Sponsor Message:
Aviation Trip Reports Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
MUC-LHR-ORD-LAX On BA And AA  
User currently offlineUdo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 6401 times:

I just arrived at LAX and can now post my trip report.


MUC-LHR, Sept.5th
BA 947, 07:35-08:50
A320-232, G-EUUF (msn 1814)

Security checks for UK flights seem to be almost as strict as on US flights and I had to wait more than 20 minutes before getting into the gate area. Traffic was low this morning, so I boarded early. I was surprised about the aircraft, A320-232 G-EUUF since it is one of BA’s newest planes, only delivered on July 29th. I can tell everything smelled new inside the cabin, especially the leather seats. After being delayed 30 minutes we took off from the northern runway. Take off was nice and the IAE engines appear to be more powerful and quieter than CFMs. Seat pitch was ok but BA doesn’t have the little moving TV screens (such as Iberia). Breakfast was served in little bags, they had quite good ham sandwiches (Parma style) and fresh fruit. However, they offered more in former times.
We arrived at LHR on time and I immediately went to the spectators gallery on T2. I got some nice regs such as BWIA A340 and Qatar A330. Two hours later I made my way towards T3.


LHR-ORD, Sept.5th
AA067, 12:30-15:00
B777-223ER, N776AN (msn 215, built in 99)

Before getting into my departure gate I was checked carefully, everything in my bag and my shoes were searched for explosives or other dangerous items. The aircraft was one of the planes in Pacific configuration with the larger C-class. Economy seats were in dark blue tone with even darker headrests which looked quite boring. Unfortunately I was seated in row 42 (the last window row) and the fuselage is tighter there which means I couldn’t feel much about MRTC. I additionally had the box for IFE under the seat, so space was not good. But all the other rows seemed to offer a nice pitch.
The plane was full and we left the gate almost on time. Taxi was fast and soon the two RR Trents kicked our great machine into the sky and gave us a fast climb. As usual, the B777 take off was very loud, and regular cabin noise in flight was also quite loud (compared to the extremely quiet A340). However, I would always prefer the B777, more power is more entertaining…
The PTV system was started and they offered a good movie selection, however most of the time I watched the flight map. Audio programming was very disappointing, no really international radio hits, only American, Latin American and Asian music channels.
FAs were not too friendly but still ok. Salmon or Chicken were served for lunch, the fish was very tasty. Best of all was a chocolate cream cake. Drinks were served frequently during the first half of the flight but not so often towards the end. Before landing they served a pizza snack which was not the best example for airline food.
During the flight the captain made his round through Economy and he seemed to be a very friendly person. So far, I have only seen captains on Cathay walking around in the cabin and asking the pax if anything was ok. Nice move.
After turning near O’Hare a bit we landed exactly on time (15:00) and I was deeply impressed the very smooth touchdown, I almost couldn’t feel touching the ground. Well done, captain!
I came through immigration and customs fast (most international flights had arrived earlier) and took the train to AA’s Terminal 3. I found a nice place to spot three runways (two of them close) and was extremely busy two hours with writing down regs. Great traffic at ORD, such as bmi A332, KLM B743, two SAS B763 (new cls), Kalitta B742F, AF A340, Spirit new cls, most American carriers and so many commuter planes.


ORD-LAX, Sept.5th
AA453, 18.11-20.41
B737-823, N913AN (msn 293, built in 99)

I entered a B737NG for the first time and was positively surprised about the spacious cabin. Walls and bins seemed to have that B777 style and combined with AA’s MRTC program I had much space and leg room.
The plane was well booked and we left the gate almost on time, soon followed by take off. Take off was powerful (compared to B737 classics) but very very loud, it roared and the whole plane seemed to vibrate. Though the question of space is not so much an issue when comparing B737NGs and A320s, the question of noise is. The B738 was also loud in flight and therefore I see a clear victory for the quiet A320 here. However, the NG was comfortable to fly.
Food wasn’t served but every coach passengers could take a small snack bag at the entry. It contained a tasty sandwich, carrots, chips and cookies, not bad. Drinks were only served two times in 4 hours, I felt a bit dry…I also didn’t pay one Dollar for the headset since music was the same as on the B777.
We reached California early and I could enjoy a great view of the millions of lights at night. Touchdown was hard and reverse thrust stopped us quite fast. I must admit, the B737NG is better than I expected, though my preference for the A320 remains firm.

Now I’m looking forward to my JetBlue flights LGB-OAK-LGB next Tuesday, I will also post a report as soon as possible.


Regards
Udo


15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAerobalance From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 4683 posts, RR: 47
Reply 1, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 6205 times:

Right-on Udo!!

Welcome to my neck of the woods, Southern California! Great trip report. Enjoy your stay and pleasant travels.

T



"Sing a song, play guitar, make it snappy..."
User currently offlineCmk10 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 513 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 6042 times:

I personally enjoy AA's Channel 4 (80's Music), but nice report. DId you have to re-enter security once at Terminal 3? I want to take that train but I dotn want to leave security.
DC-10's Forever



"Traveling light is the only way to fly" - Eric Clapton
User currently offlineBlink182 From Azerbaijan, joined Oct 1999, 5482 posts, RR: 15
Reply 3, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 5995 times:

Nice report, I find it odd that the drink service was scarce. Everytime I have flown AA after 9/11, the FA's were constantly in the cabin doing drink services.

blink



Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
User currently offlineCapt.Picard From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 5924 times:

Thanks for sharing that with us, Udo! Great to read such interesting stuff.

