Exitrowaisle From United States of America, joined May 2000, 262 posts, RR: 0 Posted (12 years 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1429 times:
Just took a quick trip from my home in Tucson to visit family in Seattle. Itinerary:
May 2 - AS Flight 739 TUS-SEA
May 5 - AS Flight 738 TUS-SJC-SEA
Some observations on the trip and Alaska Airlines in general...
- Web check-in is great...if you don't have baggage to check, you don't need to come in contact with ANY airport personnel until you actually board the flight.
- Alaska Airlines airport staff at both TUS and SEA are very efficient and friendly. Maybe their workload is reduced by the large number of electronic check-in machines Alaska uses.
- B737-400 (used for all legs) - pretty comfortable the way AS configures it...they have a pleasant blue, grey and gold interior and above-average coach legroom. However, they don't have any entertainment, which is too bad, because TUS-SEA is over 3 hrs long. There are blank metal plates on the armrests where the stereos would be...maybe they used to have them? I know people like to rag on Alaska for maintenance, but all of the planes I flew on at least LOOKED like they were in good shape.
- Service on AS is very good. Even on our 1hr 30 min flight between San Jose and Tucson, we were served a sandwich and cookies, with 2 drink services (whole can too!) The crews were very professional and friendly. On the meal tray, there is a little card with an Old Testament verse...a neat idea!! Flights were not full, so I had a whole row coming back from SEA with all the benefits of both window AND aisle.
- San Jose was an interesting stopover--we taxiied right by a modern (pink!) terminal full of AA and Southwest planes and pulled up to a Greyhound-looking thing complete with exterior airstairs! Guess all of the "nobody" airlines are still using the old terminal. Didn't get off the plane so I can't comment on the interior. Last time I was inside San Jose airport was in 1992.
- Weather was gorgeous both ways. Got a spectacular view of Mt Rainier on the way up, and Mt Shasta, Golden Gate Bridge, and San Francisco on the way home. A little turbulence around Tuscon because of the heat, but nothing terrible.
In conclusion, another good trip on Alaska. Next week, I will be venturing down to Paraguay and back via AA. THAT should be quite a report.
EIPremier From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1533 posts, RR: 2 Reply 1, posted (12 years 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1305 times:
Thanks for the report!
Alaska's first 737-400s did arrive with headphone jacks. However, they were never utilized. A couple years ago, AS sold some number of their 734s and subsequently leased them back. This may be when the metal plates showed up. I would except the plates to disappear as Alaska replaces the seats on those aircraft.
SEA-TUS is certainly not the only flight where AS could used some IFE. AS has plenty of flights between SEA-ANC, and also a good number between heading down to Mexico.
Alaska had plans to begin installation of satellite TV (à la Jet Blue) on their aircraft as early as March 2000. However, the maintenance investigation ensuing flight 261 and an overall decline in schedule reliability resulted in new priorities.
By now, Alaska has now implemented the majority of their FAA action plan. There are no open labor negotiations, and schedule completion is at its best level in four years. So, it would make sense that Alaska might start to pay attention to an issue like IFE.
An AS official mentioned that a test-run of the satellite TV system on one of their 734s has been scheduled for this month. This could lead the way for installation on the majority of their aircraft.
Alaska has also been offering personal DVD players in First Class on some of their longer flights (such as ANC-ORD).
DesertJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7673 posts, RR: 18 Reply 3, posted (12 years 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1282 times:
Nice to see a fellow Tucsonan in the forum.
It is good to hear Alaska is providing service from Tucson again... the Pacific northwest is a market not well served from Tucson, unless you enjoy stoping in LAX,PHX, or SLC... or driving up to Phoenix. Hopefully we will see more service come back to Tucson in the next few years.
Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
Chrisair From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1770 posts, RR: 4 Reply 5, posted (12 years 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1247 times:
Rumor has it that AS will install some CNN Inflight or similar on ONE 737-400 for testing. This came up last year, but I'm not sure if it actually did get done. It's a fairly expensive modification. They have some real long flights ANC-ORD is their longest, however SEA-DCA would be about as long. I wouldn't hesitate flying them on those long routes, however they need to get some sort of IFE. Not just for FC, but for the folks in back.
EIPremier From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1533 posts, RR: 2 Reply 6, posted (12 years 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1242 times:
I'm not sure if it actually did get done.
No, it didn't happen. To reiterate what I previously said, this test was scheduled for March 2000 on ship 791. However, the trial run has been postponed several times since then, and the last "estimate" I heard was May 2001. But, trust me, it hasn't happened yet. When it does happen, the marketing gurus at Alaska will be trumpeting this feature to Kotzebue and back.
Installing the DirecTV system is VERY expensive, and Alaska does not have money to spare right now. However, DirecTV may pick up some of the installation costs, and if Alaska charges for the headsets in coach, it could prove to be quite a lucrative move to install the TVs systemwide. JetBlue has been very pleased with the reliability of the system, and they have seen fit to make the TVs free of charge for all passengers.
I can't help thinking that by the time Alaska finally gets around to installing a system like this, the technology will be totally obsolete.
Paulc From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 1490 posts, RR: 0 Reply 7, posted (12 years 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 1236 times:
I flew Alaska Airlines a few years ago and was a bit diasppointed. Routing was SFO-SEA-ANC-Fairbanks
SFO-SEA was good with the usual drinks and snack - left SFO 5pm arr SEA 6.30pm
SEA-ANC not good - only service was a drink and packet of peanuts - this on a sector of 3+ hours and around dinnertime i was expecting a meal of some sort and by the time i arrived in Fairbanks it was too late to get anything.
I did fill in a passenger comment card but did not get any reply - do they now provide a meal service on this sector ?
Paulc From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 1490 posts, RR: 0 Reply 9, posted (12 years 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1223 times:
EIPremier - well we did not - 9 sept 1997 was the day in question - only had a drink with peanuts - nothing else. We did notice however that lots of people joining the plane in Seattle had 'fast food' as carry on - they obviously knew something we did not >g
EIPremier From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1533 posts, RR: 2 Reply 10, posted (12 years 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1211 times:
I think you actually raise a good point, Paul. Many people accuse Alaska of "cutting back" their meal service in recent years. Yet in actuality, the opposite has been true. Alaska's catering standards are generally quite good these days (except for flights to Mexico). However, back around '95-'97, that wasn't necessarily the case.
I flew SFO-SEA-ANC-SFO all in First Class in August of '97. On a 3PM SFO-SEA flight, we received nothing but snack mix and beverages. On a 6PM SEA-ANC flight, we received a three-course dinner. But on the ANC-SFO "lunch" flight, we received a choice of a small sandwich or salad followed by a hot fudge sundae (a decidely WEIRD menu!)
Let's just say that I was glad we were travelling on award tickets!!