Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
The 747-300 And -400  
User currently offlineTiger119 From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1919 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2988 times:

There is a thread in the civil forum asking about the -300 and -400s. I have a different question. Other than winglets, what is the difference between the two series? I know it has to be more than the winglets? Avionics? Range? Number of seats? It is this type of question that makes me want to go to A/P school.


Flying is the second greatest thrill known to mankind, landing is the first!
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLiamksa From Australia, joined Oct 2001, 308 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2961 times:

I found one!


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Luis Rosa
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Will Lanting


vs.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Raymond Wang



 Big grin


User currently offlineQantasA332 From Australia, joined Dec 2003, 1500 posts, RR: 26
Reply 2, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2955 times:

In terms of specification, the 744 has a greater range, greater wingspan, and greater MTOW than the 743. Other differences on the 744 (other than the winglets) include a two-crew EFIS flight deck (the 743 operates with a flight engineer), an improved interior, recontoured wing-fuselage fairing, and of course, different, more powerful engines.
Hope this is what you were looking for...

qantasA332


User currently offlineUTA_flyinghigh From Tunisia, joined Oct 2001, 6495 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2954 times:

The most important difference from when I was a kid :
The 744's upper deck staircase is straight, whereas the 747 Classic's have a spiral one. I had quite a lot of fun attempting to slide down from the upper deck to the main deck, getting sometimes scolded by the pretty FA's lol  Laugh out loud

UTA



Fly to live, live to fly - Air France/KLM Flying Blue Platinum, BMI Diamond Club Gold, Emirates Skywards
User currently offlineTiger119 From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1919 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2929 times:

QantasA332:

Are the -300 cockpits gauges and not screens? I thought the -300s were glass cockpits with a flight crew of two? I guess if I didn't assume, I might have spent time going through pictures! Thanks for the answer QantasA332 and UTA_flyinghigh.

David



Flying is the second greatest thrill known to mankind, landing is the first!
User currently offlineNudelhirsch From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 1438 posts, RR: 19
Reply 5, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2915 times:

I personally liked this 300 deck:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Julian Whitelaw
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Wilfried Schnetzler




or the modernized ones (showing a 742 though...):


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Manuel Marin - IBERIAN SPOTTERS
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Manuel Marin - IBERIAN SPOTTERS



You meant one of these? All of them have a 3 crew, not 2...

but then, nothing can beat the classic deck of a 742 loaded with hundreds of gauges and switches...




Putana da Seatbeltz!
User currently offlineBio15 From Colombia, joined Mar 2001, 1089 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 2807 times:

Hi David.

Another feature, which also helped improve the range of the -400 series, is that it has fuel tanks added on the horizontal stabilizer. It basically has fuel anywhere where it fits. The horizontal stab. can hold 3,300 gallons of fuel.

---

The increased wingspan, as mentioned above, enabled an additional leading edge flap section making a total of 11 sections on each side (not including the Kruegers on the inboard sides)

---

Rudder deflection is increased to +/- 30 degrees on the -400

---

Wheel diameter was increased by 2 inches. This enlargement enables the undercarriages to house BFGoodrich carbon brakes. The previous versions of the 747 were heavy maintainance on the undercarriages apparently!

---

The APU is changed to a Pratt APU, the PW901A, which proved fuel savings of up to 40%. I am not sure which was the previous APU on the 747s.

---

On the interior, the -400 has a "glass cockpit", and restyled interiors. One of the big mistakes boeing made was to offer a huge amount of possibilities for the customers to choose configuration options on the interior design. Sometimes delivering the aircraft required very long additional working hours to cope with customer needs.


Those are most of the changes made on the -400 compared to the -300, including those mentioned above. Hope it helps  Smile

Good Luck
-Alfredo


User currently offlineMr.BA From Singapore, joined Sep 2000, 3423 posts, RR: 22
Reply 7, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2710 times:

Any idea why the increasein rudder deflection? I guess weight is a factor here?


Boeing747 万岁!
User currently offlineDw747400 From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 1254 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 2702 times:

I believe that a number of changes were made to the wing/body fairing as well.

Increasing rudder deflection gives better control, especially in the "null zone" between where the speed is high enough for aerodynamic forces on the rudder to control yaw to where speed is low enough for significant nose wheel steering (I really don't know the numbers, but nosewheel travel increases as speed decreases). I'm not sure if it has to do with the increased weight or not.

For the horizontal stabilizer tank, isn't that an option? I know it’s new on the 744, but I though that it was added some time after initial entry into service.



CFI--Certfied Freakin Idiot
User currently offlineLiamksa From Australia, joined Oct 2001, 308 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 2697 times:

Any idea why the increasein rudder deflection? I guess weight is a factor here?

I'll have a stab....with a greater amount of thrust being produced by each of the engines on the -400 compared to the -300, the -400 would have a higher Vmc (being calculated at full thrust on the live engines), requiring an increased rudder deflection to to bring the Vmc back down?

Or maybe i'm a little obsessed with my recent assymmetric training and it has nothing to do with that  Big grin

Rob.


User currently offlineBio15 From Colombia, joined Mar 2001, 1089 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2592 times:

The increased rudder deflection improved ground handling at high speeds. Indeed, Rob, the Vmc was reduced by this increase in rudder deflection by 10 knots.  Smile Not sure if it's to bring it back down though.


-Alfredo



User currently offlineMr.BA From Singapore, joined Sep 2000, 3423 posts, RR: 22
Reply 11, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 2546 times:

Thanks guys, just a short question, what's Vmc?

Thanks!



Boeing747 万岁!
User currently offlineDw747400 From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 1254 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (10 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 2560 times:

Velocity-Minimum Control

As I understand it, on a multi-engine plane, it represents the speed at which the aircraft must be traveling so that the flight controls generate enough force to counteract an asymmetric thrust condition.



CFI--Certfied Freakin Idiot
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic The 747-300 And -400
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
DHC-8-100/200/300 And Q-400 Question. posted Tue Oct 26 2004 19:41:43 by N737MC
747-1,2,300 Vs 400 Landings posted Sat Oct 20 2001 23:20:28 by B1C17L1011
What Naca Airfoil Type Does The 747-400 Use? posted Thu Oct 12 2006 15:06:04 by Flybyguy
Difference Between 747-200 Cockpit And 747-300? posted Tue Aug 16 2005 08:04:07 by Mozart
Info About The 747-400 Combi (OEW) posted Thu Mar 10 2005 02:13:30 by Luis777
747-300 With GE Engs. And Rich Posn On Start Lever posted Thu Sep 4 2003 18:43:35 by Rohan737
The Size Of The 747 Freighter Opening posted Sat Oct 21 2006 11:34:47 by NZ107
What's This Little Hump On The 747? posted Sat Jul 22 2006 18:48:45 by Alphafloor
Differences Between B767-300 Vs. -400? posted Thu Jul 20 2006 01:40:35 by CDreier
Whats The Similarities Between The TF-39 And CF-6? posted Wed May 31 2006 22:52:49 by 747400sp

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format