Sponsor Message:
Aviation Trip Reports Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
New York To London To Bologna On British Airways  
User currently offlineAT From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1188 posts, RR: 0
Posted (14 years 11 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 8176 times:

British Airways

New York JFK to London LHR 744
London LHR to Bologna BLQ 734
Bologna BLQ to London LHR 319
London LHR to Newark EWR 777

This is my first trip report so I beg your forgiveness in advance if it is not up to the standard of some of the other reports posted.

1. JFK to LHR
My Aircraft was a Boeing 747-400 "lite" (City of New York) , in the new Union Flag colors. The aircraft was in immaculate condition, and very elegantly appointed; the color blue was the theme in all classes .

The aircraft was in the "new" four-class configuration, which meant:

1) New Club World seats (flat bed). These looked absolutely wonderful, although I still can?t get over half the seats facing backward!
2) The New World Traveller Plus (more about this later).
3) Enhanced Seating in Economy with better legroom, plush seats with adjustable winged head -rests, and personal TVs.

I was in World Traveller. I had the starboard window seat in the second-last row of the plane, which means I only had one passenger sitting next to me rather than two. That really makes a difference!
The flight took off and landed on time. The service was on the whole good, perhaps not as individualistic as Virgin?s, but certainly better than most airlines. This was the day-time flight, so instead of dinner and breakfast, we were served lunch (poached salmon or lemon chicken) and snack .
The entertainment system was fine, although more channels could have been provided.
Take off and landing were on time.

2. London LHR to Bologna BLQ

The aircraft was a Boeing 737-400 (G-DOCD) with the "Africa" tail.
The aircraft looked old, especially after the Jumbo. Almost half the plane was in the Club-Europe configuration Just as we were about to depart the captain announced that all passengers would have to disembark with their baggage, as the plane had been sitting in the hangar and had not undergone it?s security check before being boarded. As a result, we took off an hour late. The flight itself was nice. Seats were extremely comfortable (with the new blue leather interiors), and legroom was more generous than on the 747s, I thought. (is this correct?) We had a lovely view of the Alps en route . Even on this short hop a full lunch was served (pasta salad, or smoked salmon sandwiches) [And yet, American carriers insist on using the excuse of flights being too short to serve meals!?!]
Bologna airport was a joke. Our 737 and another 737 from BA subsidiary Go were the only aircraft in sight. There were no jet bridges; we were ferried by bus to the terminal.

3. Bologna to London LHR
The aircraft was an Airbus 319 (G-EUPJ), in the new "union flag" colors.

My flight was at 8 am; this time the airport was more alive, with an Air France B 737, Volare A 3210 an Alitalia and Meridana MD80, and some Alitalia Regional Jets. Again, a full breakfast was served on this short hop, and we arrived in to Terminal 1 on time.

I had six hours to spare until my flight at 3pm to Newark, so I went out of the terminal into the spectator gallery . On this day runway 9R was being used for Departures and 9L for arrivals so we had an exciting view of take-offs. An El-Al Boeing 747-200 did a go-around twice, for reasons that were never clear.

4. London LHR to Newark EWR

The aircraft was a Boeing 777-200(G-VIIT). This one was powered by GE Engines, and was in the "Rendezvous" color scheme [the chinese characters].

My eyes dropped when I boarded. The aircraft was spotlessly clean, and was perhaps the most beautifully fitted aircraft I?ve flown in. Again, the aircraft was in the four class configuration, which has the added effect of making you feel less of a "tunnel" environment as the aircraft is sub-divided into so many small zones. In contrast, Virgin?s Economy class on its 747s seems like an endless tube. I had originally been assigned a window seat but as I went to the gate I found out I was bumped to a middle seat- and that too of the middle section. I don?t know how that happened, but in any case Irefused to take that seat, and was upgraded to World Traveller Plus.

The service was identical to World Traveller, but the seats were more comfortable, with their own leg-rests and power points. Food was very good and a plenty (I had the goan curry) and was followed by a snack and even icecream. The crew on this flight were fantastic- as friendly and courteous as just about any I have encountered. My cockpit request was granted, and I got a lovely view from the flight deck. Both pilots had transferred from the 747-400 because they preferred this plane.
We landed at EWR absolutely on time.

All four of my flights were good, and the last one in particular (LHR to EWR on the 777) was one of my favorite!

So Would I fly them again? Absolutely!
And the million dollar question: Which did I prefer: Virgin or British Airways?

