Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Vortex Generators On A MEL List?  
User currently offlineMr Spaceman From Canada, joined Mar 2001, 2787 posts, RR: 9
Posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4477 times:

Hi guys.

In the January issue of Flying magazine, there's a neat article about the Air National Guard (ANG) in Ohio. The writer explains his experience when flying in a KC-135R Stratotanker with the 121st Air Refueling Wing of the ANG of Ohio while on a mid-air refueling training mission over the eastern USA.

During the pre-flight inspections, it was noted that their KC-135R had 2 squawks/snags in the maintenance logs. The first squawk was in reference to the ADF, and the second was about vortex generators.

From the article ...............

"One vortex generator was missing from the bottom of the left horizontal stabilizer. It's okay to fly with two gone, and this was deferred to the next major maintenance."

My interpretation of the above sentence is that vortex generators (VG's) are on the KC-135's MEL list, and that the limit of missing VG's that can be deferred is only 2. If more than 2 VG's are noticed missing during a walk-around inspection, the aircraft will be grounded untill they're replaced. Have I understood this correctly?

So, my questions are .................

Do commercial airliners that use vortex generators on their wings, tails, flaps, etc, also have a set limit of VG's that can be missing in the airliner's MEL list? If the answer is yes, can someone give examples?

it would be interesting to learn that the need for such small objects could ground an airliner.



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Irfan CALISKAN
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Joe Corrigan



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Daniel Werner
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Msh744





Chris  Smile


"Just a minute while I re-invent myself"
22 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDc10hound From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 463 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4433 times:

They're in the CDL (Configuration Deviation List):

B737 CDL

55-1 Aft Body Vortex
Generators
(AFM 55-30-1)

Normal Complement :8 Required For Departure:0

* Any number may be missing.

NOTES:
1. There is no performance penalty.
2. During cruise flight, occasional vertical
motions may be felt which appear to be light
turbu lence. These mot ions are
characteristic of this airplane and should not
be construed as associated with Mach
buffet.



"Eagles soar. But weasels never get sucked into jet intakes.."
User currently offlineMr Spaceman From Canada, joined Mar 2001, 2787 posts, RR: 9
Reply 2, posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 4415 times:

Hello Dc10hound.

Thanks for your quick reply.

OK, so vortex generators are found in an airliner's CDL (Configuration Deviation List), not in the MEL.

In the case of the Boeing 737, eight Aft Body VG's are required for departure but, any number can be missing (a little confusing to me). I woner what the CDL says about the VG's on the 737's wing?

It seems to me that vortex generators can't ground an airliner ........ imagine if they could!

A 737-3 with yellow VG's.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Bradley Mortimer



A KC-135R Stratotanker.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © John Martin



Chris  Smile



"Just a minute while I re-invent myself"
User currently offlineSpacepope From Vatican City, joined Dec 1999, 2895 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 4401 times:

I think you misread that. 8 are the normal compliment, 0 are required for departure.

T.J.



The last of the famous international playboys
User currently offlineDc10hound From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 463 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 4394 times:

Let me restate this, please:

Normal Complement: 8 (Eight)

Required For Departure: 0 (Zero)

Any number may be missing.

But I see you already figured that...

 Big thumbs up

[Edited 2004-02-24 23:54:17]


"Eagles soar. But weasels never get sucked into jet intakes.."
User currently offlineMr Spaceman From Canada, joined Mar 2001, 2787 posts, RR: 9
Reply 5, posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 4389 times:

Hello Spacepope.

Thanks for pointing that out to me. I did misread what Dc10hound typed out.

I better get my act together,  Nuts or Dc10hound is going to stop replying to me!

I suspect that the location and importance of certain vortex generators dictates how many can be missing before the airline needs to replace them.

I wonder, if something like 5 or more vortex generators in a row were missing from the top surface of the wing on the 737 in the photo below, would it still be allowed to depart?


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Bradley Mortimer




Chris  Smile



"Just a minute while I re-invent myself"
User currently offlineDc10hound From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 463 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 4388 times:

Chris,

Must you ask that question?  Big grin

The short answer is, yes:

B737 CDL

57-1 Wing Vortex Generators

(AFM 57-30-6)
Normal Complement - 16

Required For Departure -14

One on each wing may be missing.

NOTE:
There is no performance penalty.

