Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Near Miss Or?  
User currently offlineLschweitzer From France, joined Nov 2000, 17 posts, RR: 0
Posted (15 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1580 times:

Hi there,

I came back from Dublin on Air Lingus (A321) yesterday evening. We were crusing over London I believe when the plane shacked rather violently,but only once (like a rather strong turbulence).

The pilot made the following announcement: we just experienced a turbulence created by a plane flighing by rather closely.

Now my question:
I believe that planes flying on the same altitude have to be at least 50 km away from each other and about 1000 m altitude difference.
Lets suppose a plane flies at 900km/h (I know it is a bit slower, but makes maths easier...). It takes a plane about 1min to fly 15 km (flying at 900km/h), roughly 3 min for 50 km.
I believe that a 747 taking off prevents a small plane like an Airbus 320 from taking off or landing for about 2 min. I suppose that there are turbulences for about 2 min (simplifying as turbulences in the air are different then turbulences on the ground, am I right pilotes?).

So if it takes 3 min to fly 50 km and it takes 2 min for turbulences to disappear, does this mean that the other plane was at the most 30 km away from my plane? A smaller plane would have been closer, as it produces less turbulences and yet we could feel the turbulences.

Now the question, what is the age of the pilot? Just kidding the real question is: was this close? I am not sure about turbulences created by  a plane flying by, but on a different altitude.


1 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineMd11man From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (15 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1554 times:


I know that when planes fly in a path, the planes have to over 3 - 5 miles apart to reduce turbulence , any further away then there would be no turbulence. So may be there was a aircraft closer than U think!!

For example: If U ever stood in the viewing area outside heathrow airport then U would see the aircrafts approaching the runway, and they are approx 3 miles apart, depends on the size of aircraft, also I know that they would be approaching at a speed of 300 m/hr and then slowing down to 190 m/hr when landing.

So maybe this helps.

May be the pilot was covering up.



Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Near Miss Or?
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Near Miss - What Should I Do? posted Sun Aug 24 2003 02:27:42 by Ajaaron
Near Miss At YVR posted Thu Nov 21 2002 05:50:51 by Deaner
Video: Wingtip Vortice Or Wind Sheer? posted Sat Dec 16 2006 19:01:09 by HaveBlue
777 Or 744 During Turbulences posted Sat Dec 9 2006 18:28:48 by LY777
Pitch Up (or Down) After Disegage Of Autopilot posted Wed Dec 6 2006 07:29:34 by SuseJ772
How Did A Jt4 Powered B707 Or DC8 Sound? posted Sun Dec 3 2006 22:46:01 by 747400sp
Are Delta MD88 Powered By JT8 217 Or 219 posted Sun Dec 3 2006 00:37:39 by 747400sp
To Soap Or Not To Soap? posted Tue Nov 28 2006 08:04:19 by Turbonytro
Funny Or F&*(@$# Up Write Ups..... posted Fri Nov 24 2006 03:02:17 by Zvocio79
Why 2 Engines More Efficient Than 3, Or 4? posted Thu Nov 16 2006 03:13:12 by MarkC

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format