Each one had its own plusses but all in all I would have to rate BA over Virgin

Bigger Network: they fly just about everywhere!
Better connections
Better mileage program.
Nicer planes:
More comfortable seats
More comfortable and elegant cabins
More types of aircraft
Terminal 4 at Heathrow much nicer than Terminal 3

Better overall inflight service
Better food (quality and quantity)
Better amenity kits, even in Economy

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineKlmfan From Austria, joined Jun 2001, 445 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (14 years 11 months 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 7924 times:

Nice trip report!
I agree that BA is an excellent airline. I've only been on two BA flights so far (I normally fly KLM/NWA) but I would fly BA again anytime.
Last year I was on VIE-LHR-VIE. VIE-LHR was an A319 (or 320). Lunch was very good, FAs were friendly, and there was enough leg room! I don't know the name of tail artwork but it looked "Scottish" (like a kilt).
LHR-VIE was a B757. I wonder why they use such big plane for this short flight (2h). Again everything was excellent! This time the tail artwork was light blue with white birds (doves?). The tail artworks look are really nice.

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Charles Falk

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Michael F. McLaughlin

User currently offlineAirnewzealand From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 2549 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (14 years 11 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 7903 times:

Great trip report. Many say BA is becoming a better airline each time they fly them!! Could they be coming close to Emirates and SQ??


User currently offlineRyanb741 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2002, 3222 posts, RR: 15
Reply 3, posted (14 years 11 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 7896 times:

INHO BA is already ahead of SQ if you take Biz and Firstclasses into account. I still put EK ahead though - they have set the standards by which other airlines will be judged.

I used to think the brain is the most fascinating part of my body. But, hey, who is telling me that?
User currently offlineAirblue From San Marino, joined May 2001, 1828 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (14 years 11 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 7886 times:

Great trip report!!

Just a question if you remember which was the Volare A321/200 you saw in BLQ destination??
Is it Zurich as a code-sharing with SR??

Thanks Smile

User currently offlineAT From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1188 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (14 years 11 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 7875 times:

no, I think the Volare A320 was going to Prague, I'm not 100% sure. But it definitely was not going to Zurich.

User currently offlineAirblue From San Marino, joined May 2001, 1828 posts, RR: 11
Reply 6, posted (14 years 11 months 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 7874 times:

Thanks a lot,

cause I'm traing to know where Volare based their A320/A321 for this summer.So the A320 in BLQ is used for charters.Also I heard they use some A320 for code-sharing with SR to fedeer ZRH hub, but probably not from BLQ.


User currently offlineILOVEA340 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 2100 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (14 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 7802 times:

very nice report. There new interiors are great.

User currently offlineILOVEA340 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 2100 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (14 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 7792 times:

how are the BA econ seats in the 777?

User currently offlineIronminds From Australia, joined Apr 2001, 556 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (14 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 7780 times:

nice. do you think it's worth requesting a seat back in those seats at the end of the plane, or taking your chances on seeing if there's a middle guy in a more forward 3some?

User currently offlinePjack From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2000, 54 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (14 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 7726 times:

You must have flown with a different British Airways to me. The one I flew with recently the cabin crew were apathetic gave bad service and the airplanes were old and tatty inside. The cabin crew were nowhere to be seen for about 4 hours and we were served only 2 drinks in 10 hours.

Would I fly with them again

Yes, Only because I have already booked the flight. But after that I will avoid them at all costs. United and Canadian are miles better - Good service without the BS.


User currently offlineHepkat From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 2341 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (14 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 7723 times:

Pjack, as awful as it might sound, it probably had to do with the route you flew. JFK is perhaps the most lucrative route for BA, so I imagine the service and aircraft will be top-notch. I remember flying the inaugural 777 EWR-LHR service a few years ago, and WOW, it was superb. The aircraft was brand sparkling new. On the other hand, my flight from LHR to KIN (Jamaica), which is mostly a tourist destination, was crammed full, with, and I'm sure I'm not mistaken, 10 abreast on the 777. Although the service was very good, I felt like a sardine the entire trip.

User currently offlinePjack From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2000, 54 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (14 years 10 months 1 week 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 7696 times:

Dear Hepkat

I am not disputing the equipment just the service from BA


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic New York To London To Bologna On British Airways
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Trip reports only! Other topics here
  • If criticizing an airline, express yourself in a dignified manner.
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AA: New York To California posted Fri Mar 26 2004 19:57:54 by VSLover
USAirways New York To Ft Lauderdale And Back posted Fri Feb 1 2002 00:45:33 by AT
Taipei To Kota Kinabalu On TransAsia Airways posted Wed Jan 2 2002 11:48:05 by Alexchao
Air India : New York To London posted Tue Aug 28 2001 20:03:31 by AirIndia Elite
Pittsburgh To Hilton Head On US Airways posted Thu Jul 26 2001 17:10:44 by ViperGJV
GLA - LHR - GLA On British Airways posted Sat Dec 3 2005 22:02:13 by Keysman73
LGW-AMS On British Airways Economy posted Tue Apr 26 2005 21:06:09 by ClassicLover
BRU-LHR-BRU On British Airways posted Wed Oct 8 2003 19:25:18 by American 767
MXP-LHR And Back On British Airways posted Thu Nov 7 2002 19:19:05 by MIAspotter
LGW - MBJ On British Airways Club World posted Fri Sep 7 2001 12:46:17 by BCal DC10

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format