Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
738W Vs A320 : Comparison :  
User currently offlineTs-ior From Tunisia, joined Oct 2001, 3469 posts, RR: 6
Posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 3633 times:


Considering a 174Y A320 and a 174Y B738 wingletted,i request comparison regarding leasing prices, on board comfort,fuel consumption,reliability,minimum turn-around time,piloting pros and cons,cabin crew,ease of catering,...

Many thanks...

16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 971 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3546 times:

Keep in mind that Airbus advertises 164 pax in an pure Y configuration, so to squeeze another passengers 2 seat rows in, you must reduce seat pitch below 32-inches. As for the 738, Boeing intentionally made it larger than the A320. Thus it is possible to seat 174 with a respectable pitch, but I am not sure of the exact value.

User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 971 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3542 times:

Other useful links-

http://www.gecas.com/
http://www.ilfc.com/
http://www.airbus.com/product/a320_introduction.asp
http://www.airbus.com/asset/introduction.asp
http://www.boeing.com/commercial/737family/flash.html
http://www.boeing.com/bcc/flash.html


User currently offlineDan2002 From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 2055 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3543 times:

There is a lower operating cost, 95% common airframe spares, 95-100% ground equipment commonality, the window seat space is bigger, the controls are interlinked, and there is a large control displacement, the -NG famoly has greater range with max fuel, there is better engine compatability (CFM56-7B**),less fuel burn,quiter engines & low emission, the 738 climbs to FL350 12 minutes faster than the 320, the 738 has greater short field range, access to the engine is simplified cutting maintnence costs, it is the lowest cost, highest profit 170- seat aircraft,the operating costs are 12% higher for the 320, the 738 has a 17% profit advantage over the 320,there is a lower cargo door and can be easily reached from the ground and there is less need for special cargo equipment, and that provides a quicker trunaround time.

Sorry I wasnt able to post all of the numbers and such, I am in a hurry, but if you email me I will get back to you with them.

-Dan



A guy asks 'What's Punk?'. I kick over a trash can and its punk. He knocks over a trash can and its trendy.
User currently offlineHaveBlue From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2106 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 3461 times:

Dan,

What started on April 26, 2004? Referring to your signature of course.



Here Here for Severe Clear!
User currently offlineQantasA332 From Australia, joined Dec 2003, 1500 posts, RR: 25
Reply 5, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 3455 times:

...less fuel burn...

In fact, if you look at the aircraft's engine's SFCs and calculate raw fuel consumption, the two aircraft are almost identical in those terms.

Cheers,
QantasA332


User currently offlineAlitalia744 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 4748 posts, RR: 45
Reply 6, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 3450 times:

haveblue-

i'm thinking he means the day the next generation of aircraft was finally launched, the next magnificent 7-series aircraft...the 7E7.

-G



Some see lines, others see between the lines.
User currently offlineDan2002 From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 2055 posts, RR: 5
Reply 7, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 3294 times:

Alitalia744, yep you had it right, look at the topic, the first reply said, well, what my sig says now.


-Dan



A guy asks 'What's Punk?'. I kick over a trash can and its punk. He knocks over a trash can and its trendy.
User currently offlineQ330 From Australia, joined Dec 2003, 1460 posts, RR: 21
Reply 8, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 3277 times:

Dan2002, I find it hard to believe that anyone would actually buy the A320 if your figures were correct. What is your source?

-Q



Long live the A330!
User currently offlineAvioniker From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 1109 posts, RR: 11
Reply 9, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 3272 times:

It's my belief that the bean counters are in love with their blinders.
The initial acquisition cost for the A320 family are significantly less than the 737NG's (and that makes them highly attractive to a company that wants new and cheap) but once the ashtrays get full it's another story all together.
I used to supervise a ramp with both classic 737's and 320's and I could count on a 737 being done with two people max even with an A check. The 320's were another story entirely. You needed Avionics, composites, and at least one good mechanic on every plane. A and B checks were another nightmare. Smoking clamps, delaminated panels and, God Forbid, a lightning strike should have gone unreported. That plane wasn't going anywhere easy.
I'm certain the labor and training costs haven't been accounted accurately or completely by anyone that I know of. I simply can't abide by the figures Airbus gives.
I just know that it took a heck of a lot more effort to get a bus out in the morning than a Boeing if there was any scheduled inspection on the overnight.



One may educate the ignorance from the unknowing but stupid is forever. Boswell; ca: 1533
User currently offlineDan2002 From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 2055 posts, RR: 5
Reply 10, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 3267 times:

Q330, Boeing, and its not like I am taking everything they say verbatim, but you have to consider the deals that Airbus gave for the 320, and much of what I posted is almost common knowlage in this forum.


