Sponsor Message:
Aviation Trip Reports Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
PVD-MCO-PVD On Southwest  
User currently offlineGD727 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 925 posts, RR: 10
Posted (11 years 5 months 18 hours ago) and read 2969 times:

I took this trip back during April Vacation. My family and I traveled down to Orlando for nine days in both Disney and Universal.

April 21st, 2003
Southwest Flight: 728
PVD-MCO
Boeing 737-300 N324SW


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Art Brett



My family and I arrived at PVD at 6:30Am and parked in the C garage. Upon proceeding into the terminal, I was stunned. I had never seen PVD so crowded in my entire life! We made our way to the queue to check in with WN and, surprisingly waited only about 15 minutes to check our three bags. The security line was the longest I have ever seen, for those who are farmilair with PVD, the line snaked around the check in area upstairs and continued down the stairs into more snaking in the baggage claim area. There was even a guy holding a huge sign that said "Line Starts Here", what a crappy job! The line did move pretty fast though, it took about 40 minutes to get through, at the checkpoint, I was pulled aside and wanded, but the TSA guys were actually quite friendly. Finally through check in, we proceeded to gate 15 where there was no plane, yet. Even though we checked in nearly an hour and a half before the 7:50Am flight, we still only got boarding group B. After a while, N324SW pulled up to the gate, bringing the early morning arrival from BWI.

We boarded and made our way to the rear of the plane, I can't remember the exact row, but I think it was 16 or 17, I do remember it was the port side though. All around us was a group of high school kids traveling to MCO on a field trip. I took a look around the cabin, N324SW is one of WN's older -300's (a 1987, I believe) and the interior was a bit worn, but reasonably comfortable. We pushed back on time and taxied out to the main runway. With no wait, we rocketed out of PVD, heading for the warm south. The seatbelt signs were kept on as beverage service commenced. We were served a beverage (I had cran-apple), a bag of peanuts, and a package of Chips Ahoy cookies, not bad for WN! The FAs were also very friendly. The captain kept us up to date on the weather in MCO and our routing throughout the flight. The sign went off for about an hour, but came back on and off twice again, due to light chop. Regardless, people still got up to use the lavatories (surprise, surprise  Wow!). Before long, the engine power was pulled back and we began our decent over the Atlantic Coast. The high school kids were actually pretty quiet during the flight, except during decent when the captain was on the PA and accidentally called an FA Jim when his name was Tim or something, then he went on to say "Sorry Tim, I was just protecting you from that group of 17 year olds in the back." Then he said "It's all good", it was kind of funny. We descended over Daytona Beach, then SFB and straight onto runway 17, where we made a normal touchdown. We deplaned into the new airiest (4, I think) and quickly collected our bags. As we were waiting for my dad to get the rental car at the Budget desk, the fire alarm went off. It was strange though, because no one (including the employees) reacted to it.


April 29th, 2003
Southwest Flight: 1253
MCO-PVD
Boeing 737-300 N397SW


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Timothy O'Bryan



After 9 fun-filled days, it was time to go home (I always hate going home from Orlando). We returned the car and checked in quickly. The crowds weren't that bad, we waited 20 minutes to get through security. We made our way to the new airside and waited near the Jetblue gate. After a long wait, we boarded N397SW, which was a noticeably newer -300 (a 1995). Even though we checked in two hours early, when we boarded, the plane was nearly full. We got the last fully open row of three seats, which was row 20 or something (the last seats in the back). We pushed back and headed for runway 35, where we took off immediately. The takeoff was strange though, the pilot seemed to be steering the plane in a zig-zag pattern down the runway, I'm not sure why that was. The seatbelt sign turned off quickly and beverage service commenced. This time we got a drink, a bag of peanuts, and a package of Wheat Thins. The cup we got the drink in was small and they did not give us the whole can, but the FA did come back and ask if anyone wanted refills. As on the flight down to MCO, the FAs were very friendly. The flight was pretty uneventful, but we did get to see the sunset, which was nice. We touched down in the dark at PVD with full reverse thrust and taxied to gate 19, ending a great trip.

Concluding, Southwest was good to us on this trip, except for the fact that I still can't stand their open seating (we arrived 2 hours early and still had a hard time getting good seats). I would definitely fly them again though. The trip itself was excellent, except for a huge problem we had with the hotel we reserved. So that's my report, hope you liked it.

-GD727



Mmmm forbidden donut.
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAA737-823 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 5947 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (11 years 5 months 16 hours ago) and read 2937 times:

Good report.

Have you flown their -700s? I like the -700. I have flown Conti's and Southwest's. I generally, though, prefer an A320 to a -300. How do they compare, the -300s and -700s, over at WN? Does the -300 really show it's age?

