Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Part 61 Or Part 141?  
User currently offlineTHAIlover From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 41 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3664 times:

Hi,

I am considering taking flight lessons at the nearby airport and I have questions and want some of your opinions.

I'm shopping around for a flight school(PPL) and the 2 cheapest I can find are differ by school, Part 61 and Part 141, and plane. I know basic principles of Part 61 and 141 but the thing is I plan to become an airliner pilot some day and many have recommended Part 141 for that professional level. After the calculation (based on 55hrs), cost for PPL of Part 61(on C-152) is about $1500 (that I could save for instrumental) than Part 141(on C-172).

I do plan to continue to advance my certificate via Part 141 school but just for a PPL, which one should I go for? Should I start Part 141 all the way up? Or should I be trained at Part 141 at the advanced course (instrument, multi..)

Thanks in advance


Getting my feet on the rudders and hands on YOKE!!!
17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGoboeing From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 2679 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3636 times:

I would do it the way that's the most convenient for you and not worry about the FAR Part that it's under. If you have a good place with good instructors with well maintained airplanes, do your training there.

You may also want to look into what types of aircraft you'd get to fly at each. One other thing, and that is, do each rating as quickly as possible. Sure, take some time after getting the PPL to fly some friends or family around, but when you're working towards a rating/license and doing one lesson after another, try to pack them close together. That way, you'll spend less time reviewing what you've forgotten since the last time you flew. I think this is especially for the instrument rating.

Nick


User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29705 posts, RR: 59
Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3619 times:

It doesn't matter if you are in a part 61 or 141 school, it is still going to take the same 300 and 1500 hours to get your Commercial and ATP licenses.

Some people get off on the fact that a private license only takes 45 hours at a 141 school. But my experience was that will be the case if you never have to repet a lesson and master every topic the day you go out and fly it.

My recommendation is to find a 61 school, preferable if you can locate an instructor that has been flying for years. A newbie instructor may be up to speed on the latest rules, but the latter is really going to show you how to handle an airplane.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineFlyf15 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3620 times:

Pick the best instructor you can find at a school you're comfortable at (be it 61 or 141)...everything else will fall into place from there.

It never hurts to shop around by taking introductory flights at more than one school and even with more than one instructor and/or in more than one airplane at the same school.


User currently offlineTHAIlover From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 41 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 3603 times:

ok...sounds good...any more suggestions?


Getting my feet on the rudders and hands on YOKE!!!
User currently offlineNormalSpeed From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 3589 times:

Either way is good, but I think that I'd probably go with 141, just because I do better with structure. If you do go with the part 61 program, make sure that the curriculum is well organized. The instructor should have their "ducks in row."

'Speed


User currently offlineFly727 From Mexico, joined Jul 2003, 1789 posts, RR: 19
Reply 6, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 3571 times:

Agree with Normal. I would go with 141 but that is just because I tend to work better within a structure rather than organizing one. That is just my opinion though.

Part 141 has somewhat tighter requirements, and tend to be more expensive as you pointed out. I would stay away from those fancy-huge academies that offer you breaking in new equipment. If money is an issue (well, when it is NOT an issue?) go to a smaller school with good well maintained airplanes. They cost a fraction of the others and basically for the same flight time.

Have you considered taking your private instruction in part 141 with Cessna 150/152 or Tomahawks? They are about 20 USD/hour cheaper over the 172!

Visit the airport and ask students the + and - of their choices. Visit your local FSDO and don't hesitate to ask anything that concerns you; this is the moment where those lifetime decisions are made!

Visit http://www.studentpilot.com and its message boards; a good tool to find answers in that special stage on which you are.

RM  Smile



There are no stupid questions... just stupid people!
User currently offlineJetguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 3535 times:

Find the instructor first then figure out how to do it. Don't put the cart before the horse. The instructor comes before the choice of school, FAR Part, even the training aircraft choice. Don't skimp on the instructor.

Jetguy


User currently offlineUSAFHummer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 10685 posts, RR: 53
Reply 8, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 3518 times:

Please delete, misinterpretation of original post on my part

Greg

[Edited 2004-03-11 04:29:54]


Chief A.net college football stadium self-pic guru
User currently offlineTHAIlover From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 41 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 3498 times:

Hi,

One question I left out, Is it possible to take Part 61 school and then switch to Part 141?, or it's not possible? I have a hard time finding the reasonable PPL from Part 141 school here in Southwestern Connecticut. There are little to none.

And for Fly727, I've look for Part 141 school in CT and the only thing I can say is they don't have C-152. Only Part 61 schools have that in CT.

Too bad for mee!!!
THAIlover



Getting my feet on the rudders and hands on YOKE!!!
User currently offlineJhooper From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 6199 posts, RR: 12
Reply 10, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 3498 times:

The CFI you pick is the single most important element in your flight training, regardless of what school you go to. What I'd do is pick a school that is certified under Part 141, find the best CFI you can, and do your training under Part 61. This way you're assured of quality training while still giving the CFI the flexibility to tailor the training program to your individual needs.


