Sponsor Message:
Aviation Trip Reports Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CDG-AMS-HKG With AF/KL In Y (Photos – Delay)  
User currently offlineTGV From France, joined Dec 2004, 874 posts, RR: 20
Posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 14384 times:

It has been a long time my last trip report (see link below, it is impossible to make a direct link), but I have been working/travelling too much and I did not have time for writing.
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-fo...ts/read.main/99438/?threadid=99438

But now I have some more time, so here we are:

PRE-TRIP

Since June I flew 2 times between CDG and HKG and return.
The first time with KL in C (unfortunately C is only allowed in case of emergency by my company now), the second with AF in Y.

For my third flight, the Y fare on AF was 50% higher than CX for the same days.
In addition AF flights to HKG are using 777, which is a plane I don't like, (noise, plus ventilation system than gives me headaches for flights longer than 6 hours. Without even mentioning the dreadful 10 abreast config AF is squeezing in the 77W now. But the schedules I wanted used a 772, still in 9 abreast config).

So I searched another option, and as KL was in the same range of price than CX, I decided to go with KL:
-to check the Y KL product (my last long haul flight with them was 12 years ago),
-and to get FB miles.
As I am really used to the AF long haul service (107 flights in Y during the last 10 years) I wanted to see the difference between the "sister airlines”.

The ticket was bought by my company travel agency, with seat 9B assigned for the outbound AMS-HKG flight, and not seat for the inbound.

When I checked on the AF website (using my FB number to access the reservation), seat 9B was indeed appearing, but with the mention "not available".

So I tried to select seats for the flights.
For 3 weeks I connected to my booking through the AF website every 2 days, but all good seats (in the front Eco cabin of the KL 744 that have an original arrangement with rows of 3+2 seats on the left, and a huge galley on the right) appeared systematically blocked. And the return flight was not accessible.


In addition only half of the front cabin was shown (rows 9 to 14 -- completely booked) while the back of the cabin (rows 15 to 18) was not even displayed.

After all these useless efforts I finally called the AF hotline for Elite Plus members, but the lady was seeing the same seats than on the website (and all already booked). She supposed that KLM was blocking theses seats for its own use.

So in the end I did the OLCI the day before the flight and then the small cabin was nearly empty and I was able to get seat 12E, near the wall. I did not mind not to have a window seat as it would be a night flight.

Globally the pre-selection of seats (for an Elite Plus member) was totally ineffective. Not a very good start for the trip!


TRIP

Monday 6th October 2008
I left my home on the southern part of Paris at 10:15 in taxi, and arrived at CDG terminal 2F at 10:53.

I went to the single business counter luggage drop-off of the Schengen area pier, where 2 passengers were in line, behind a man that had obviously some difficulties, as the agent was on the phone. Having to make phone calls for a simple luggage drop-off is not a good sign!

This went on during 2 to 3 minutes, and the line behind me was getting longer (we were now 7). Fortunately a supervisor intervened promptly, and directed the first passenger to a normal business check-in counter on one side, bypassing the "normal" queue (but these passengers had other counters opened for them), and staffed another counter with an agent that was working at the eco check-in counters, where there was not queue.

This sped up the process and at 11:03 my luggage was checked, and I left, while the "problem" man was still stuck at his counter.

I went to the safety check at 11:05: the "normal" queue had around 20 persons for 2 operating scanners, but there was no queue at the Accès n°1 line. I passed there, thanks to my Platinum card, and at 11:08 I had finished to repack my computer, put again my belt, etc., etc. (fortunately I did not have to remove my shoes).

I gave some phone calls and then went to the lounge.


I arrived just in time to get the last croissants for a late breakfast, as they were changing for the lunch products.


So I got an early lunch as well then went to walk around and take some pictures.






Apparently newspapers are not given in the jetways anymore, but in the main hall itself. This is better because passengers can read them while waiting to board, and, by not stopping at the jetways entrance to pick-up newspapers, they will not slow down the boarding process.



The boarding time on my OLCI boarding pass was 12:05, but at the gate the display was mentioning 12:18.


Flight AF1740/KL2012: CDG-AMS
A 321 F-GTAT
Scheduled 12:45 -- 14:00
Real 12:52 (+0:07) -- 14:00 (-)
Seat 17A
Load factor: 85-90% (Eco)

The boarding started at 12:19, with rows 25 to 35, Elite and Elite Plus passengers being able to board at their convenience (but no specific line to do so).