57-7 Wing Leading Edge Vortilons

(AFM 57-41-12)

Normal Complement - 6

Required For Departure - 4

One on each wing may be missing.

NOTE:
There is no performance penalty.

57-12 Outboard Flap Leading Edge Vortex Generators

(AFM 57-53-7)

Normal Complement - 14

Required For Departure - 8

Up to three non adjacent per side may be
missing provided:

- Operation with flaps 40 is not authorized.
NOTE:
There is no performance penalty.



"Eagles soar. But weasels never get sucked into jet intakes.."
User currently offlineVikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 9710 posts, RR: 27
Reply 7, posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 4385 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Can someone give a quick explanation of what these do exactly? As in, why is it necessary to generate vortices on the upper wing and h stab surface? Thanks...
~Vik



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlineDc10hound From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 463 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 4382 times:

Pop Quiz

The small yellow object just forward of Spoiler # 4 is not a vortex generator or vortilon.

What is it?



"Eagles soar. But weasels never get sucked into jet intakes.."
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 4373 times:

>>>The small yellow object just forward of Spoiler # 4 is not a vortex generator or vortilon. What is it?

While it looks like just another vortex generator, this one has another function. In the event of an evacuation using the over-wing emergency exits, there's a little length of rope/cord stored that one deploys and clips to this yellow fitting. There's also one on the opposite side of the aircraft. IIRC, you'll only see them on 737-100s and 737-200s, since Boeing discontinued them on the 737-300s and later variants.


User currently offlineIllini_152 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1000 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 4372 times:

Can someone give a quick explanation of what these do exactly? As in, why is it necessary to generate vortices on the upper wing and h stab surface? Thanks...
~Vik



I don't know what they accomplish on airliners, but on light aircraft, they disturb the boundry layer airflow and delay seperation at high angels of attack when installed on the wing. This lets you fly at a higher AoA (and lower airspeed) without stalling.

In twins, I believe it has something to do with increasing rudder authority and reducing Vmc, but as I don't have a "MEL" printed on my certificate yet, I really couldn't say  Big grin.



Happy contrails - I support B747Skipper and Jetguy
User currently offlineMr Spaceman From Canada, joined Mar 2001, 2787 posts, RR: 9
Reply 11, posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 4366 times:

Hello Dc10hound.

Thank You, for all of that information. It's appreciated! Big grin I enjoy learning about how little things can effect a big airliner's operation.

Regarding your Pop Quiz, I don't know what that yellow object is for, but I suspect it has the same purpose as the yellow object that's found on all A320's wings near the same location.

It appears to be an atachment point where a cable or hook might be used to lift the whole airliner up off a hangar floor .......... pretty far fetched eh?


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Julio Ribeiro - IBERIAN SPOTTERS



> Vikkyvik, vortex generators create a vortex which helps the airflow over a wing stay atached to the wing during high angles of atack & slow airspeeds. It helps prevent a laminar airflow's boundary layer from separating from a wings surface, thus preventing a stalling condition.


Chris  Smile





"Just a minute while I re-invent myself"
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 4359 times:

>>>Regarding your Pop Quiz, I don't know what that yellow object is for, but I suspect it has the same purpose as the yellow object that's found on all A320's wings near the same location.


Answer is in post #9


User currently offlineMr Spaceman From Canada, joined Mar 2001, 2787 posts, RR: 9
Reply 13, posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 4356 times:

Hello OPNLguy.

Thanks for the correct answer.

Well, your answer sure makes a lot more sense than mine! I wasn't serious about my answer though, I was just saying what it looked like it was for.  Laugh out loud I know that mechanics have large tripod type stands that hook into the lower sides of an airliner's fuselage for the purpose of lifting it off the ground.

You mentioned .............

you'll only see them on 737-100s and 737-200s, since Boeing discontinued them on the 737-300s and later variants

Well, not to be nic-picking but, the 737 in the Pop Quiz photo is a -376 model. So I guess Boeing waited ontill the -400 series to stop using those yellow hook-ups.

Chris  Smile



"Just a minute while I re-invent myself"
User currently offlineDc10hound From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 463 posts, RR: 5
Reply 14, posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 4357 times:

What is it?

