Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Pop Quiz IV  
User currently offlineJetguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (10 years 9 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1378 times:

Here's the scenario...

A pilot wishes to either takeoff or land at an airport (in the United States) with an operating control tower. A 25 knot wind is blowing 90 degrees to the runway, but directly down a taxiway of sufficient length and width to allow a safe takeoff or landing. There are no obstacles or any other impediments that would interfere with the takeoff or landing. The operation is being conducted under Part 91 in day VFR conditions and the active runway is not closed.

Q1: Can the tower issue you a clearance to takeoff or land on the taxiway?
Q2: Is is legal to either takeoff or land on the taxiway?


15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSkyguy11 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (10 years 9 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 1364 times:

1) Gonna go with yes, mainly because of the answer to 2

2) Yeah, but if you screw it up it'll be 'careless and reckless'. As FAR as I know there's no rule that says you have to use the runway!  Big grin


User currently offlineJetguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 9 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 1297 times:

Skyguy...
You only get partial credit for that answer. I'm going to hold off with the answer to see if we can get some more response.
Jetguy


User currently offline707cmf From France, joined Mar 2002, 4885 posts, RR: 29
Reply 3, posted (10 years 9 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1278 times:

Is the airport Chicago Meigs  Wink/being sarcastic ?

In that case, there is no other option ethan the taxiway.

sorry  Wink/being sarcastic

707


User currently offlineSLCPilot From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 581 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (10 years 9 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1279 times:

I make some distinction between T/O and landing, one of the two being mandatory.

Q1) For T/O, I suspect it would have to be requested, and then probably at the tower's discretion. For landing, certainly! Since one can deviate from the FARs (assuming it may be illegal) to the extent needed for safety (in an emergency).

Q2) I would think if the tower approves the operation, it "becomes" legal.

There was a Katana that blew off the side of the runway in Provo, Utah (uncontrolled) about 1 1/2 years ago. The folks operating the unicom all encouraged the pilot to land on the taxiway directly into the wind, but the pilot insisted on the runway with less than optimum results.

SLCPilot



I don't like to be fueled by anger, I don't like to be fooled by lust...
User currently offlineLearpilot From United States of America, joined May 2001, 814 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (10 years 9 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 1222 times:

They'll issue clearance to land on the taxiway "at your own risk". They do it for helicopters all the time.

I would say it's legal, but if you bend metal, you've got some 'splanin to do.



Heed our warnings or your future will be underpant free!
User currently offlineJetguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (10 years 9 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 1222 times:

SLCpilot,
You're on the right track, but only partial credit to you. Anyone else with an idea?
Jetguy


User currently offlineIMissPiedmont From United States of America, joined May 2001, 6280 posts, RR: 34
Reply 7, posted (10 years 9 months 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1192 times:

But if there is a taxiway with sufficient length woukd there not also be a runway into the wind as well?




Quit calling an airport ramp "Tarmac" and a taxiway "runway".
User currently offlineJetguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (10 years 9 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1181 times:

Steve,
Not always, especially out here in the west.
Jetguy


User currently offlineIllini_152 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1000 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (10 years 9 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1183 times:

There is nothing in part 91 regarding landing on a runway. Since there is no federal regulation saying a part 91 flight cannot land on a taxiway, road, driveway, median, semi trailer or houseboat, it is legal, per the FAA to do so.

That is not to say that if you screw up your landing on the roof a a houseboat (seen the pictures from that one) that the FAA will not go after you for careless and reckless though.

I don't know about part 135 or 121, if runways or airports need to be approved by the operator before they can be used. I'm sure one of the airline guys here can answer that one though.

But under part 91, it is perfectly legal to land in your backyard and takeoff again (or, say make an emergency landing in a clear field, have no damage, and take back off. That doesn't even need to get reported, assuming of course if the aircraft is still flyable, then there was no significant damage.)



Happy contrails - I support B747Skipper and Jetguy
User currently offlineJetguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (10 years 9 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1178 times:

Bingo!

Mike, you win the prize.

Operations under Part 135 do require a runway, but under Part 91 it is not. The control tower however can not clear you to either land or takeoff from a taxiway. What they will do is provide you with traffic advisories and advise the pilot that takeoff or landing is at the pilot's descretion. Over the years, I've had to do it a couple of times and it is no big deal. It sure beats landing or takingoff in a marginal crosswind.

