Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Thrust Reverse Types  
User currently offlineBaw2198 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 637 posts, RR: 4
Posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 6984 times:

Do some designs work better than others or more effective?
What lead me to ask the question is that on some airbus a/c some have the standard full 360 shroud moving back and some have the reverse setup as 4 doors opening at 10-2-4-8 o'clock.
Clamshell vs. cascade as well.

Thanks
Baw2198


"And remember, Keep your stick on the ice"--->Red Green
13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBio15 From Colombia, joined Mar 2001, 1089 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 6845 times:

Cascade reversers are the first you mentioned where the engine casing goes back and lets bypass flow come out in the forward direction. Since they only use bypass air as a reverse thrust generator, there is still idle core thrust being produced that counteracts a little of this reverse thrust. The clamshell and bucket type reversers reverse the entire flow (both bypass and core) and therefore are a bit more effective. I don't have too much information to get technical on the issue, but I hope this information helps you!

-Alfredo


User currently offlineConcorde1518 From United States of America, joined May 2001, 746 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 6727 times:

There was also the petal-type reversers you mentioned, with the 4 doors.


 Smile


User currently offlineJBirdAV8r From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 4491 posts, RR: 21
Reply 3, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 6723 times:

To answer the second part of your question, one would argue that clamshell reversers are somewhat more effective, as they divert 100% of the engine exhaust.


I got my head checked--by a jumbo jet
User currently offlineKBUF737 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 779 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 6702 times:

It is amazing you just asked this as I was thinking the same thing after looking at a pic of the A-320 reversers. My follow up question to this would be: Does diverting all thrust in the clamshell style result in any extra wear and tear or corrosion on the tailpipe/wing?


The tower? Rapunzel!!!!!!
User currently offlineBaw2198 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 637 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 6632 times:

Do the GE90 series engines have both the bypass and core reversing at the same time, and would a clamshell type reverser be more effective on this type?

Appreciate the info guys!!!



"And remember, Keep your stick on the ice"--->Red Green
User currently offlineDarkBlue From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 233 posts, RR: 10
Reply 6, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 6603 times:

The GE90 uses cascade reversers only. Yes, a clamshell reverser for the core would increase reverse thrust, but with the large bypass ratio of the GE90 the overall gain in reverser effectivity would be relatively small compared to smaller engines. Also, clamshells on a GE90 would weigh a lot. It's a trade-off, the increase in reverse thrust is not worth the increase in engine weight.

DB


User currently offlineBaw2198 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 637 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 6596 times:

Thanks Darkblue!!!!

Does anybody have a sketch or diagram of how the CFM ( I think its CFM ) works with the 4 doors that open for reverse. Is this type only a special request by some airlines or determined by airbus?



"And remember, Keep your stick on the ice"--->Red Green
User currently offlineFLYtoEGCC From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 947 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 6407 times:

Was just about to ask a similar question, but I found this thread and it seems relevant so I'll ask it in here.

Am I right in thinking the RR Trent 600, 800 and 900 series have cascade thrust reversers? And if so, why does the 700 series, as in use on the A330, have the four-door petal "pop-up" type described above? Is there a fundamental design difference in the engine that requires this? Or is more to do with the shaping of the engine cowling due to aerodynamic requirements, that is the main reason?

Baw2198
It is indeed the CFM56-5 series in use on the A320 and A340 family that has that type of reverser. Regarding it being a special request by airlines - that is not the case. If the airlines order CFM engines, then that is the kind of reverser they come with, unlike the IAE which has the cascade type. The CFM56-3 and 56-7 on the 737, however, also have the cascade type. (As for the first part of your question, I'm unable to answer that I'm afraid, but I'm sure there's someone who can!)

[Edited 2004-05-25 19:12:37]


Come fly with me, let's fly, let's fly away...
User currently offlineQantasA332 From Australia, joined Dec 2003, 1500 posts, RR: 25
Reply 9, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 6433 times:

Basically:

"Target" or "Bucket" or "Clamshell" reversers

Two or more clamshell deflector panels which redirects exhaust air forward. Their use is mainly on older turbojet engines, or very low bypass turbofans. Not many higher-bypass turbofans use clamshell reversers for a few reasons. One is that, like DarkBlue mentioned, they would have to be very large and heavy, and impractical on the whole. Another consideration is that, depending on the particular aircraft and engine, clamshell doors could actually hit the ground when deployed. Overall, clamshell reversers are more effective than other types (given the same engine), but not always what works best, of course.


