Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Using Little Runway For Jet Landing?  
User currently offlineTarzanboy From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 132 posts, RR: 0
Posted (11 years 22 hours ago) and read 2447 times:


my hometown airport is 10000 feet long...

a new terminal building was recently built about midway of the runway,,,

i sometimes notice that on approach...jets (such as 737-800 and airbus a310), overfly the runway for a long period before gliding down for touchdown..

i came to a conclusion that the guys do this because they don't want to land to close to the beginning of the runway, in order to avoid a long taxi to the terminal...is this done on purpose?

i difinitely don't think that ground effect will be the case all the time...so i think it is purposely done....

i think this is a dangerous feat though....wat if for some reason you get ground while gliding her down past the middle of the runway???

hmmm......call the medics!!!!!!!!!!

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineRendezvous From New Zealand, joined May 2001, 521 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (11 years 22 hours ago) and read 2435 times:

The chances of an unexpected encounter with the ground are no more present in this case than on any approach. In some ways I think it's safer to approach high (as long as you do have enough runway to stop on safely), because you get more clearence over obsticles.

As for the long landing, not too sure about the reason. I'm pretty sure you can stop the planes in 5,000' if you try? On the other hand, is there a displaced threshold?

User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (11 years 22 hours ago) and read 2429 times:

>>>i came to a conclusion that the guys do this because they don't want to land to close to the beginning of the runway, in order to avoid a long taxi to the terminal...is this done on purpose?

Operationally, it would would make more sense to land normally, i.e. more towards the touchdown end of the runway, slow, and turn-off the runway at mid-fleld, assuming there is a taxiway at mid-field on which to do so.

If there no mid-field turn-off, and a landing aircraft has to go all the way to the far end of the runway before taxiing back to the terminal, landing way further on down the runway "wastes" runway that you might need to stop. (One of the three most useless things in aviation: the altitude above you, the runway behind you, and the fuel you just dumped). If the only taxiway off the runway is at the far end, it makes more sense to land normally, and keep the rollout moving towards the end once you're on the ground.

Some landings are "floaters"... Maybe you saw a couple of those...

User currently offlineMr.BA From Singapore, joined Sep 2000, 3423 posts, RR: 22
Reply 3, posted (11 years 16 hours ago) and read 2362 times:

On small propeller planes I've seen many pilots do this... they 'float' the plane quite far down the runway in order to vacate at their desired taxiway provided they have atc clearance to do so. Anyway they'd take a longer time if they touchdown normally and roll down the runway so ATC's normally fine with them doing that.

For big jets I believe pilots should always touchdown normally at the TDZ... I mean planes like those land at much higher speeds and they could brake lightly and roll down and they'll not stop as fast as the props do.

Boeing747 万岁!
User currently offlineTarzanboy From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 132 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (11 years 15 hours ago) and read 2352 times:


no displaced threshold in the scenario i am talking about...

User currently offlineSlamclick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 5, posted (11 years 2 hours ago) and read 2274 times:

Hard to tell without seeing your actual airport and maybe talking with the crews. Here in the US, with the major carriers, pilots MUST touch down within a certain bracket - for example, at the 1000' touchdown zone marker plus or minus 250 feet. To do otherwise may subject them to re-training or other consequences.

I'd go with the suggestion of normal touchdown and roll out with no real braking effort. Easier on the airplane.

You would not believe how short a jet airliner can land. I have landed a DC-9-15 (no leading edge slats) at a high elevation airport with a medium load in a 1700 foot ground roll, 2700' total from the approach end of the runway. The brakes did it all, the engines never even spooled up in reverse before we were below 80 knots and bringing it out of reverse. The brakes got hot, but not dangerously hot. I have seen a DC-10 flown by McD test pilots land shorter than that at KYUM. No reversers on that one.

Still, with passengers on board it is better by far to touch down on the aiming marker.

Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Using Little Runway For Jet Landing?
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Using A Camcorder During Takeoff And Landing posted Sat Nov 25 2006 17:21:11 by FCA767
Can It Be Too Cold For A Jet Engine To Operate? posted Mon Jan 23 2006 20:22:26 by Julesmusician
Airline Pilots using Flight Sim for training posted Fri Dec 16 2005 10:22:15 by Darrenthe747
Powercurves For Jet Engines And Props posted Wed Oct 5 2005 13:16:25 by ArniePie
A Little Question For Commercial Pilot? posted Fri Aug 19 2005 05:11:51 by STARalliance24
A/C Using Alternate Runway At LGB posted Sun Aug 1 2004 07:33:52 by RiffedAAMech
A 1685m Runway...for Which Acft? posted Wed May 5 2004 12:33:04 by Ts-ior
Question For Pilots: Landing Gear posted Sun Mar 21 2004 23:15:49 by AR385
Spot Pricing For Jet Fuel posted Fri Mar 5 2004 19:14:35 by Travelmark
Using My Headset For Music? posted Sun Aug 3 2003 01:30:07 by Bacardi182

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format