Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Numbering Parallel Runways  
User currently offlineRedngold From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 6907 posts, RR: 40
Posted (15 years 3 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 4739 times:

Given that runways are numbered according to compass heading, 0/36 being due north, 9 being due east, 18 being due south, and 27 being due west.

I've noticed that there's a system of assigning L, R, and C to three parallel runways.

However, in cases of four or more parallel runways (i.e. at DFW) there's a problem so one pair of runways is numbered one degree higher/lower.

Lately, though, I've noticed yet another way that this is handled -- the two longest runways are marked as parallels and the shorter is assigned a different number. For example, at PHL three runways are parallel (except for a 0.1-degree difference). The two longer runways are marked 9L/27R and 9R/27L, while the shorter runway is marked 8/26.

The proposed third runway at CLE is marked the same way as PHL's -- although it appears to be parallel to the 5/23 parallels, it is marked as 6/24.

Why are PHL's runways not marked 9R/27L, 9C/27C, and 9L/27R?

Can someone explain the logic of this to me?


Up, up and away!
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineSailorOrion From Germany, joined Feb 2001, 2058 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (15 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 4702 times:

afaik it is just a recommendation to designate a runway by compass heading + (L/C/R), not a rule, so in case of , say 4 parallel runway you can have 7R, 8R, 7L, 8L, this is used all over the world...

User currently offlineBuff From Australia, joined Mar 2007, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (15 years 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 4684 times:

There are ICAO recommended practices that determine how successive parallel runways are numbered. (Someone else can chase down the actual convention!)

One thing that precludes a "C" designation is the distance between it and the "L", "R" parallels. Toronto is preparing to build yet a sixth runway upon completion of its fifth runway. The north (currently) single parallel had its designation changed from 24R/06L to 23/05 as the south runways are to be designated 24 L & R/06 R & L. Eventually, the north parallels will be designated 23 L & R/05 R & L.

Those of us who use the airport a lot feel all the additional runways that have been built or are about to be built would more properly be designated as very wide, expensive, well-lit taxiways.

Thanks GTAA.

Best Regards,


User currently offlineBEW From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (15 years 3 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 4630 times:

At Frankfurt (EDDF) they have two runway designations for the same piece of runway. The two parallel runways are 25L/R 07L/R, with a magnetic track of 250/070.
On runway 25L they made a High Approach Landing System, which offers the possibility to reduce wake turbulence separation for medium and light aircraft to the permissible radar separation minima. For this purpose they made a second threshold 1500m down runway 25L. This threshold is designated 26L, and there is also an ILS and papi for this threshold. So the approaches ILS DME Rwy 26L and ILS Rwy 25L is for the same strip of runway.
I don't know how much they use it though. I never go to Frankfurt, just saw it in the Jeppesen.

Regards \BEW

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Numbering Parallel Runways
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Question About Parallel Runways! posted Thu Feb 13 2003 18:30:05 by Spotterboy
Numbering Parallel Runways posted Mon Feb 12 2001 04:53:55 by Redngold
Close Parallel Runways, Continued posted Tue Oct 10 2000 01:55:23 by Timz
Closed Runways posted Wed Aug 9 2006 23:37:01 by ALbyDAL
Parallel Runway Ops posted Tue Aug 8 2006 04:34:04 by Adipasqu
TORA, LDA, And 2 End Displaced THR Runways posted Sat Jul 29 2006 09:49:02 by Bio15
Switching The Runways posted Thu Jul 27 2006 03:57:25 by HPLASOps
Airport Runways As Raceways posted Mon Jun 26 2006 03:20:25 by Airwave
Engine Numbering Terminology. posted Thu Jun 15 2006 14:18:52 by HAWK21M
Tyre Rubber On Runways posted Wed Jun 14 2006 19:27:12 by HKA

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format