-Dan



A guy asks 'What's Punk?'. I kick over a trash can and its punk. He knocks over a trash can and its trendy.
User currently offlineQantasA332 From Australia, joined Dec 2003, 1500 posts, RR: 25
Reply 11, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 3257 times:

According to Airbus (most of these are direct quotes), the A320 family:

-Has the widest seats of any other aircraft in its class (namely the 737NG family)
-Has the widest aisle of any other aircraft in its class
-Is the widest single-aisle aircraft of any other in its class
-Has faster boarding and deplaning times than any other aircraft in its class
-Has larger overhead stowage bins than any other aircraft in its class
-Has a better dispatch reliability than any other aircraft in its class
-Is the world's most profitable single-aisle family
-Has unmatched cargo capability
-Has the most modern fly-by-wire technology on the market
-Has the lowest fuel burn of any other aircraft in its class
-Has the lowest emissions of any other aircraft in its class
-And, finally, has the smallest noise footprint of any other aircraft in its class

In no way do I believe all of the above. The point I'm trying to make is that those sorts of claims must be taken with a grain of salt, and not treated as end-all be-all fact. From Airbus or Boeing, it doesn't matter.

Cheers,
QantasA332


User currently offlineMusapapaya From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 1089 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 3226 times:

but the airbuses are more quiet...
and the 'skills' of assembly is better?
I flew on a new ryaniar 738, and the areas next to the window is vibrating and making noises... while this is not happening on a older 320, can anyone explain this?




Lufthansa Group of Airlines
User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 13, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3234 times:

Has the most modern fly-by-wire technology on the market

An interesting assertion, and one that became true only recently. The 320 now has the FBW system of the 346 standard.

There is a lower operating cost, 95% common airframe spares, 95-100% ground equipment commonality, the window seat space is bigger, the controls are interlinked, and there is a large control displacement, the -NG famoly has greater range with max fuel, there is better engine compatability (CFM56-7B**),less fuel burn,quiter engines & low emission, the 738 climbs to FL350 12 minutes faster than the 320, the 738 has greater short field range, access to the engine is simplified cutting maintnence costs, it is the lowest cost, highest profit 170- seat aircraft,the operating costs are 12% higher for the 320, the 738 has a 17% profit advantage over the 320,there is a lower cargo door and can be easily reached from the ground and there is less need for special cargo equipment, and that provides a quicker trunaround time.

Half truths and assertions.

N


User currently offlineLeskova From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 6075 posts, RR: 70
Reply 14, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 3204 times:

but you have to consider the deals that Airbus gave for the 320

Good grief, we're back to that one again? I had hoped that this line had finally gone away, but I guess it really is here to stay.

Dan2002, do you honestly think that airlines such as Air France, British Airways, Lufthansa, United, South African Airways, Finnair and TAM all only bought the A320 series because the acquisition costs were low?

An salesperson with that attitude would be thrown out the door of most, if not all, airlines within minutes of his arrival.

It just does not work that way: airlines don't buy planes based on the acquisition price alone - if they know that they'll be paying for their selection within a short timeframe, such as your numbers suggest, they won't make that selection... only the most desperate of airlines would make a selection based on acquisition cost and short term savings, all others take the long term effect into consideration.

And using figures from Airbus' or Boeing's website in a discussion such as this... please...

TS-IOR, if you want or need reliable numbers, contact ILFC, GECAS or other leasing companies - they'll be able to give you those numbers (but I'd really have a good concept about a startup carrier available when contacting them - don't think they're likely to give out those numbers to anyone asking).

Regars,
Frank



Smile - it confuses people!
User currently offlineGKirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 24932 posts, RR: 56
Reply 15, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 3040 times:

BTW, you can get 180 pax in a 320 and 189 in a 738  Big grin


When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 16, posted (10 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2984 times:

Avitas is the best source for such numbers, and each publication the 738/320 and 73G/319 jockey back and forth for position.

N


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic 738W Vs A320 : Comparison :
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
B737 Vs A320 Whine posted Tue Feb 19 2002 00:48:18 by Pelforthb
A320 Series Vs. B737 posted Mon Apr 3 2006 19:44:03 by Frequentflyer
Need Tech And Ops Specs For A320 Vs. B757 posted Thu Sep 9 2004 20:06:50 by Bahadir
737 Vs A319/A320 Gear Length posted Thu Jul 12 2001 18:48:29 by BUFjets
Fuel/Cost Per Seat: 737 Vs. Widebodies? posted Fri Dec 15 2006 05:01:09 by DfwRevolution
74x Vs. 34x posted Wed Dec 13 2006 19:59:41 by Frequentflyer
Vzrc Vs Vso: Attn. Bellerophon posted Sun Dec 10 2006 17:45:39 by Redcordes
A320 Nose Wheel Steering Faults... posted Sun Nov 19 2006 23:04:52 by Kaddyuk
Aircraft Vs Race Cars: Temps, Wear And Tear, Etc posted Thu Nov 2 2006 07:34:20 by TimePilot
DC-8 Vs 707 Today posted Tue Oct 31 2006 05:49:17 by DLKAPA

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format