Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Airbus Cockpit Question......  
User currently offlineBrunswick737 From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 400 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 14 hours ago) and read 5859 times:

I just downloaded a ton of airbus & boeing cockpit videos and during the landing phase when it goes 50,40,30,20,10 then the voice says "retard" a couple to times before touchdown, then when it stops, the plane touches down. I viewed the boeing cockpit landings and I dont here the "retard" after the countdown...I was wondering what is that for and why boeing does not have that "word" before touchdown????????????

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBuckfifty From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 1316 posts, RR: 20
Reply 1, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 14 hours ago) and read 5813 times:

It just means to retard the throttle. I suppose Boeing thinks that most pilots aren't retards, and would know what to do when they come in for the flare.

To each their own, I suppose.


User currently offlineAJ From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 2392 posts, RR: 24
Reply 2, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 12 hours ago) and read 5779 times:

When being manually flown most Boeing types are no longer using the autothrottle so speed and power is under the control of the Pilot Flying.

On the Airbus the autothrottle provides speed control on finals, with the thrust levers remaining stationary. When the RETARD call is made the thrust levers are retarded from the climb detent to allow idle thrust to be achieved at the expense of the commanded speed for landing.

Cheers!


User currently offlineMr.BA From Singapore, joined Sep 2000, 3423 posts, RR: 22
Reply 3, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 10 hours ago) and read 5767 times:

Is it to say that the thrust levers on Airbuses are nothing like Boeing in the sense of moving freely? I understand that Airbus throttles don't really move along with the spooling up/down of the engines. Does the throttle lever stay stationary at CLB Detent when thrust is reduced upon levelling at cruise altitude and stays at that position until the computer calls for "Retard" just before touchdown (assuming autothrust is used all the while)?

I've read that before you can actually disconnect the autothrottle you have to manually pull the thrust levers to the corresponding thrust at that point of time (there's a pointer at the engine gauges?)? How do you do it, if the throttles can only be operated and moved between "gates"?

Thanks!



Boeing747 万岁!
User currently offlineMandala499 From Indonesia, joined Aug 2001, 6877 posts, RR: 75
Reply 4, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 5751 times:

I thought the Airbus Autothrottles have to be in the CLB/AT position or above (eg. TOGA or FLX for take off mode, CLB/AT for other modes) for the Autothrottle to be engaged? So moving it below the CLB/AT (eg. hit the IDLE) position, not anywhere in between) will disconnect the A/T and let the engines go to idle for the touchdown. You can power up the engines again (for whatever reason) manually after that...

What I'm not sure is what if you don't hit the idle detent? Will it disconnect? Or press the A/T D/C below CLB/AT detent?

Mr.BA, yes, those throttles don't move along like the Boeings, which does not allow manual intervention with the exception of A/T D/C or TO-GA. To disconnect, you need to "sync" the throttle to the corresponding power setting then press the D/C... or just hit idle... (not sure about this last bit).

For Boeings, throttle move along with the thrust setting at all times, under manual or auto throttle. This would give the pilot some comfort if the A/T becomes slow to react... which CAN (not always does) happen. You can manually intervene and then let go of the throttles and it'll settle according to the A/T.

Not saying one is wrong and the other is right, just a different mode of operation and a different logic.

AJ, in Garuda, the pilots fly with A/T on full time in their SOP. A/T landings require manual intervention to idle the engines in both the bus and the boeing when flaring.

Computer: "50, 40, 30, 20, RETARD"
PF: "Going around! TOGA!"
PNF: "Going around aye, TOGA set, positive climb... flap2"
PF: "Gear up..."
PNF: "Gear up aye... by the way, why go around?"
PF: "Who does it think I am calling me RETARD?"

Old joke...

Mandala499



When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
User currently offlineMr.BA From Singapore, joined Sep 2000, 3423 posts, RR: 22
Reply 5, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 5735 times:

I've read up quite a bit on the throttles of Airbuses. I'm still pretty confused and I can't figure out what did Airbus based on to have this logic of operation? I'm not saying it's wrong or it's not desirable, but why this logic? What did they have in mind when they designed this?

Again I feel it's more logical to have the throttles moving with the engines to enable pilots to have 'direct feedback' and direct reference as to which level of thrust the engines are at... etc. I'm not bashing Airbus but am just pretty curious on how they did come up with this idea?

Cheers!

alvin



Boeing747 万岁!
User currently offlineMD11Engineer From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 14027 posts, RR: 62
Reply 6, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 5727 times:

They made the system simpler. On Boeing aiircraft you´ll have an auto throttle actuator for each thrust lever beneath the center pedestal, which is controlled by the auto throttle computer and in turn moves the thrust lever. The thrust levers in turn control the engine power. I think it is a left-over from the old days of mechanical control of the engines through cables and pulleys. Today on electronic engines the thrust lever operates a thrust lever angle resolver (TRA), which sends an electric signal to the engine EEC. Instead of going the detour of moving the throttle mechanicaly to control the TRA resolvers and THEN sending an electric signal to the engines, Airbus sends the signal directly from the flight control / auto thrust computers to the engine EECs.
The drawback is that the pilot can´t see with a glance at the thrust levers what the engine power setting is. I think it takes some time to get used to. The MD-11 used a similar system as Boeing.

Jan


User currently offlineAJ From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 2392 posts, RR: 24
Reply 7, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 5719 times:

Mandala499, landing with the autothrottle engaged in a Boeing will cause the Master Caution 'AUTOTHROTTLE' to appear when reverse is selected after touchdown, that's after forcing the thrust levers closed as the servos will try increase thrust to maintain commanded speed except in an autoland. It seems odd that Garuda has this battle on every landing!