I also flew the AA 738 last year (ORD-SEA); I found the cabin very nice, and the service good (which surprised me, given everyone seems to say American carriers' weak point are their service).

I also flew JB SEA-JFK last year; I thought they were great too-especially the joy of flying the A320!

Well, I hope you enjoy your travels in America, keep us informed!


User currently offlineSabena332 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 5876 times:

Hi Udo!

Thanks for posting the trip report, I enjoyed reading very much. I am looking forward to your next Jet Blue report.

Patrick


User currently offlineUdo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 5883 times:

Thanks for your comments.
Charles, did you mean Terminal 3 at ORD? Yes, I had to re-enter security, but I was surprised that it wasn't strict at all. They scanned my bag and I just went through the metal detector. Nothing else, no check for explosives, no careful bag check, no body check. Regarding the fact that any person going on a domestic flight doesn't have to pass stricter security I'm wondering...I mean the terrorists entered domestic flights, not transatlantic flights.

Is there another way apart from the train? Hard to imagine if you see the distance.


Regards
Udo


User currently offlineBlink182 From Azerbaijan, joined Oct 1999, 5482 posts, RR: 15
Reply 7, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 5846 times:

Udo- Having gone from T5 to T3 at ORD myself (LHR-ORD-DFW last summer), unless you want to get a car and drive over there, I think there is no other way. The tram is pretty slow I admit, but it has some good views, so I won't complain.

blink



Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
User currently offlineThe777Man From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 6639 posts, RR: 55
Reply 8, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 5769 times:

Hi Udo! Great report! Just a comment on the musical programming; I'm surprised that AA doesn't have more diversified options. UA has a channel called European Beat with European music and also another channel called Rhythms of the World which normally also has music from Europe along with music from many other countries in Africa and South America. UA also doesn't charge for headsets within the US. Looking forward to your tripreport from JetBlue. The777Man


Need a Boeing 777 Firing Order....Further to fly....CI, MU, LX and LH 777s
User currently offlineUSAFHummer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 10685 posts, RR: 52
Reply 9, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 5760 times:

I flew AA recently on PHL-DFW-PHL segments, which were 3 hrs. 30 minutes and we only got two drink services as well plus the Bistro bags...

Greg



Chief A.net college football stadium self-pic guru
User currently offlineAirblue From San Marino, joined May 2001, 1825 posts, RR: 11
Reply 10, posted (12 years 2 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 5744 times:

I enjoyed reading very much, great report Smile


User currently offlineContinental From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5520 posts, RR: 18
Reply 11, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 5463 times:

I know this post hasn't been replied to in a long time, but it was the only one I could find with AA ORD-LAX in coach! I'm flying it in a few weeks! Nice report!

co


User currently offlineUdo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 5318 times:

Hey John,

I got really surprised after finding my old post on top today! What aircraft type are you going to take? Enjoy your trip!


Regards
Udo


User currently offlineSouthwestMDW From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 303 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 5204 times:

Good Report- I will be going to LAX soon- might take AA.

User currently offlineChris78cpr From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 2822 posts, RR: 50
Reply 14, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 5130 times:

Good report, it's great to read about someone's expeiriance with LHR to ORD on AA! I'm going to be doing this route in a few weeks and it seems like it should be good! Still annoyed my internal flight was changed from a 757 to an MD80 though!!!

Chris



5D2/7D/1D2(soon to be a 1Dx) 17-40L/24-105L/70-200F2.8L/100-400L/24F1.4LII/50F1.2L/85F1.2LII
User currently offlineContinental From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5520 posts, RR: 18
Reply 15, posted (10 years 9 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 5111 times:

Udo: I'll be taking the F-100, 737-800, 777-200, and the MD-80. I've been on their F-100 and MD-80 already, and I know that the legroom is generous, especially on the F-100. I'm looking forward to the two 3 hour flights!

co


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic MUC-LHR-ORD-LAX On BA And AA
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Trip reports only! Other topics here
  • If criticizing an airline, express yourself in a dignified manner.
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
PVG-NRT-ORD-PHL On ANA And AA. Very Detailed! posted Fri Jul 9 2004 18:32:22 by Tony Lu
BAH-LHR-NCL-LHR-DXB-BAH On BA And GF + Bomb Alert posted Mon Aug 27 2001 12:36:58 by Eg777er
MAN-LHR-LAX-HNL-SFO-LHR-MAN On BA And UA posted Sat Oct 5 2002 11:59:15 by LPL
TLS-LHR-LAX And Back On BE And AA (PART 1) posted Tue Sep 24 2002 21:27:56 by KLAX
WLG-AKL-LAX-ORD-DTW On NZ And UA. Part 1 posted Sun Aug 27 2006 13:22:32 by 777ER
AKL-LAX-ORD-CLT On Qantas And United (re-edited) posted Sun Nov 13 2005 18:35:19 by Adam T.
CMI-ORD-LAX On MQ Y / AA F posted Sun Jun 6 2004 05:50:46 by Alexchao
Vienna - London/LHR - San Francisco ~ On OS And BA posted Fri Aug 9 2002 22:32:18 by Spotterboy
LAX-ANC-ORD-LAX On AS (F)/AA (Y) posted Sat Nov 18 2000 01:48:20 by Charles802
LAX-LHR-LHR-LGW-TLV-LCA-LHR-LAX On BA posted Wed Oct 11 2000 04:29:06 by Brtishairways

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format