The boarding was uneventful, using the glassed jetways that enable to have a good view of the apron while boarding and that are therefore far better than opaque jetways:


The plane was clean, as where other AF planes in view.




Boarding was finished at 12:39, and passenger counting was made by the crew at 12:44.

An aircraft parked at the international pier on the left hand side of our plane pushed back just before us, using a remotely controlled tractor that was quite funny to look moving around alone. First time I notice that in CDG (or any airport in reality).




At 12:49 the captain welcomed us on board and told us we would start within one minute. In reality this minute turned into 3, as we had to wait for the plane shown in the picture above to clear the way.

So we pushed back at 12:52, and taxied to the northern runways (on the terminal 1 side). We reached the runway at 13:04 and, we took off at 13:06, after a VN 777 bound for HAN.


At 13:16 the snack service was started, here is my meal (I selected water but soft drinks, juices, beer and wines were also available, as well as coffee or tea).


The sandwich was edible.

The AF inflight magazine had a special issue for the 75th anniversary of the company and gave some interesting figures, such as the fact that 900 000 bottles of champagne are drunk on-board AF flights every year!

The captain updated us on the routing, and the descent started at 13:29, for a smooth landing at 13:53.
Some taxi and we were at gate C9 in Schipol at 14:00, exactly on-time.
A (the only?) Surinam Airways 743.


Being in row 17 I exited the plane at 14:07 only, and stopped at a transfer automatic machine to check the status of my connecting flight: gate G4, that's some walking from C9, and boarding was already commenced, so I started my in-house travel (but I really prefer to be able to walk from one plane to the other).




I arrived at the immigration counters (to exit the Schengen area) at 14:15. 6 desks were opened, with around 30 persons for each desk, but the process was fast and I passed at 14:20, with a friendly "Merci - Bon voyage" in French from the immigration officer.

Some more walking and I arrived at gate G4 at 14:34 after having got a view on the aircraft.


There was a security check to enter the gate area. Seeing some water bottles on the side, I asked the guy before the scanner if I could keep a bottle of water I had taken in the lounge in CDG, he told me yes. But the lady at the canner saw it in my bag and asked me to drop it.
This is an inconvenient of having the safety check just before the gate.

At 14:40 the flight crew arrived (which seemed late to me, for a flight supposed to leave at 15:20).

At 14:44 an announcement was made, in English, Dutch and then Chinese: there was a technical problem in the plane, and a delay was to be expected. More information later.

At 15:02 an update was given: more information in 15 minutes, stay near the gate.

It must be noted that the number of seats after the security check being lower than the number of passengers (even for a 744 Combi) some had to stand.

At 15:38 we were informed that the problem would not be solved with this plane, and that they were looking for another plane.

At 15:41 the captain took the mike to give us more details: it was an electrical problem, and a long search was expected to find the faulty wire. So another plane would be used, more information in 5/10 minutes.

At 15:48 the captain was on again, informing us that a new plane had been found, it would be a full passenger version, leaving from gate F3 at a time not yet defined.

We were informed that we could get a voucher for drinks and phone calls from the transfer automatic machines.

I did not bother to do so, but went to the nearest KL lounge where I selected a seat with view on the action: gate F3 (without the new plane yet), and gate G4 at the back.



At 16:08 passengers of the Hong Kong flight were called at the service desk, and we were informed that the flight would leave at 19:45 and were given a booklet with :
- a phone card for a 5 minute phone call,
- an amenity coupon with a choice of either 10 euros meals/beverages, 2000 Flying Blue miles or 15 euros reduction on duty free goods bought on-board. I chose the miles, even thought I felt the compensation was quite light: after a 2 hours delay on an AF CCS-CDG flight I had received 4000 miles, without having to do anything.
- a 50 euro discount coupon for KL, AF or NW flights to "selected destinations" worldwide.



The value of the discount coupon is in reality not 50 euros, as to redeem it you have to buy the ticket through a ticketing office, with service charges higher than if you buy on internet (with AF at least, I am less familiar with KL price structure).

For example ticketing fees on AF long haul flights are:
- eco fares: 30 euros if bought at an office, 10 on the AF website: in this case the real value of the coupon is 30 euros.
- business fares: 70 euros if bought at an office, 15 on internet: in this case the real value of the coupon is ... minus 5 euros. Not very interesting!

I was comfortably installed in the lounge, which is large, and was not crowded.


