Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Mexican TCAs  
User currently offlineJhooper From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 6204 posts, RR: 12
Posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1243 times:

I was looking at my south Texas WAC chart and I've noticed that TCAs in Mexico are very large. Why is this? Is their radar so primitive that they need so much positive airspace control around their large airports?


Last year 1,944 New Yorkers saw something and said something.
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAirplay From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 971 times:

Mexican TCAS? I think it says "arriba" instead of "climb"....

 Smile


User currently offlineAM From Mexico, joined exactly 15 years ago today! , 589 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 958 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I think they're actually designated TMAs, not TCAs, and yes, the radar system is somewhat primitive. Actually only a few airports' TMAs have radar service. It's like ATIS frequencies and ILS systems in this country. There isn't precisely too many of them.

A typical Mexican TMA has a 50nm radius from the airport's VOR, and goes from the ground to FL200. That IS a lot.

And if you look at Mexico City... damn... Jeppesen even had to make a special airway chart for the Mexico City area. There are 3 main airports within 50nm (MEX, by far the largest, TLC and PBC), so that makes the TMA more complex. Instead of having "independent" transitions for MEX's STARs and SIDs, all aircraft overflying the area have to fly over all the VORs that are there for arrival and departure procedures in MEX. For example, if you're flying from SAN to SFO, you'll only fly over one VOR in the LA area (LAX or SXC). High altitude airways don't depend on low altitude VORs. But it's not like that in MEX. If you're going from Dallas to Acapulco and flying over the MEX TMA, you'll have to fly over the Pachuca VOR, then Otumba, then Mexico City, then Cuautla, and finally on to Acapulco. All that just to cross MEX's airspace. All those VORs are used for SIDs and STARs in MEX. The airway system over central Mexico is too centralized over MEX. If you want to go from, say, Leon to Cancun, you have to fly over MEX, there's not a "more direct" airway. I've almost never seen direct VOR-to-VOR routings on flight plans... I don't know why it's like that.

I hope I was clear. What I'm trying to say through this example is that Mexico's airspace strucutre could be a lot simpler and more efficient if the right resources were in place.

I'm no ATCer, so I can't give you the exact reasons for your question, but I hope my reply was useful in some way.

Saludos,
Bernardo



"... for there you have been and there you will long to return."
User currently offlineJhooper From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 6204 posts, RR: 12
Reply 3, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 954 times:

Good reply Bernardo. Now I can see why we avoided Mexican airspace on my flight from DFW-HNL! We flew over LAX and then turned southwest toward Hawaii.




Last year 1,944 New Yorkers saw something and said something.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Mexican TCAs
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
GOL-Legacy Collision. Turning TCAS/xponder Off posted Wed Jan 24 2007 08:32:04 by Baron95
How Effective Is Tcas? posted Tue Oct 3 2006 21:13:39 by MarkBoston
Transponders And Tcas Low Level Question posted Tue Aug 22 2006 23:08:26 by Julianuk
SAS 737 And Light Aircraft, Tcas Incident, Norway posted Mon Jun 5 2006 21:54:00 by MerlinIIIB
Tcas False Alerts Or No Action Needed Alerts? posted Sat May 27 2006 18:48:13 by JulianUK
Automatic Control By Tcas posted Mon Mar 27 2006 06:11:26 by HAWK21M
Aircraft Head On Without Tcas posted Sun Jan 8 2006 11:38:57 by Jamesbuk
Tcas Not Standard? posted Tue Dec 27 2005 15:43:18 by Chiguire
Tcas Systems Detection Of No Transponder Aircraft posted Wed Nov 16 2005 23:33:23 by Julesmusician
Canadian/Mexican Airspace posted Tue Apr 12 2005 06:31:21 by AirWillie6475

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format