User currently offlineSlamclick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 8, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 hours ago) and read 5638 times:

When, during landing, the Airbus annunciates "retard" it does so twice as a verb, after that it is a noun.

Minor correction here. The airbus thrust levers can be set anywhere but if they are not set in the appropriate detent the system will remind you to move them. The autothrottle system has authority from just above an idle up to the position set by the thrust lever - even if the lever is not set in a detent. There is a small green (I think-don't have one in front of me) donut on the N1 gauges that show Thrust Lever Angle.

Therefore, for a full thrust takeoff you would set TOGA. For a reduced thrust takeoff you would set FLEX/MCT. Which would give thrust based on the assumed temperature up to the flex power setting or maximum continuous. Either way, at acceleration height after takeoff the system will annunciate "LVR CLB" and you need only move the lever back to CLB position. If you must level off at low altitude, say 2000' the command bars will guide you through the pushover to level off and the engines will automatically throttle back to maintain the speed limit for configuration/altitude.

It is a great system but it sure could make you lazy.




Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offlineMandala499 From Indonesia, joined Aug 2001, 6877 posts, RR: 75
Reply 9, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 2 hours ago) and read 5643 times:

AJ,
I only had a brief look at GA's manuals... But approaches are to be done with auto throttle...

On the 737s, it appears that for single channel autoapproach, A/P should be disconnected at DH or prior to 50ft whichnever is higher, then the A/T will announce FLARE at 27ft RA and closes the throttles in 6 seconds, then disengages 2 seconds afterwards.

Anyways, had a quick call to check it and I seem that they D/C A/T prior to flare anyways... "best to make sure it goes to idle when you want it to"... and to prevent such battles you mentioned...

Thanks for spotting what I overlooked...

Mandala499



When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
User currently onlineN243NW From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1632 posts, RR: 20
Reply 10, posted (10 years 9 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 5433 times:

Just a cool tidbit of information about the 'Bus aural warning system:

The altitude callouts are made from 50 to 20 feet, upon which "Retard" is said repetedly until the pilot closes the throttles. Once this is accomplished, the computer tells the pilots the current radio altitude. It would go something like this:
fifty....fourty.....thirty......twenty..retard..retard..ret-eight........[touchdown]

I posted this question a while ago and never got an answer. On final, why do some Airbuses say weird R/A callouts like "two hundred and thirty"? Is this just different airlines having the computer programmed differentyl? Correct me if I'm wrong about any of this.

Merry Christmas Y'all!
-N243NW  Big thumbs up



B-52s don't take off. They scare the ground away.
User currently offlineIanatSTN From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 577 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (10 years 9 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 5400 times:

Thanks for the info on the bus aural warning system, N243NW, interesting stuff!!

Cheers  Smile/happy/getting dizzy
Ian@STN



Ian@STN ::
User currently offlineAM From Mexico, joined Oct 1999, 589 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (10 years 9 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 5353 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

AJ, how are you?

I was reading a topic on PPRuNe.org the other day about different company procedures regarding autothrottle use during manual approaches/landings. Most of the pilots participating fly 737s, but I think it's somehow similar on the 757/767. When you disconnect the A/P, do you disconnect A/T right away, or do you leave it engaged until just before flaring? Or is it up to the PF?

I was allowed to jumpseat in a Mexicana 757 on September. When landing in MEX, I noticed the captain disconnecting the A/T more or less at the 100ft call (which by the way was made by the PNF, since there were no callouts after inhibiting the "G/S" warning). He just had to retard and that was it.

And something off topic (sorry), but that has to do with the same landing. Speed brakes were armed, but didn't deploy upon main gear touch down. Before nose wheel touch down, the PNF called out something like "Spoilers not deployed!", and was very quick to manually extend the speed brakes. What's the reason for this? Does that happen often? The captain was like "NO, NO!", but it was too late and bam!, a very hard nose wheel slam into the ground. After vacating the runway, the captain told the FO he preferred not to deploy spoilers immediately after touchdown, conditions permitting, because it was much more gentle to do that manually once with all wheels on the ground.

Cheers,
AM



"... for there you have been and there you will long to return."
User currently offlineCanadianNorth From Canada, joined Aug 2002, 3390 posts, RR: 9
Reply 13, posted (10 years 9 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 5240 times:

...According to the computer the pilots are retards that dont know when to pull back on the power....




CanadianNorth



What could possibly go wrong?
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Airbus Cockpit Question......
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airbus Cockpit Question posted Tue Apr 23 2002 09:51:55 by LMML 14/32
Continental 737-300 Cockpit Question posted Fri Nov 24 2006 08:26:31 by Artsyman
Airbus Strobes Question posted Mon Aug 7 2006 12:48:02 by BA777
727 Cockpit Question posted Sat Mar 25 2006 20:03:41 by EDDM
Airbus Autopilot Question posted Sat Jan 21 2006 14:10:36 by Mir
A340 Cockpit Question posted Thu Jan 19 2006 02:21:01 by Sna350
C5 Cockpit Question posted Thu Dec 22 2005 22:52:04 by Matt72033
Airbus Winglet Question posted Mon Dec 12 2005 03:36:27 by Dakar
A332 Cockpit Question posted Mon Aug 8 2005 19:03:03 by Panther
727 Cockpit Question posted Mon Jul 25 2005 23:04:18 by Wilax

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format