So between starting to write this TR, browsing the internet, sending some e-mails, reading and eating some snacks (not a very large choice however) the time flew quite quickly.

But still no plane in sight at gate F3.

I asked to the service desk what to do with my 2000 miles coupons, and the lady said: "just give it to me". The miles were on my account when I checked, 2 days later.

At 18:45 I checked a screen in the lounge and saw that the departure time was now planned at 19:30, 15 minutes earlier than anticipated, and was... at gate G4. So apparently we would fly on the initially programmed plane, as there had been no plane movement there during the afternoon.
I packed my things and went back to gate G4 where boarding was already going on.


Flight KL887: AMS-CDG

B 74M PH-BFF
Scheduled 15:20 -- 08:30
Real 19:56 (+4:36)-- 13:04 (+ 4:34)
Seat 12E
Load factor: 100% (Eco)

Row E of the half cabin is interesting as the wall separating the cabin from the galley is at 20 cm from the seats. So you have space to put things during the flight or stretch your legs between the front seat and the wall.
The seat itself was OK, without PTV. My only surprise was that the (white) pillow did not have a pillowcase: do they throw away these pillows frequently? Or do they wash them? I would have thought it was more economical to wash the pillowcases only!

At 19:40 the captain (apparently the same than for the initial flight) came on the PA and told us than the electrical fault had been found 40 minutes after having decided to change the plane: it was a faulty relay. But, for reasons I did not understand, it was too late to depart earlier.
Maybe the crew when to take some rest and would not have been able to fly right away? If somebody has an idea...

We finally pushed back at 19:56, started to taxi, then stopped and waited. At 20:12 the captain explained us there was a problem with the flight plan, and that we were waiting for a new clearance.
In the meantime we were given headphones, but nothing else in terms of amenity kits.

Things finally improved, and we started to taxi again at 20:16 and took-off at 20:20.

At 20:33 appetizer was served: almonds with a choice of drinks.


Then hot (disposable) towels were distributed, followed by the dinner.

The presentation of the meals gives a quite "cheap" impression, and the boxes are quite difficult to open. Without spilling food.
It was a 3 course meal, with a not very good bean and soya salad, a tasty beef with rice, and a good dessert.


However I was disappointed not to have any cheese (some years ago there was in France an advertising campaign titled "Holland, the other country for cheeses"), and that the "butter" was in fact a sort of margarine. Are Dutch cows striking ?

At 22:30 (04:30 HKG time) the dinner was finished and I went to sleep.

There were no turbulences and I would have slept quite well if the temperature of the cabin had been slightly higher: there were unpleasantly cold airflows even thought the personal vents were closed.

I guess some snacks were available during the nights as I smelled the distinctive scent of instant noodles.

At 11:25 lights were turned on, followed 15 minutes later by another disposable hot towel and the breakfast.


At 12:21 the captain announced the beginning of the descent and at 12:40 came from the chief purser a long list of the rebooked flights, as most connecting passengers had obviously missed their connections.

We landed softly at 12:56 and were at gate S35 at 13:04.

I disembarked at 13:07 and arriving in the terminal there were no less than 7 agents with boards for the connecting passengers!

I took the escalators to the shuttle platform, and the shuttle left at 13:13.


Having disembarked from the short shuttle trip, and reached the arrival level, I identified on which side my luggage would be delivered, and started to queue at the adequate immigration line at 13:18, with around 60 persons in front of me, and 6 counters staffed.


At 13:32 I was processed, and, when arriving at the carrousel at 13:35 my suitcase was already there. HKG efficiency, as usual!

I exited and, leaving the easy access to the Airport Express train on my right, I went to the taxi pick-up, as my hotel location in the New Territories requires 2 connections if you take the Airport Express and the metro.


Arrival Hall


Airport Express Access


Access to taxi stand


Taxi Stand




On the highway.



CONCLUSION
As I was not specially in a hurry for this flight the delay was not a too bad experience for me. Apparently KLM passengers are used to them (or are particularly quiet), as the delay announcement did not generate any particular demonstration of anxiety or discontent.
It is fortunate this delay did not happen on my previous flight with KL, as that time I had a meeting planned just after arriving in Hong Kong.

The fact that a technical problem does lead to a 4 hours delay at the home base of the airline confirms KL is using its fleet at the maximum (as readers of this board know) and has no spare plane available. This is a risk that has to be considered when having tight schedules.

