Mozart From Luxembourg, joined Aug 2003, 2359 posts, RR: 21 Posted (12 years 2 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 6041 times:
I often hear that London ATC is among the best in the world. I read it on this forum, but also heard a Lufthansa pilot say that in-flight (when he told us that we were going to hold for some time but that ATC in London is among the best in the world so there would be a chance of this not lasting long).
I imagine that it can be quite a headache handling all that Heathrow traffic on just two runways, but what exactly are the aspects that make people say that London is so good?
WILLO From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 1352 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (12 years 2 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 6001 times:
Not sure of all the technical reasons, but bear in mind London Terminal Control also looks after flights for LGW, STN, LCY in addition to LHR, all within a fairly small geographical area. It takes some doing.
Arsenal@LHR From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 7792 posts, RR: 17
Reply 2, posted (12 years 2 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 5968 times:
The skies above London and the south east of England are one of the busiest in the world. If you've ever flown in or out of LHR you will see the amount of aircraft on hold or in stack. It's one hell of a job juggling all that traffic in a pre-defined geographical area.
Mozart From Luxembourg, joined Aug 2003, 2359 posts, RR: 21
Reply 3, posted (12 years 2 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 5957 times:
Hmmm, I knew all of that, but then London is a bit like NYC or LAX, plenty of airports, lots of traffic. Still somehow the guys from Southcal or NYC have never been mentioned as being as great as the ones from London. So what is it that makes them so great? Calm? Control? Trying to cut corners? Smart ways to organise traffic?
411A From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 1826 posts, RR: 8
Reply 4, posted (12 years 2 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 5923 times:
Having flown into LHR and LGW since 1974, and listened to these guys a LOT, can personally say that they absolutely are NO better than others that control in busy TMA's...AMS and FRA, come to mind in Europe, LAX and DFW in the USA.
You ask the Brits, and they will say LHR is the best.
Consider the source.
Ejazz From United Arab Emirates, joined May 2002, 737 posts, RR: 32
Reply 6, posted (12 years 2 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 5917 times:
I'd put London Heathrow at the top of the best of the ATC league.
Why, because they are so professional, always cool under pressure, use proper RT techniques, appear to understand the capabilities of an aircraft and its crew, and instill confidence in all who come under their control. They are superb and justify their excellent reputation.
Jetguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (12 years 2 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 5795 times:
Just an experience that I had a few years ago with London ATC...
We were preparing to depart from the west coast of the US to fly to Farnsborough. We were given a two-hour ground hold because they didn't want us to arrive during a shift change - they were afraid that one of their controllers might not show up because of the flu. Among the best? I wasn't impressed. Of the many other times that I have flown into the London area they were competent - good, but not outstanding. Personally, I believe that outstanding controllers are where you find them.
Ba299 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2003, 173 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (12 years 2 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 5778 times:
I fly from-to LHR and LGW all the days. The difference are that they are always calm also during bad weather condition. Very important they say exactly what you have to do. And you don't heard all that noise that you can heard flying to EWR or DFW.
Bravo45 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 2165 posts, RR: 10
Reply 11, posted (12 years 2 months 20 hours ago) and read 5716 times:
Personally, I believe that outstanding controllers are where you find them.
While I would agree to Jetguy completely, I have heard that the German controllers are the best. Don't remember the source but I do believe that the source is a big factor.
Santhosh From India, joined Sep 2001, 548 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 5222 times:
They have got Arrivals and Departures every minute of certain periods of the day.So to keep up with the oncomming traffic the ATC must be very very effeciant,to keep the sky safe.So EGLL ATC is one of the best ATC's in the world.
Geotrash From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 326 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 5170 times:
I think there's something to be said for controllers at a busy GA airport as well, especially on a Saturday afternoon. Juggling 20 or more planes in the Class Delta and on the ground- some singles, some twins, some jets. Touch and gos, full stop landings, practice ILS approaches; it's amazing there aren't more midairs in that environment. Most I've worked with are very good at harnessing the chaos and keeping things flowing, while being courteous. A bad controller really sticks out in such an environment.
The large centers such as London and New York do have the benefit that most of the traffic is comparably well organized IFR. I'm not suggesting that there is an accurate comparison here- it's apples to oranges. I'm simply saying that GA airport controllers also deserve a round of applause for managing mayhem.