Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Big Jetblue Announcement In October  
User currently offlineWerdywerd From United States, joined Aug 2005, 314 posts, RR: 1
Posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 21199 times:

From what I am hearing internally, Dave Barger has stated to a few departments that Jetblue will be announcing something rather significant in the month of October. All types of rumors are going around between crewmembers internally. Anything from E-190's going to the West coast to a merger. All guesses among us at this point.

Any of you guys want to take a guess?

181 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineBurkhard From Germany, joined Nov 2006, 889 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 21150 times:

He bought Delta for 1$ ?

User currently offlineStitch From United States, joined Jul 2005, 12411 posts, RR: 52
Reply 2, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 21076 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Burkhard (Reply 1):
He bought Delta for 1$ ?

Or someone bought B6 for $2. I recall a recent rumor here about someone considering a purchase/merger of/with B6.

User currently offlineChrisNH From United States, joined Jun 1999, 2770 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 21052 times:

Mergers, in my view, aren't the kind of thing you telegraph like that a month ahead of time. So much can derail a merger, where it would be foolish to say the announcement is 'coming in October.' I'd side with something more 'operational' in nature.

Chris in NH

User currently offlineRcardinale From United States, joined Nov 2005, 174 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 20980 times:

they will take all gates at BOS and make it a large hub!! I can only wish

User currently offlineERJ170 From United States, joined Apr 2004, 5389 posts, RR: 13
Reply 5, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 20916 times:

Hmm.. a new hub at ONT with 320 and 190(*) based...

New Routes from ONT to BOS, IAD, FLL, MCO, SLC*, OAK*, SFO, SEA*, SAN*, DEN*, ALB, RDU, CLT, and RIC

Movement of LGB hub to ONT

Introduction of B-Lue online service using the current IFE (a la Virgin America)

New stations YYZ, YUL, and YYC with 3/1/1 daily flights using E190 from JFK (YYZ 1x daily to BOS)

New E90 service BOS/FLL-MSY/BNA.

Is that big enough?


RDU ~ 4 months to Terminal 2 Phase 1 opening
User currently offlineAA388 From Puerto Rico, joined Sep 2007, 250 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 20853 times:

Why would it be a big deal if the E-190 went to the west coast?

-max


flown on A319, A320, A330-200, A340-300, 737-3,5,7,8, 747-400, 757-2,3, 767-300, 777-200
User currently offlinePropilotJW From United States, joined Mar 2000, 563 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 20734 times:

Quoting ERJ170 (Reply 5):
Hmm.. a new hub at ONT with 320 and 190(*) based...

New Routes from ONT to BOS, IAD, FLL, MCO, SLC*, OAK*, SFO, SEA*, SAN*, DEN*, ALB, RDU, CLT, and RIC

Movement of LGB hub to ONT

Introduction of B-Lue online service using the current IFE (a la Virgin America)

New stations YYZ, YUL, and YYC with 3/1/1 daily flights using E190 from JFK (YYZ 1x daily to BOS)

New E90 service BOS/FLL-MSY/BNA.

Is that big enough?

I thik your western predictions are off a bit. Why would you move all of the flying out of LGB after so much has been invested there?

User currently offlineERJ170 From United States, joined Apr 2004, 5389 posts, RR: 13
Reply 8, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 20721 times:

Quoting PropilotJW (Reply 7):
Why would you move all of the flying out of LGB after so much has been invested there?

I don't mean move the flights.. I mean just move the hub status to ONT.. LGB is at capacity for B6 and there aren't any more flights they can add without some of the other airline(s) departing... ONT, on the other hand, has plenty of space and is not restrictive..


RDU ~ 4 months to Terminal 2 Phase 1 opening
User currently offlineBlueWingWalker From United States, joined Apr 2007, 36 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 20667 times:

Everything I've heard "around the water cooler" (and beyond actually) is MCO as a base. I guess we'll all just have to wait and see.


The recipe for perpetual ignorance is to be content with your knowledge and satisfied with your opinion.
User currently offlineAvrocomet From Canada, joined Mar 2007, 18 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 20620 times:

Perhaps my Jetblue to YYZ post from a few weeks ago wasn't as irresponsible and fabricated on rumours as same had indicated.

User currently offlineFWAERJ From United States, joined Jun 2006, 496 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 20577 times:

Here's my five bets on what will and won't happen at JetBlue in the near future:

Moving many of the E190s out west: 100%. The bugs have been worked out, and Barger has made many hints about moving some of the E190s out West.

Tests of buy-on-board: 100%. Buy-on-board, as long as it's restricted to meals and such, would be a good idea for B6. Some people don't have time for buying a meal at JFK. And since this is JetBlue, they could throw in some innovative twists... maybe B6 could be the first airline to offer fresh-grilled panini sandwiches (served with Terra Blue chips, of course) on board. Still, they need to stay away from selling Fossil watches and Vera Wang Princess perfume like Skybus does. Oh, and keep the snacks and Coke free, so you'll keep pax happy.