While it looks like just another vortex generator, this one has another function. In the event of an evacuation using the over-wing emergency exits, there's a little length of rope/cord stored that one deploys and clips to this yellow fitting.

OPNLguy has it right!

It appears to be an atachment point where a cable or hook might be used to lift the whole airliner up off a hangar floor .......... pretty far fetched eh?

Why, yes, Chris that really is far fetched!!!

 Nuts






"Eagles soar. But weasels never get sucked into jet intakes.."
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 4354 times:

None of our -300s (that I know of) have them, and I just assumed that Boeing stopped installing them, since we (SWA) were a launch customer (along with USAir) on the -300. Guess they still offer them as an option...

User currently offlineFrancoflier From France, joined Oct 2001, 3718 posts, RR: 11
Reply 16, posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 4331 times:

Actually even small turboprops that use vortex generators have an item on the MEL about it.

For instance on the Jetstream 31/32, you may have no more than 2 non-adjacent vortex generators missing per side. T/O is prohibited if this condition is not satisfied.



Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit posting...
User currently offlineMr Spaceman From Canada, joined Mar 2001, 2787 posts, RR: 9
Reply 17, posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 4275 times:

Hello Francoflier.

Thanks for your info about the Jetstream 31/32.

In these photos of Jetstream Super 31's you can see the vortex generators between the engines and the fuselage (you might need to enlarge the first shot).


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © ARN Photography - Joakim Ewenson




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gary Watt



Chris  Smile




"Just a minute while I re-invent myself"
User currently offlineAJ From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 2386 posts, RR: 24
Reply 18, posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 4252 times:

We had exactly this ex-Hong Kong a few weeks back. It was a deferred defect pertaining to two vortex generators missing from the 767....you guess where!

User currently offlineMr Spaceman From Canada, joined Mar 2001, 2787 posts, RR: 9
Reply 19, posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 4250 times:

Hello AJ.

I'll take a guess as to where they were missing from...........

The leading edge of the outboard flaps on one of the wings, specifically the left wing. Big grin

You can clearly see them in this photo.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Vasco Garcia




Chris  Smile



"Just a minute while I re-invent myself"
User currently offlineLiamksa From Australia, joined Oct 2001, 308 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks ago) and read 4236 times:

For interest's sake the retrofit VG kit available for Piper Navajo/Chieftains allows a higher MTOW. This is because the one engine inoperative (OEI) rate of climb required in this category is related to the stall speed, which is lower with the addition of VGs -> can carry more weight.

Rob.


User currently offlineAJ From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 2386 posts, RR: 24
Reply 21, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 4225 times:

Close Chris, but no cigar!

User currently offlineQantasA332 From Australia, joined Dec 2003, 1500 posts, RR: 26
Reply 22, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 4195 times:

Can someone give a quick explanation of what these do exactly? As in, why is it necessary to generate vortices on the upper wing and h stab surface? Thanks...

In general, they turbulate the airflow over the wing, thus added total KE to the flow and allowing it to travel further along the wing before seperating, much like dimples on a golf ball do. This is obviously useful at close-to-stall speeds/high AoA.

I'm not sure, but I don't think that their typical usage would differ greatly between lights, twins, and airliners, however there might be some differences.

Cheers,
QantasA332


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Vortex Generators On A MEL List?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Vortex Generators On Nose Of 737NGs posted Thu Sep 7 2006 21:25:52 by Jspitfire
Curved Vortex Generators On 737's Wing? posted Tue Sep 17 2002 19:06:03 by Mr Spaceman
Any Feedback On 737 Windshield Vortex Generators? posted Sat Mar 19 2005 00:44:31 by WestWing
Vortex Generators posted Sat Jul 29 2006 18:25:20 by Arecibo
Are There Vortex Generators Under The Main Wing? posted Sat Oct 30 2004 01:06:29 by Lehpron
B767 Vortex Gen. On Flaps posted Fri Jun 11 2004 06:19:13 by Starline
What's The 'magic' Of The Vortex Generators? posted Fri Sep 19 2003 17:47:05 by Bio15
B732 EPR Gauge On MEL posted Mon Apr 22 2002 11:38:55 by HAWK21M
Vortex Generators. posted Tue Feb 26 2002 12:00:12 by LMML 14/32
Fuel Indicator On Mel? posted Fri Nov 16 2001 16:40:17 by SailorOrion

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format