The impossibility (even as a Platinum FB member) to pre-select a good seat on the website once the booking is made is a serious inconvenient, as it is not always possible to be on-line when the OLCI process starts. This should be addressed by KL, it works very well for AF flights on the AF website.


On some points the on-board service was better than AF (hot towel), but in general AF is slightly better: amenity kit, menu, and meals that do not give a so "fast-food” impression (due to their presentation, but they were quite edible except the salad). Holland cheeses should be added!

The on-board crew was OK but it was necessary to ask for everything in addition of the basic (water in addition of the wine for dinner, even though no water was given with the tray, second helping of coffee with the breakfast, and she was away before I could ask for sugar and milk, which should have been proposed automatically).

A point that should be improved is the possibility to have water without having to move (especially since a video shown in the plane was remembering the necessity to drink a lot in flight). In effect with the security control it is not possible to bring your own bottle on-board (ex AMS at least, I guess ex-HKG it will be possible, as the security is before the duty free area), and no water at all (not even a sealed glass) is given on the trays. AF has solved this issue by often providing a small bottle of water with the meal that you can keep for the night.

CDG worked well, but KL lounges in AMS are definitely better in terms of comfort than those of CDG, and far less crowded. On the other hand the food available is quite limited.


Now (setting aside the delay problem) if I have to compare a direct flight on an AF 777 and this KL connecting flight on a 744 (especially in the front half cabin), I'll happily select the KL flight, as I really dislike 777s (and have decided to totally ban using them when 10 abreast seating, as implemented in AF 77W, not yet 772), and as transferring in AMS is really easy.
Not having a PTV is not fundamental for me, I prefer space, especially for a night flight where my first objective is to sleep as much as possible.

There is a difference in the on-board service and catering between AF and KL but it would not have justified the 50% higher fare charged by AF for the days I wanted to travel, considering the increase in total travel time is less than 20%.


Avoid 777 with 3-4-3 config in Y ! They are real sardine cans. (AF/KL for example)
14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLHboyatDTW From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 14194 times:

Very nice TR, but I just want to point out one thing.

Quote:
Flight KL887: AMS-CDG

B 74M PH-BFF
Scheduled 15:20 -- 08:30
Real 19:56 (+4:36)-- 13:04 (+ 4:34)
Seat 12E
Load factor: 100% (Eco)

I think you meant HKG instead.  Wink


User currently offlineTGV From France, joined Dec 2004, 874 posts, RR: 20
Reply 2, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 13854 times:



Quoting LHboyatDTW (Reply 1):
I think you meant HKG instead.

The Copy/Paste wizard won again!

And I was happy after correcting maybe 50 typos and fighting to get clickable thumbnails and not large images !

Congratulations for your attentive reading!



Avoid 777 with 3-4-3 config in Y ! They are real sardine cans. (AF/KL for example)
User currently offlineSemsem From Israel, joined Jul 2005, 1779 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 13808 times:

I agree with you. I noticed that the 777 is unbelievably noisy unlike the A340. Surprised KLM no longer serve cheese. I really like it too. I flew AF 777 this summer and felt the seats were hard but legroom good.

User currently offlineAirbuseric From Netherlands, joined Jan 2005, 4207 posts, RR: 51
Reply 4, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 13628 times:

Hi. Good report actually. Such a shame to see a delay on your KL flight. You would've expected that shuffling around with a few aircraft would've solved the problem and minimized the delay. But flexibility in the KL fleet is nowadays quite far. I also think the crew took the neccesary crewrest.


"The whole world steps aside for the man who knows where he is going"
User currently offlineBA319-131 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 8430 posts, RR: 55
Reply 5, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 13628 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Thanks for posting, good report on your AF & KL experience and certain differences between the 2 carriers.

Your service opinions and views are pretty much in line with other TR's here, I don't find any reason to frequent their planes in the near future for sure!

I too agree with your comments on the 777, I too try to avoid them where possible, I dislike the noise, that said I do need to add the -300, 77W & 77L to fly flown list, so I'll have to suffer at some stage!  Smile

Look forward to more TR's soon.

Regards

Mark



111,732,3,4,5,7,8,BBJ,741,742,743,744,752,762,763,764,772,773,77W,L15,D10,30,40,AB3,AB6,A312.313,319,320,321,332,333,342
User currently offlineAFKL From Netherlands, joined Feb 2008, 219 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 13520 times:



Quoting TGV (Thread starter):
Apparently KLM passengers are used to them (or are particularly quiet), as the delay announcement did not generate any particular demonstration of anxiety or discontent.