R


User currently offlineNo1racer From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 115 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (11 years 5 months 14 hours ago) and read 2909 times:

Hey,

AA737-823, I have flown the -700's and they are wonderful, and they feel very new. I have flown on their 5th oldest 737-700, and the seats on them however were as worn as those on an old -300, but comfortable. In regard to your second question, it compares. The last 6 times I have flown southwest, I have had all new interiors, and 4 with new paint schemes. They are as comfortable as the -700's, but they were not upgraded to -700's interior, so there is the little light instead of the bathroom symbol, and the -200 type roofs are still in place. However all the walls are sparkling white, so they are nice. The answer to your third question would be yes, but consider -300's were coming in until 1998 or 9 so there are big differences. The oldest -300's though have wheegear that jerk on bumps, engine variations, showing engine age, but this is engine life, not plane life, and paint is chipped as well as cabin walls, but none of it is worse than any other major. Thanks

Sincerely,
no1racer


User currently offlineUN_B732 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 4289 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (11 years 5 months 6 hours ago) and read 2856 times:

I had the same thing happen when I flew on U N I T E D from Orlando-Washington-Burlington, that voice as the fire alarm went off, but nobody reacted. This was in like 1999.....
An A319 and a CRJ took me on that voyage up to Burlington.
-UN



What now?
User currently offlineAA737-823 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 5947 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (11 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2827 times:

I recently flew their -700s, and was waay impressed. I made a trip report- go read it. It compared to Continental's.

I haven't been on one of their -300s since 1996. I just wondered how they were holding up.

Seats worn? I don't really like that. Not that it's dangerous or anything, but... come on.

But then, they did say that the switch to all leather was partially due to increased seat life.

R


User currently offlineCatholic2006 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 357 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (11 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2797 times:

Hey! I am really siked that you had a great flight with Southwest Airlines. I wish I could have had the service you had because my travels with them were ALL terrible. That fact that you stated that your flight attendants were really friendly gives me some good sense of hope for if I have to fly them in the future.

Be glad that you had an uneventful flight. I like it whenever the flights are just cruising throught the air without bumps or anything because it just lets you gaze out into the wonders of the sky. It's so beautiful when the sun is rebounding off of the clouds making them have a crystalline effect. Turbulence just distracts me from that.

I haven't gone to Disney World for a while, but I figure I'm far too old now (15), but I would not mind spending a few days at Islands of Adventure. Glad you had a fun trip, and as I say, "Flying to your vacation destination makes it 150% better!" God Bless!!!

-Chris



Ne vous inquietez pas. Je ne vous hais pas . . . . encore, mais faites attention !
User currently offlineGD727 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 925 posts, RR: 10
Reply 6, posted (11 years 4 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 2794 times:

Glad you all liked the report, here are my responses.

AA737-823: I unfortunately have not flown on the -700 yet, I was hoping to fly on one this trip, but with WN you don't know exactly what kind of 737 it is until it pulls into the gate. I read your report though, and from your description, the -700 sounds nice. About the -300's condition, I didn't see anything serious, there wasn't any peeling paint or anything, but the seats were fairly worn and there were some broken tray tables. The seats were still moderately comfortable though (no worse then the majors).

UN_B732: It happened when you were there too? Perhaps they were testing the alarm?

Catholic2006: I'm sorry you didn't have any good experiences on WN. Hopefully if you try them again, your experience will be better. Also, don't ever worry about being to old for Disney, it is not nearly as kiddish as it used to be. I would also recommend Islands Of Adventure though, as it is also an excellent theme park.

-GD727






Mmmm forbidden donut.
User currently offlineN766UA From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 8377 posts, RR: 23
Reply 7, posted (11 years 4 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 2789 times:

I'm 17 and disney is still friggen awesome.


This Website Censors Me
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic PVD-MCO-PVD On Southwest
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Trip reports only! Other topics here
  • If criticizing an airline, express yourself in a dignified manner.
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
PVD-MCO-PVD On Southwest posted Thu Jul 31 2003 02:57:07 by GD727
CLE-BNA-MCO-(BNA)-CLE On Southwest posted Thu Jan 3 2002 04:16:14 by Redngold
STL-MCO-FLL/FLL-TPA-CMH-MDW On Southwest posted Thu Nov 16 2000 17:52:07 by G-SPOT
CLE-MCO-CLE On CO, 35 Pics! posted Sat Aug 5 2006 05:26:40 by Monorail
Southwest On Southwest CLE-PHX-MDW-CLE posted Mon Jul 17 2006 22:11:34 by Redngold
Comment On Southwest Service posted Thu Apr 27 2006 18:16:59 by KLMA330
MCO-IAD On Ted (1st Trip Report) posted Fri Sep 23 2005 03:38:29 by Potomac
Nashville-PHX On Southwest 26 Pics posted Tue Jul 5 2005 23:51:39 by Airbus3801
CLE-BWI-CLE On Southwest For Easter posted Tue Mar 29 2005 05:18:13 by Redngold
PHL-MDW On Southwest, Pics! posted Sat Dec 4 2004 19:57:26 by SouthwestMDW

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format