RR: 17
Reply 12, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 4156 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Then why don't the Tu-154s do what the Il-62s do? Tu-154s have the exact same engines(Tu-154A/B is NK-8-2 and Tu-154M is D30KU). Yet I have never seen one do that not even a picture. Why would only the Il-62 do it? Il-76 same story....

User currently offlineFritzi From United Arab Emirates, joined Jun 2001, 2762 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 4110 times:

Concorde can use the reversers inflight, but only on the Inboard reversers (i think) and with the engines running at idle thrust.

User currently offlineJustplanesmart From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 720 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 4008 times:

Sovietjet:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Yevgeny Pashnin




"So many planes; so little time..."
User currently offlineSovietjet From Bulgaria, joined Mar 2003, 2591 posts, RR: 17
Reply 15, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 3968 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Wow first time I've seen that. And all the summers in Sofia not one Tu-154 did that. Maybe they don't do it as often on -154s.

User currently offlineFrancoflier From France, joined Oct 2001, 3741 posts, RR: 11
Reply 16, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 3902 times:

In the Yak-40, it is standard procedure to reverse the #2 engine about 30 ft above the ground just before the flare.

It is the only engine that's "reversible" on this a/c (the tail mounted one).

The yak-40 is a funny aircraft. It looks like it is powered by three APUs (only 5000lbs of thrust each or so) and has a landing gear that makes it look like it's able to land where a humvee couldn't go...
It also leaves a nice environment friendly black trail wherever it goes, let alone the noise.

I like russian jets, they're workhorses...



Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit posting...
User currently offlineLZ-TLT From Germany, joined Apr 2001, 431 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3859 times:

Sovietjet,

Assuming, you're from Bulgaria, which version of the 154 did you see at LBSF? Balkan had both the B2 and the M series. On the B2, they have cascade-type reversers, so it is not that easy to tell if they are engaged. Also, power to weight ratio might be a factor here. The Tu-154 is(let's face it), somehow poorly designed with an overweight airframe, and this is compensated by the extensive wing mechanization(Kruger leading edge flaps, tripple-slotted Fowler trailing edge flaps, etc). The Ilyushin and Yakovlev designs are not so heavy and much more optimized. So, where you can slow a Tu-154 down by using the flaps and speedbrakes, an Il or Yak keeps on going. Flaps are not that much of an option, taking into account that Flaps 45 degrees on the Tu-154(the usual landing configuration) produce more extra drag than lift, something what the simpler flaps(two-section-single-slotted flaps on the Il-62) can't accomplish


User currently offlineSovietjet From Bulgaria, joined Mar 2003, 2591 posts, RR: 17
Reply 18, posted (10 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 3829 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

LZ-TLT,

Are you Bulgarian too? I would assume so because LZ- is on all Bulgarian aircraft. Kade jiveesh? Anyway yea I know the B2 has cascade reversers but you could possibly tell from the noise if it's in reverse or not. I should rephrase and say that I've never seen a Tu-154M use reverse in Sofia.


User currently offlineLZ-TLT From Germany, joined Apr 2001, 431 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 3648 times:

Sovietjet,

Yes, I am Bulgarian, living in Germany by now(left Bulgaria 5 years ago, but still go down there for my summer vacation)

As for the reversers of the Il-62 and the Tu-154: last night i talked with a former 154 Pilot and he was able to explain to me the whole thing:

deploying the reverser vanes does not actually mean putting the plane into reverse per se. Depending on weight of the aircraft, approach speed, runway length and conditions, the reverser vanes or buckets are deployed in the final phase of the landing prior to touchdown, but the engines are kept idling(or one can even add thrust using the inboard engines on the Il-62/62M and the middle(Nr2) engine on the Tu-154. The effective reverse thrust is obtained AFTER touchdown by spooling the engines up and is regulated smoothly by the throttle(on the Il-62, it is allowed to spool up the engines to 60% of the takeoff thrust when in reverse). The whole thing is also a complicated procedure requiring fine-tuned crew ressource management. The guy who I talked was also able to describe it in detail.


User currently offlineWannabe From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 677 posts, RR: 3
Reply 20, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 3600 times:

How does that effect your ability to execute a last minute missed approach or go around? I would imagine you have to lose a few seconds while the reverser is "re-stowed".

User currently offlineTheGov From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 414 posts, RR: 3
Reply 21, posted (10 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3549 times:

I am not a pilot nor an employee of Fed Ex, but I recall reading somewhere that Fed Ex was, at one time, using reverse thrust in-flight on its B-727s. The article stated that Fed Ex was experiencing higher than normal wear on its engines due to this practice and was going to stop in an effort to reduce expenses as well as the mentioned wear and tear. Why was it done? According to the article, Fed Ex was flying higher and faster closer to the airport in an effort to reduce block times and was using in-flight reverse thrust to slow down on approach.

Unfortunately, I am relying on my memory. I think this article appeared about 5-7 years ago. I had assumed, until the article appeared, that in-flight thrust reverse was dangerous (a la Lauda B-767 crash) and was surprised to hear that it was common practice.

Like I said, I am not a pilot, an employee of Fed Ex and an relying solely on memory.



Always a pallbearer, never a corpse.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic What With Thrust Reverse Prior To Touchdown.
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Reverse Thrust As Opposed To Tug posted Thu Dec 1 2005 03:20:51 by Airfoilsguy
Thrust Reverse With Nose Gear In The Air posted Wed Sep 27 2000 20:10:36 by Gyro
A330 Loud Thumping Just Prior To Final Approach posted Tue Jun 20 2006 17:55:25 by Hrhf1
What Is The Correct Way To Land A Tail Dragger? posted Mon Mar 6 2006 22:45:19 by Jamesbuk
A320 Speedbrake Auto Retract With Thrust > MCT? posted Wed Jan 25 2006 13:06:56 by Sabenaboy
Deicing At Airports Prior To Departure posted Thu Nov 17 2005 23:27:23 by Julesmusician
Thrust Reverse Deployment posted Sat Aug 6 2005 19:50:56 by ANITIX87
What Is The Thing Attached To The Front Gear? posted Wed Jan 12 2005 23:24:54 by Erj145lr
Shell Thrust Reverse More Effective Than Pushback? posted Mon Sep 27 2004 20:35:04 by A340600
What's With This Engine on the A 340? posted Thu May 20 2004 14:39:51 by Tappan

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format