On the photo you can see that there are lots of skidmarks on the white markings these skidmarks are of aircrafts lining up. But why do the tires leave these marks?? I mean the aicraft isn't going at high speed and breaking will lining up.
CitationJet From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 2434 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (10 years 4 months 12 hours ago) and read 3852 times:
Many people don't realize it, but the ground taxi conditions produce high loads in certain parts of the landing gear. A landing gear is designed for both landing impact loads, and ground loads (taxi, towing, braked roll, turning, etc). These ground handling loads have the highest loads for certain portions of the gear design.
Boeing Flown: 701,702,703;717;720;721,722;731,732,733,734,735,737,738,739;741,742,743,744,747SP;752,753;762,763;772,773.
Avioniker From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 1109 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (10 years 4 months 11 hours ago) and read 3785 times:
A good example of the stresses placed on the gear while taxiing is the Delta 767 that sheared a main strut cylinder in Frankfurt when turning onto the gate a few years ago. Ultimately it was attributed to corrosion caused by washing the oil and grease out of the seals and off the strut but that had to be a heck of a load to cause the fracture.
Gear is good at up and down but side to side is very stressful.
One may educate the ignorance from the unknowing but stupid is forever. Boswell; ca: 1533
PW4084 From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 291 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 4 months 9 hours ago) and read 3743 times:
A lot of time you will see heavy black streaks on the lineup portion of the runway from the nosegear. If a pilot advances the throttles for a rolling takeoff before the airplane is reasonably lined up, it can leave some pretty good streaks as the nose gear is dragged to centerline under increasing thrust and sideloads.
QantasA332 From Australia, joined Dec 2003, 1500 posts, RR: 25
Reply 6, posted (10 years 4 months ago) and read 3557 times:
Yep, with all that weight on the mains, dragging can produce quite a lot of marks on taxiways/runways. Not only do turnable centre gear (like those on the 744) reduce strain for the aircraft, airports must like them because they help reduce those markings!
FutureFlyer From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 37 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (10 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 3372 times:
I know this doesn't directly relate to the topic at hand but i have one question and it is this:
Once the airplane is lined up on the runway for takeoff, does the pilot lock the nose gear into position (a straight position) so that the nose gear cannot turn left/right during the takeoff roll? I have always wondered this but never had the chance to ask, so i will now. Anyone who has the answer to this question please respond.
IMissPiedmont From United States of America, joined May 2001, 6287 posts, RR: 33
Reply 10, posted (10 years 3 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 3292 times:
"Actually it takes little Braking....." Ok. But having ridden along with a friend while taxiing a 747 or two (2 engines running at idle) I guess my memory is foggy about his leaning on the brakes to avoid running into the hangar.
I'd love to see the results when someone tried to stop a 600,000 lb plus aircraft with a 6 inch block of rubber.
Starlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17030 posts, RR: 67
Reply 13, posted (10 years 3 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 3242 times:
Coming out of the shower, I though of an exception (there are probably several).
IIRC, the DC-9 (and the MD-8x?) does not have nose wheel steering with the pedals. So if the F/O is flying the leg, the Captain will steer with the tiller during takeoff up to 80 knots and during landing under 60-80 knots.
One of the reasons for the "80 knot call" on the DC-9 is for the F/O to know that the Captain is letting go of the tiller.
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
Michand From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (10 years 3 months 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 3223 times:
I just wanted to underline what PW4084 said above... I have several times as a passenger felt how the plane more or less slides out on the runway in a skid due to that the thrust was applied a bit too much too early when they got a Clear for Take-Off already before they were lined up.
However my feeling is that this is not so common anymore, I am guessing now but it seems like it was more common back in the DC-9 days etc. Those older engines needed several seconds to spool up where as today's engines are a lot faster. I can easily see that some pilots figured this in and advanced the throttles to begin the take-off roll already on the taxi-way figuring that the thrust would come _just_ right when they were lined up and then sometimes it came faster due to temperature etc...
FredT From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2002, 2185 posts, RR: 26
Reply 15, posted (10 years 3 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 3215 times:
I attempted to control the SF34 on the takeoff roll using the tiller in the simulator... made for an interesting track down the runway! Way too sensitive... or I'm too hamfisted for the sensitivity... or both...
BTW, I do believe the DC-9 has nose wheel steering through the pedals... while the F28 did not. I am hoping for someone with the appropriate type rating to chime in with a definitive answer though.
[Edited 2004-05-06 13:09:27]
[Edited 2004-05-06 13:09:44]
I thought I was doing good trying to avoid those airport hotels... and look at me now.
DAirbus From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 593 posts, RR: 2
Reply 17, posted (10 years 3 months 4 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 3097 times:
Having worked on Delta's international 767's, I can add something to this discussion. Delta's 767ER's have a MTGW of 407,000 lbs. However, if they go over 400,000 lbs, the airline's Load Control Center or LCC has to make an adjustment for "lateral imbalance" before the final weight and balance paperwork is generated.
When I asked around to find out this adjustment was for, they told me it had to do with the side loads on the main landing gear during taxi at high gross weights. This ties into what Avioniker said in his post. I assume that the adjustment involves adding up the weights on each side of the aircraft (containers and wing fuel) and ensuring that there is less than a certain % difference between the two in order to prevent excessive side loads during taxi.
For the record, I had several flights that needed this adjustment but apart from the extra time needed by LCC to do their thing, the aircraft departed without changing the load.
"I love mankind. It's people I can't stand." - Charles Shultz
Bragi From Iceland, joined May 2001, 218 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (10 years 3 months 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 3085 times:
Many taxiways are actually more strengthened than the runway´s themselves.
Wherever possible, wider turns should be made to lessen the load on the main gear, specially with multi-wheel bogies like most large transport aircraft have.
Muhammad Ali: "Superman don’t need no seat belt." Flight Attendant: "Superman don’t need no airplane, either."