I think its more of a cultural thing. From my personal experiences (I have lived in France for seven years) the Dutch are more down to Earth when it comes to these situations, when compared to the French (I say French as you have stated you fly AF on a regular basis). I guess we merely accept it, however annoying it may be, knowing that complaining will not get you in the air any sooner. The French I guess, feel more the need to express their annoyances and discontent towards whoever may be responsible, even though they cannot get you at your destination sooner. (Obviously a general view).


Great TR though, I really enjoy reading trip reports from KLM.  Wink


ALLARD.



ALLARD. First flight: KLM DC-10, LLW - AMS.
User currently offlineFlpuck6 From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 2122 posts, RR: 30
Reply 7, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 13303 times:

Bonjour TGV,

Thank you for your report. It is quite enlightening to witness the operations of KLM with regards to Air France, especially during irregularity.

I find the proposition of the choice of "compensation" to be appropriate, even though 2000 miles less than AF without having to do anything.

It seems that information was still passed on to the passengers, unlike some airlines in the United States.

Regarding the 50euro reduction on future travel ... indeed you are obligated to go to a ticketing office and consequently when you use such a voucher service charges should not be applied, since, effectively, you are obligated to go to a ticketing office. This is the case with any voucher amount.

Merci encore.

Quoting TGV (Thread starter):
The value of the discount coupon is in reality not 50 euros, as to redeem it you have to buy the ticket through a ticketing office, with service charges higher than if you buy on internet (with AF at least, I am less familiar with KL price structure).

For example ticketing fees on AF long haul flights are:
- eco fares: 30 euros if bought at an office, 10 on the AF website: in this case the real value of the coupon is 30 euros.
- business fares: 70 euros if bought at an office, 15 on internet: in this case the real value of the coupon is ... minus 5 euros. Not very interesting!




Bonjour Chef!
User currently offlineTGV From France, joined Dec 2004, 874 posts, RR: 20
Reply 8, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 13263 times:



Quoting Flpuck6 (Reply 7):
I find the proposition of the choice of "compensation" to be appropriate, even though 2000 miles less than AF without having to do anything.

I don't complain, if I understood well the 4000 miles with AF were linked to my Plat status, passengers with lower status received lower compensations.

Quoting Flpuck6 (Reply 7):
Regarding the 50euro reduction on future travel ... indeed you are obligated to go to a ticketing office and consequently when you use such a voucher service charges should not be applied, since, effectively, you are obligated to go to a ticketing office. This is the case with any voucher amount.

Merci de l'info !

I will try to have the fee reduced when going to the ticketing office. Since I already bought my New Year vacation ticket (CDG-CCS-CDG one of my last opportunities of flying AF 744 Upper deck, before they are replaced by 77W  hissyfit  ) I will have to wait for another flight.



Avoid 777 with 3-4-3 config in Y ! They are real sardine cans. (AF/KL for example)
User currently offlineJouy31 From France, joined May 2003, 447 posts, RR: 10
Reply 9, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 12015 times:



Quoting TGV (Thread starter):
Apparently newspapers are not given in the jetways anymore, but in the main hall itself. This is better because passengers can read them while waiting to board, and, by not stopping at the jetways entrance to pick-up newspapers, they will not slow down the boarding process.

Only in 2F1.

Very nice and detailed trip report. Thanks !


User currently offlineB747forever From Sweden, joined May 2007, 17004 posts, RR: 10
Reply 10, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 11728 times:

Just a question, do you dislike the 777 as an aircraft, or just its seat interior with some carriers???


Work Hard, Fly Right
User currently offlineTGV From France, joined Dec 2004, 874 posts, RR: 20
Reply 11, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 11417 times:

Cancelled, double post.

[Edited 2008-10-14 06:25:56]


Avoid 777 with 3-4-3 config in Y ! They are real sardine cans. (AF/KL for example)
User currently offlineTGV From France, joined Dec 2004, 874 posts, RR: 20
Reply 12, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 11408 times:



Quoting B747forever (Reply 10):
Just a question, do you dislike the 777 as an aircraft, or just its seat interior with some carriers???

As an aircraft! Now I know I have to  duck , especially on airliners.net where this plane seems really appreciated due to its technical and economical characteristics! But I am not a plane engineer, nor an airline, so my criteria are different!

