Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
VHF Radios-Standard For A Particular Model?  
User currently offlineBodobodo From Canada, joined May 2000, 553 posts, RR: 10
Posted (15 years 3 months 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 2659 times:

I do a lot of monitoring of ATC frequencies from home which is maybe about 20 miles from the airport. There seems to be a large variation in the quality of transmissions from plane to plane. I can rarely hear planes once they are on the ground but on occasion I can hear an individual plane ask for pushback quite clearly. Some planes landing are much clearer than others even though they are following the same approach pattern for the same runway. I realize that the reception can vary from day to day but this is using the same scanner in the same location and within a 20 minute period so I'm assuming the variation in the signals received is due to the individual radio equipment in the aircraft. I'm wondering if the radio equipment that comes with each model of plane is standardized or does each customer specify particular equipment. For example does each 777 have the exact same radio equipment. Do the airline's technicians do a lot of tweaking on their own.


3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineAirplay From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (15 years 3 months 1 week 3 hours ago) and read 2606 times:

Newer large aircraft (757, 777, A320 etc) have very few options when it comes to VHF Communications. They typically use an ARINC 700 series unit (A standard for form and function) which are controlled digitally. More than one manufacturer including Rockwell/Collins and Honeywell/AlliedSignal and Sextant Avionique make these radios that are designed to be interchangeable.

Older aircraft (DC-9 727, L1011) use older ARINC 500 standard units which are also manufactured by many different companies.

All of these "airline" radios are designed to have similar performance but there are more factors involved.

For instance, all airliners have 2 or 3 (or more) units installed. The primary (#1) unit usually has it's antenna on the top of the airplane and the secondary unit has it's antenna on the bottom. VHF is transmitted in the line of site so if a 747 is transmitting on the ground from #2, it will have longer range than #1 because its several feet higher.

Also, the quality of the transmission is only as good as the pilot's microphone. Some of these microphones are regularily plugged with everything from cigarette tar to coffee (and other stuff...ewww). The microphones are specially constructed with air vents on either side so that sound which is allowed to enter both sides "cancels" and sound entering only one side (the guy's voice) does not cancel. When the air vent on the back of the microphone is clogged, the noise cancelling feature is defeated and you get a poor transmission.

The only other thing I have to offer, is that VHF communications is AM (amplitude modulated) and is susceptible to man made interference like electric motors, transmission lines, etc., and not so man made interference like lightning. You may find that reception is better when the neighborhood is quieter (less electrical interference). An outdoor antenna may help if you don't already have one.

User currently offlineBodobodo From Canada, joined May 2000, 553 posts, RR: 10
Reply 2, posted (15 years 3 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 2590 times:

Thanks for the response. I was worried that nobody was going to bother responding.


User currently offlineAvt007 From Canada, joined Jul 2000, 2132 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (15 years 3 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 2578 times:

Airplay, you know your stuff! Also, some a/c did come with a choice of suppliers. For example, the Dash 8 could be ordered with Bendix/King or Collins radio packages. The autoflight package was Honeywell on all a/c. The Collins was far better, showing their heritage in airline avionics. As for ARINC equipment, again, I`d say Collins produced some of the best. A bit over engineered, but good quality. On the point of "tweaking", that isn't done ,as it just screws things up. A lot of engineering went into making them work, and the bench tech isn't going to improve things by tweaking.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic VHF Radios-Standard For A Particular Model?
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
New Exhaust Standard For Airplane Engines posted Fri Apr 7 2006 16:06:24 by Azstagecoach
Is This Hte Standard For Crew Rest On Airbus? posted Thu Dec 16 2004 19:33:00 by Mirrodie
What Is The Power Of VHF Radios On Airliners? posted Sun Oct 10 2004 23:25:31 by KDTWFlyer
VHF Frequency Charts For Europe? posted Thu Apr 25 2002 05:19:54 by Wardialer
VHF High Alt. Frequencies For Eastern Europe posted Fri May 3 2002 22:25:49 by Wardialer
Typical G-Forces For A Commercial Flight? posted Mon Dec 18 2006 03:50:48 by N243NW
Question For Continental Mechanics posted Thu Dec 14 2006 23:32:37 by Charlienorth
Countries Using Metric Altitudes For ATC posted Thu Dec 14 2006 22:18:37 by Viscount724
My Idea For Push-Back Ops... posted Wed Dec 13 2006 02:44:39 by VANGUARD737
Simulator Time For Light GA posted Mon Dec 11 2006 07:30:01 by Soku39

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format