^Clamshell reverser

"Cascade" reversers

A combination of panels to block bypass flow and opening vents on the sides of the engine to give the bypass air a place to exit. There are vanes in the vents, which redirect the flow forwards. Cascade reversers are a more practical reverse thrust mechanism for high-bypass turbofans than clamshell reversers, for the reasons mentioned already. Not many (or any, maybe?) low-bypass engined aircraft employ cascade reversers simply because there's not enough bypass air to slow the aircraft effectively enough.


^Cascade reverser

"Petal" reversers

A variation on the cascade reverser. Bypass air is redirected out of a vent and forward (by the petals). Like the cascade reverser, petal reversers are usually only used on high-bypass engine aircraft.

Cheers,
QantasA332


User currently offlineFLYtoEGCC From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 947 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 6359 times:

See - I told you there was someone who could answer!

Cheers, QantasA332  Smile



Come fly with me, let's fly, let's fly away...
User currently offlineBaw2198 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 637 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 6318 times:

Cool graphics Qantas!!!!!!  Smile Smile

FlytoEGCC thanks for getting this thread jump started again!!  Smile

Thanks everyone for the information.

Best Regards,

Baw2198



"And remember, Keep your stick on the ice"--->Red Green
User currently offlineOly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6849 posts, RR: 11
Reply 12, posted (10 years 7 months 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 6151 times:

Thrust reverser design is a bit of a black art. The 360 deg cascade on most aircraft are rather complicated because the cascades need to be designed with respect to the location on the engine. Those at the bottom of the engine try to direct the flow sideways rather than directly forward so that any debris isn't blown back onto the engine nacelle or reingested. Similarly those that might blow onto a surface on the aircraft (like on the CRJ700 where the fuselage and horizontal stabilizer might be affected) need to direct the flow away as well as forwards.

The 4 door version on the CFM engines avoids this problem. It also has the advantage that they are solid deflector doors that will act as air brakes which are more efficient than just a jet directed forwards, so the area they occupy is smaller.

The bucket reversers on the 737-200 used to be vertical before it was found that the reverse thrust directed straight down was affecting braking performance.


The ironic thing about reversers is that they are not part of any certification process, the aircraft should be able to land and stop on the brakes alone. They are there to reduce the runway length for landing and increase brake life.

Andy



wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
User currently offlineCitationJet From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 2469 posts, RR: 3
Reply 13, posted (10 years 7 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 6141 times:

The Citation X (Model 750) has clamshell reversers. During development testing, it was discovered that the nose gear could come off the ground under light weight, high thrust reversing. The solution was to put "spacers" at the back of the clamshells so that they wouldn't completely contact and close off the reverse flow. This reduced the effectiveness of the reversers and kept the nose gear on the ground.


View Large View Medium

Photo © Burke Harper


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mark Remmel



[Edited 2004-05-29 04:17:33]


Boeing Flown: 701,702,703;717;720;721,722;731,732,733,734,735,737,738,739;741,742,743,744,747SP;752,753;762,763;772,773.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Thrust Reverse Types
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Question About Thrust Reverser Types posted Tue Aug 15 2006 03:56:23 by YULspotter
Thrust Reverse Deployment posted Sat Aug 6 2005 19:50:56 by ANITIX87
Shell Thrust Reverse More Effective Than Pushback? posted Mon Sep 27 2004 20:35:04 by A340600
What With Thrust Reverse Prior To Touchdown. posted Wed Oct 29 2003 16:54:26 by RB211
767 Accident In '91-thrust Reverse Caused? posted Sun Oct 19 2003 05:59:05 by Mirrodie
Thrust Reverse On 737-300 posted Thu Sep 4 2003 21:33:02 by KL808
Thrust Reverse As Inflight Air Brake? posted Wed Jun 4 2003 21:56:58 by ConcordeBoy
Thrust Reverse Power posted Sun Apr 8 2001 02:01:47 by Bryan Becker
Thrust Reverse posted Sat Nov 18 2000 06:22:32 by Victor Hotel
Thrust Reverse With Nose Gear In The Air posted Wed Sep 27 2000 20:10:36 by Gyro

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format