Jetguy


User currently offlineIllini_152 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1000 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (10 years 9 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1167 times:

When I was towing banners in Jersey we'd sometimes have to go to the local airport, WWD, to get gas when we couldn't get it delivered to our "field". Some days the wind would be really blowing, and any runway would have a crosswind too strong to land a Cub in, especially one with no brakes, and busted tailwheel steering.

Since WWD was an old Navy base from WWII, it uses the standard 3 runways crossing with the large field in the middle. This field was longer than our runway, and in better condition. When there was a strong wind, we'd just land there and not think anything of it. Of course, I've never tried it at a controlled field, or in anything bigger than a PA-12. Configured for towing though, it was hard to think of a spot where we couldn't land and take back off out of if we wanted too.

One of the nice things about our field though, was since it was carved out of forrest, all you'd really get was turbulence as you went below the treeline on approach; no real crosswind to speak of.

--
Mike



Happy contrails - I support B747Skipper and Jetguy
User currently offlineIMissPiedmont From United States of America, joined May 2001, 6280 posts, RR: 34
Reply 12, posted (10 years 9 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1124 times:

Having had the requisite 24 hours to think about things, I realize that certain airports, OAK springs to mind, have taxiways that could handle a light aircraft. And though not a part 91 or a crosswind situation, AM pilots seemed to like the taxiway here in TUS for landing.

PS: I can spell would. Really, I can!

Houseboat???



Quit calling an airport ramp "Tarmac" and a taxiway "runway".
User currently offlineIllini_152 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1000 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (10 years 9 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1063 times:

It was a stunt somewhere in Florida, a houseboat was setup with a reinforced deck on the roof and chugged along at full speed into the wind. A Piper Cub flew over, matched speed with it, and touched down on the deck. Don't know exactly when or where, but my old boss showed me the newspaper clipping, said it was a friend of his.

Same guy had a PA-18 with an O-540 strapped to the front. I DID see that one. Just a slight modification, involvign reinforced tubing halfway back, the firewall and bootcowling cut, insturment panel removed and moved back to where the front seat should have been, balast added to the tail, and 80 gal. bush tanks in the wings. It was used for towing REAL big banners.

--
Mike



Happy contrails - I support B747Skipper and Jetguy
User currently offlineJetguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (10 years 9 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1040 times:

My favorite "runway" is a river or a lake. I'm sure you've all seen the pictures of the bush pilots flying Super Cubs with Tundra Tires (not floats) hydroplaning on the water. Hey, I understand the physics behind it, but still, those guys must have cajones the size of basketballs. Big grin
Jetguy

P.S. Don't try this at home boys and girls.


User currently offlineIllini_152 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1000 posts, RR: 2
Reply 15, posted (10 years 9 months 20 hours ago) and read 1010 times:

Already have, but it didn't work too well  Big grin Of course, the water was only about 6-12" deep, we had a very wet spring, and our field was flooded quite often to the point of being closer to a swamp. The trick was to touchdown on the one dry spot, and be slowed down enough to avoid the deep water.

It didn't work. I faired OK, just got REAL wet- backseat of a Cub with no doors hitting a mud puddle at 35 mph is NOT fun. I managed to keep the stick back and gave it enough power to keep her upright.

One of our other pilots landed long and fast, and made the mistake of hitting the brakes as he hit the mud puddle (as evidenced by the plowing at the end of his tracks). He went over on his back. The plane was back up flying in 2 weeks...



Happy contrails - I support B747Skipper and Jetguy
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Pop Quiz IV
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Pop Quiz: A300 Freighter posted Thu Mar 29 2007 18:12:49 by Panman
Pop Quiz: Private Students/Pilots posted Sun Jul 11 2004 04:51:35 by JBirdAV8r
Pop Quiz posted Fri Nov 7 2003 05:23:48 by Cdfmxtech
Pop Quiz Part III posted Sun Oct 19 2003 06:46:53 by Jetguy
Pop Quiz: Sheetmetal posted Fri Oct 17 2003 04:11:54 by Fokker Lover
Pop Quiz posted Thu Oct 16 2003 18:06:36 by Cdfmxtech
Pop Quiz Part II posted Wed Oct 15 2003 18:15:44 by Jetguy
Pop Quiz posted Wed Oct 15 2003 04:25:43 by Jetguy
Another Pop Quiz posted Wed Oct 8 2003 05:53:22 by Cdfmxtech
Pop Quiz posted Wed Oct 8 2003 00:34:40 by Cdfmxtech

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format