First I find it ugly (only a matter of opinion, and when you are inside you don't see it!).

Second it is very noisy, especially in the back. This is logical with 2 large engines near the cabin, but other twins do not give this impression, with the same configuration (OK they have smaller engines!).

Third it has a cabin width designed for a 3-3-3 layout (as a normal situation, I don't' even speak of the dreadful 3-4-3 config used by AF on 77W!) so I always end with double excuse seat, as I like window seats to enjoy the view outside (even if, with the size of the 777 wing, window seats are often without downward view!). Nobody will ever convince me a 3-3-3 layout is superior to a 2-4-2 layout.

Fourth, I maybe conservative, but the idea of very long flights, especially over water, with only 2 engines does not appeal me a lot (I know you have statistically more chance of problems with 4 engines than with 2, but I prefer having 3 remaining than 1...).

And fifth (and for me the most important point), I generally get a strong headache on my 777 flights of more than 6 hours, something that does not happen to me with other airliners.

Now my sample for these long flights is limited to AF777 (as I always try to avoid 777, I have only logged 21 flights with 777, compared to 71 with 340/330 and 145 for the 747).
Is this headache problem limited to AF777 or inherent to the plane?
I tend to think it is the second answer, as I have read I was not the only one to suffer discomfort, especially at the beginning.

See:
http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/aviation/hci/ahwg/27july2001minutes

With this sentence in point 2.1:
"BA's input to the conference reported a range of modifications to the Boeing 777 to remedy various health-related problems."

At the time problems with the ventilation/pressurization where mentioned.

In the end I always opt for 340/330/767 first, 747 second, and reluctantly select the 777 if I really don't have any other option!



Avoid 777 with 3-4-3 config in Y ! They are real sardine cans. (AF/KL for example)
User currently offlineB747forever From Sweden, joined May 2007, 17004 posts, RR: 10
Reply 13, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 11073 times:



Quoting TGV (Reply 12):

Wow, seems you really dont like the 777. Have never been on one, but would love to be one day soon.

Bad that you "hate" such a great a/c



Work Hard, Fly Right
User currently offlineKLMCedric From Belgium, joined Dec 2003, 810 posts, RR: 22
Reply 14, posted (5 years 6 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 10710 times:



Quoting AFKL (Reply 6):
I think its more of a cultural thing. From my personal experiences (I have lived in France for seven years) the Dutch are more down to Earth when it comes to these situations, when compared to the French (I say French as you have stated you fly AF on a regular basis). I guess we merely accept it, however annoying it may be, knowing that complaining will not get you in the air any sooner. The French I guess, feel more the need to express their annoyances and discontent towards whoever may be responsible, even though they cannot get you at your destination sooner. (Obviously a general view).

That theory might be relevant, if it weren't from the fact that on an average longhaul KLM
flight a mere 10 to 15% of pax are in fact dutch!


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic CDG-AMS-HKG With AF/KL In Y (Photos – Delay)
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Trip reports only! Other topics here
  • If criticizing an airline, express yourself in a dignified manner.
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
AF/KLM - AMS-LYS-CDG-AMS In Y (too Many Pics) posted Wed Aug 13 2008 07:00:47 by Henkybaby
AMS-HKG-AMS With CX In Economy (pics) posted Fri Mar 30 2007 11:43:54 by Kappel
CCS-CDG-CCS With AF In Y posted Fri Sep 29 2006 01:25:11 by TGV
VS 744 In Y & AF 343 In J - Trip To CDG W/ Pix posted Mon Mar 24 2008 17:18:21 by VikingA346
LIS/CDG/FIH/CDG/LIS With AF posted Sat Jul 7 2007 21:27:19 by CV990
MCI-ATL-AMS-OTP With DL And KL (60+pics And Vids) posted Thu Jun 14 2007 14:10:05 by Dc9northwest
SVG-AMS-YVR On KL In C June 19th 06 posted Thu Dec 7 2006 04:28:38 by Fsimmer
Get Myself Back To The Ground: EZE-CDG With AF posted Mon Oct 9 2006 21:21:32 by KhunRyeroam
JFK-AMS-IST-DLM On KL/TK With 3 Cockpit Visits posted Wed Sep 13 2006 01:00:17 by TK787
SFO-NRT-SIN-HKG-SFO UA In C (Photos, Menus, Maps) posted Sun Apr 23 2006 06:44:11 by 3201

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format