Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
DC-9/MD-80 Engine Change  
User currently offlineBR715-A1-30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (12 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 5404 times:

I read some time ago, that NW and CO was planning on fitting RR Tays to their DC9 and MD80 fleets as part of conversion to fuel efficiency. Now as we can see it has not happened, but I do not know what happened to the plans. I know NW has retired its MD80s, I know that CO has retired the DC9s, and they are retiring their MD-80s. Is NW still planning on converting the engines to TAYS or BR710s or are they just going to keep the JT8D engines.

BTW -- I read this in a Monthly Employee Newsletter in December 1998/January 1999 for NW

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineFlashmeister From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 2939 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (12 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 5323 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

If I recall, NW does not have an MD-80 fleet. The 80s were retired some time ago. Can anyone confirm?

User currently offlineN243NW From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1658 posts, RR: 19
Reply 2, posted (12 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 5315 times:

Yes, I can confirm.
I know NW has retired its MD80s
-N243NW Big grin

B-52s don't take off. They scare the ground away.
User currently offlineLMP737 From United States of America, joined May 2002, 5065 posts, RR: 16
Reply 3, posted (12 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 5233 times:

Considering the money trouble both airlines are having I doubt you will see this happen. Then there's the fact the Continental will be retiring thier MD-80's rather soon. Not much reason to spend all that time and money on an aircraft that will be leaving the fleet. My gut instincts tell me that NWA will not go through with it either for their DC-9's.

However if they did decide to do it I would go with the BR710/715. Better engine than the TAY.

Never take financial advice from co-workers.
User currently offlineBluewave 707 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3164 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (12 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 5168 times:

In NW's case, the DC-9s will be replaced with the A320 series on order.

In CO's case, the MD-80s will be replaced by the 737-800s & -900s.

The fate of the DC-9s and MD-80s are written on the wall. Retirement in the desert, hopefully to be picked up by smaller carriers, or low fare start-ups, or ...

"The best use of your life will be to so live your life, that the use of your life will outlive your life" -- D Severn
User currently offlineBeltwayBandit From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 495 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (12 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 5133 times:

That would take a lot of engineering and legal work, without much benefit. This was probably a solution when DC9s needed to achieve Stage 3 noise compliance. Hush kits achieved it for a fraction of the cost of fitting new engines.

I always wondered why DC9s were not refitted with JT8D-200 series engines. Again, I assume it is a matter of cost.

User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (12 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 5075 times:

When you compare the costs of hushkits to new engines, hushkits will win. For the price of one brand new engine, you get two hushkit units. It would be a task to get a new engine type certified for the MD-80, not to mention all of the retrofits that would have to be incorporated. Overall, hushkits are a cheaper way to go. While a BR-715 engined MD-80 would look nice, more than likely these a/c will be hushkitted or have the JT8D-209s replaced with the JT8D-219s from the MD-88, since these engines are related. It is easier with a wing-mounted engine, like with the various engine retrofits on the DC-8 and 707.

User currently offline747Teach From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 176 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (12 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 4976 times:

BR715-A1-30: There are no plans to reengine the DC-9 fleet. With the current glut of JT-8 engines on the lease market, there would be little economic reason to do so. All DC-9 engines have the hush kit. There are currently no MD-80's in the NWA fleet. There are approximately 20 A319/320 aircraft on order, which is hardly enough to replace the 167 DC-9's currently operating. The DC-9's will be in the fleet for the forseeable future. Regards,

User currently offlineBroke From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 1325 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (12 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 4980 times:

Putting Tay's on DC-9's is not a new idea. At a previous carrier that I worked for, we looked at it in the late 1980's.
Two problems were cost ($10,000,000 an engine plus the retrofit costs to the airplane) and coast down with an engine out. The airplane was calculated not to be able to maintain a safe altitude with an engine out over the Rocky Mountains.
The costs have most certainly gone up, while later versions of the Tay may have more thrust to avoid the coast down problem.
To spend an estimated $25-30 on an old airplane will never be cost effective.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic DC-9/MD-80 Engine Change
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
DC-9/MD-80 Engine Maintainence posted Wed Sep 20 2000 08:30:13 by GUNDU
Any MD-80 Engine Retrofits? posted Wed Mar 29 2006 04:18:58 by L1329II
DC-9 / MD-80 Elevator Bird Strike - Dangerous? posted Thu May 19 2005 01:50:45 by Prebennorholm
DC-9/MD-80/B717 posted Fri Jul 23 2004 21:38:29 by Jetliner145
MD-80 Engine "slant" posted Tue Jun 10 2003 20:32:57 by Bigphilnyc
MD-80 Engine Failed To Start-> Start Cards? posted Tue Oct 8 2002 23:08:22 by Mirrodie
MD-80 Engine Use posted Tue Jun 27 2000 21:13:13 by Aa777dr
MD-80/DC-9 Crash posted Sat Aug 7 2004 16:54:06 by Infiniti757
DC-10/MD-11 Engine#2 posted Mon Aug 11 2003 04:11:58 by N243NW
DC-10 / MD-80 Vents posted Thu Jan 24 2002 21:56:39 by Rydawg82

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format