Last year 1,944 New Yorkers saw something and said something.
User currently offlineHaveBlue From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2090 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 3496 times:

I did mine part 141 in a 152 mostly, a little time in the 172. I shopped around at our many schools here in DAB and found a place that suited me the most. The 2 instructors I got were very good. My introductory flight, however, was with a good pilot but one with very poor English skills. It was important to me that I was able to communicate easily and get along with my instructor. The ones I got were stern but fair, and made me feel at ease.

I second the opinion of the others that structure worked well for me. Though I am an individualist, in something like flight training I think structure is key. Figure out what you want and need, and find the school that best suits that need.



Here Here for Severe Clear!
User currently offlineTheGreatChecko From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 1128 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 3483 times:

For your private and instrument it may not make a big deal where you go. Where it definitely does makes a BIG difference is when you want to get your Commercial License. At a Part 61 school you are required to have done 250 hours of training (FAR Part 61.129) while at a Part 141 school you are required to do 120 hours (FAR Part 141 Appendix D No. 4).

Please correct me if I am wrong, I am not the best at deciphering FAR's. But I believe if you go through a 141 school from the start you don't have to do all 120 hours of training when enrolled in the Commercial Program, you might be able to fold that into other training. That may also be the case with transferring into a Part 141 flight school when you are at that point. It may depend on how the program is structured and if the local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) allows them to do it.

Where I fly, the amount of flight training in the commercial program itself is well below 120 hours. However, by the time you are done with the commercial training you are definitely over 120 hours TT (when including PPL and instrument). This may be a an exception to the rule or it could be something common, I don't know, I never asked this question when I was flying at my local FBO.

It might be a good question to ask the particular flight schools if you are planning on going in the direction of a CSEL and CMEL license.

Sorry for being long winded  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

GreatChecko



"A pilot's plane she is. She will love you if you deserve it, and try to kill you if you don't...She is the Mighty Q400"
User currently offlineB747Skipper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 3475 times:

Friends -
xxx
Essentially, your license is no different, whether you got it 61 or 141...
What is better, a 1,000 hours CPL ex graduate of 61, or 141... no difference.
xxx
When with 2,000 hours, and having an ATPL... you will be hired by an airline, they will train you to THEIR standards, regardless of your past 61 or 141 background. Do not ever say to your airline instructor "well, in my 141 training they told us that it was not the way it should be done..." He will answer to you: "this is what OUR book says, and THAT IS IT"...
xxx
When I select pilots who were trained in USA, I have never asked (nor see the point to ask) if they have had their training under 61 or 141. It is irrelevant. I look at the substance of their experience.
xxx
Remember, for me, an ATP with a 737 or DC9/MD80 type rating tells me much more about a candidate's experience and background, rather than an ATP qualification obtained in a Navajo in a 141 program...
xxx
Numerous chief pilots or training managers share my opinion, believe me. Do not read these glossy advertisements of pilot training publications. They are often borderline of misrepresentation and false claims.
xxx
Happy contrails  Smile
(s) Skipper


User currently offlineJAL777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 3467 times:

I'm doing my PPL as part 141. I will be doing the rest as part 61. While the "structure" of part 141 can be appreciated by some, I find it better when the instructor (not some stage-check bs) has the final say.

User currently offlineCFIcraigAPA From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 223 posts, RR: 4
Reply 15, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 3463 times:

Consider that part 61 gives you more flexibility with your training. You can pick your own X-country destinations for example. I've done all my training through CFI part 61 and have enjoyed every minute of it.
Airlines don't care. They want hours and ultimately, you'll probably save money going part 61 . . . money that can be spent on some good multi time.
CM



Prior Proper Preparation Prevents Piss-Poor Performance
User currently offlineTHAIlover From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 41 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 3434 times:

Hi,

After all reading your comments, I think the best economical way for me is to take Private Pilot License with a part 61 school this summer.I then will probably be working on the rest via Part 141 next year(after collecting money needed)

Thank you all....I'll let you know my progress

THAIlover



Getting my feet on the rudders and hands on YOKE!!!
User currently offlinePilotpip From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 3139 posts, RR: 11
Reply 17, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 3 hours ago) and read 3384 times:

Most people that I talk to, regardless of the style of training, have taken about 65-80 hours to get their PPL. However, many of the time requirements for the other ratings don't apply when doing them part 141. It may save money to do the more advanced ratings part 141.


DMI
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Part 61 Or Part 141?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Part 141 Vs. 61 Comm. Question (switching FBO's) posted Wed Jun 30 2004 03:39:00 by FSPilot747
Part 141 Question posted Wed Feb 15 2006 17:04:08 by LPLAspotter
Transferring Part 141 Flight Schools posted Mon Feb 6 2006 23:10:42 by Corey07850
Part 61 Or Part 141? posted Thu Mar 11 2004 02:16:08 by THAIlover
Odd Aircraft Details, Part Deux posted Sat Jul 22 2006 17:06:52 by TripleDelta
Part-66 Module 11 B1 posted Tue Jun 6 2006 19:44:32 by A/c train
Part 121 Pilots Over 60 posted Mon Mar 13 2006 20:03:47 by Redcordes
Value Of A Part 135 Cert.. posted Tue Feb 7 2006 06:47:03 by USXguy
Easa Part 66 Essay Module posted Tue Nov 22 2005 19:09:32 by Kaddyuk
Hardest Part Of Pilot Progression posted Mon Aug 15 2005 14:07:42 by Justplanecrazy

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format