Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
ZRH Approach?  
User currently offlineFightingfalcon From Switzerland, joined Feb 2001, 787 posts, RR: 1
Posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1890 times:

The standart procedure is an approach from the north. Why do 95 per cent of the aircraft use ILS 14 and only very few ILS 16?

And what exactly is the difference between a "side step" and a "swing over"?

I need that for a piece of work...
Thanks

Martin


Imprezas rule!!
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineA3xx900 From Germany, joined Jan 2004, 335 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1862 times:

Doesn't it have something to do with flying into German airspace or so?


Why is 10 afraid of 7? Because 7 8 9.
User currently offlineFightingfalcon From Switzerland, joined Feb 2001, 787 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1814 times:

They are not allowed to land from the north in the morning because of the germans...

What I'm asking is why do they land more on RWY 14 than on RWY 16. I found out it's because of the Glide Slope signal of the ILS 16 not being reliable. Why is that? Does noone know?

And Side step and Swing over?



Imprezas rule!!
User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1777 times:

I have NO idea of what I'm talking about, but as a guess from the use of the language:

A Swing Over would be a change from one direction to another, such as Zurich's ILS 14 approach and swinging over to runway 16 about 30 seconds before touchdown. In a swing over, there is only one change in direction.

A Side Step would be a switch between 2 parallel runways, where you use an ILS of, say 18R and jump over to 18L once you've sighted the field. In this manoevre, there would be two changes in direction - turning towards the 2nd glidepath and then turning onto it, so I guess this would be a little trickier than a swingover.

Like I said, I have no idea, but the language seems to make sense.

Charles


User currently offline411A From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 1826 posts, RR: 8
Reply 4, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1751 times:

Landings are done on runway 14 (ISO runway 16) in ZRH primarily so as not to disrupt takeoffs on runway 28.
It actually works rather well.


User currently offlineMozart From Luxembourg, joined Aug 2003, 2182 posts, RR: 13
Reply 5, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1686 times:

I concur with 411A, the reason 14 is used is to have 28 and also 16 for takeoffs only. If you look at the taxiway pattern at LSZH you will find that 14 is constructed as a landing-only runway with taxiways leaving it at its southern end, close to the terminal, but no taxiways leading to it. That is different for rwy 16.

However, they occasionally use rwy 16 for landings as well, but never use rwy 14 for takeoffs

Source: a Swissair pilot told me this 4 years ago.


User currently offlineFightingfalcon From Switzerland, joined Feb 2001, 787 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1719 times:

They do use the Side Step in Zurich, it's called "ILS 16 Side Step Approach RWY 14", meaning it's first a ILS approach with ILS 16 and then a visual Side Step to 14. I have the Chart for that approach. I just wasn't sure if a Swing Over's the same. But from what I hear, I don't think so. But I've read somewhere that they're doing that at ZRH too...

Doesn't really matter...

Thanks



Imprezas rule!!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic ZRH Approach?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
JFK Approach Paths posted Tue May 29 2007 22:13:24 by ANITIX87
ILS / Approach Charts For LEJ / Eddp posted Fri May 18 2007 05:24:49 by AKE0404AR
Minimum Approach Speed For An A300F? posted Sat May 5 2007 23:20:09 by ConcordeBoy
Faster Approach In Bad Weather? posted Fri Apr 13 2007 06:56:19 by ALbyDAL
How Does A VOR DME Approach Work? posted Thu Apr 5 2007 16:48:37 by EKSkycargo370
Landing Approach Speeds posted Thu Apr 5 2007 08:00:01 by CupraIbiza
Landing Approach Speeds posted Thu Apr 5 2007 03:58:18 by CupraIbiza
Approach Light Systems - France posted Wed Feb 7 2007 05:27:57 by Zed
Autothrottle On Approach posted Tue Feb 6 2007 03:49:47 by HighFlyer9790
Unstable Approach Question posted Tue Jan 30 2007 11:52:06 by Jeffry747

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format