In-flight Wi-Fi: 100%. Virgin America is launching it next year, and Southwest is seriously considering it, too, so JetBlue will need it for competitive reasons. After all, you know that it's mainstream when every new laptop has it and when Apple put Wi-Fi and a web browser in the iPod touch. B6's LiveTV division already has the spectrum from the FCC and is developing the system, so I could see them launching it real soon. But will it be free to all pax or pay-per-use?

The long-rumored Midwestern focus city: 80%. Someday, B6 has to have a Midwestern focus city of some sort. Currently, B6 only serves ORD and CMH in the Midwest (I consider PIT to be East Coast), and they need more Midwestern cities. A strategically-placed Midwestern focus city like STL with about 8 Midwestern cities plus JFK, BOS, SFO, and LGB after the first 3 months of launch would work great.

Merger with Delta Air Lines: 0%. Dave Barger doesn't want JetBlue to merge with Delta. Period. Richard Anderson is salivating over B6, but Barger will do anything to stop a red widget from appearing on JetBlue's tails.

[Edited 2007-09-16 16:14:12]


"All airlines say they want your business. But when you buy a ticket, not all airlines act like it."- An AS ad
User currently offlineJetBlueGuy2006 From United States, joined Jan 2006, 1243 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 20486 times:

Quoting FWAERJ (Reply 11):

The long-rumored Midwestern focus city: 80%. Someday, B6 has to have a Midwestern focus city of some sort. Currently, B6 only serves ORD and CMH in the Midwest (I consider PIT to be East Coast), and they need more Midwestern cities. A strategically-placed Midwestern focus city like STL with about 8 Midwestern cities plus JFK, BOS, SFO, and LGB after the first 3 months of launch would work great.

This would make sense. They didn't even serve the midwest for a long time, and if they opened a Midwestern Focus City, I would think they would bring more service to Ohio, Illinois and make a long awaited entry into Michigan

And while I agree they will probably move some of the E-jets out west, I would think they would start with about 5 and see how they do. It would have been nice to see them try and get the E-jet certifed as a "regional" jet for use at LGB, so they are not as slot restricted.


Home Airport: Capital Region International Airport (KLAN)
User currently offlineWhappeh From United States, joined Mar 2006, 1210 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 20417 times:

Quoting BlueWingWalker (Reply 9):
Everything I've heard "around the water cooler" (and beyond actually) is MCO as a base. I guess we'll all just have to wait and see.

Which would mean MCO-PWM direct....  Big grin


-Travel now, journey infinitely.
User currently offlineCarls From Germany, joined Aug 2007, 226 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 20371 times:

They are about to place an order for a Long haul flight.
A330 is the one they will choose because fleet commonality. First Flight should be in May 2008.


Thank !!
User currently offlineTOLtommy From United States, joined Dec 2003, 2181 posts, RR: 3
Reply 15, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 20294 times:

Quoting Carls (Reply 14):
They are about to place an order for a Long haul flight.
A330 is the one they will choose because fleet commonality. First Flight should be in May 2008.

That wouldnt surprise me. Someone has to chase the legacies over the pond. Midwest focus city works as well. Of course it may not be anything related to customers, and might just be a new crew base opening. But theres a lot of opportunity for B6 in the midwest, lets hope they start using those 190's to take advantage of some opportunities.

User currently offlineERJ170 From United States, joined Apr 2004, 5389 posts, RR: 13
Reply 16, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 20276 times:

Quoting FWAERJ (Reply 11):
The long-rumored Midwestern focus city: 80%. Someday, B6 has to have a Midwestern focus city of some sort. Currently, B6 only serves ORD and CMH in the Midwest (I consider PIT to be East Coast), and they need more Midwestern cities. A strategically-placed Midwestern focus city like STL with about 8 Midwestern cities plus JFK, BOS, SFO, and LGB after the first 3 months of launch would work great.

I disagree. Long-rumored Midwest focus city: 20%. Do they really need it to serve more midwest cities? No!! They could just as easily serve the Midwestern cities from all their current hubs and focus cities efficiently with the E90. Having a midwestern hub/focus city just for midwestern cities is inefficient. Like I said many times before, anything jetBlue wants to do in the midwest, they can do it from their east and west coast hubs and focus cities.. just like they are doing with Chicago...


RDU ~ 4 months to Terminal 2 Phase 1 opening
User currently offlineDazed767 From United States, joined May 1999, 4789 posts, RR: 50
Reply 17, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 20215 times:

Quoting BlueWingWalker (Reply 9):
Everything I've heard "around the water cooler" (and beyond actually) is MCO as a base. I guess we'll all just have to wait and see.

Scoop up those empty airtran gates next door before WN does, then it could happen.


I know a thing or two about a thing or two...
User currently offlineThirteenRight From United States, joined Jun 2007, 264 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 20168 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting BlueWingWalker (Reply 9):
Everything I've heard "around the water cooler" (and beyond actually) is MCO as a base. I guess we'll all just have to wait and see.

I'd bet money on this one. Its long been rumored. I see a base announcement coupled with expansion of flights.

Quoting Carls (Reply 14):
They are about to place an order for a Long haul flight.
A330 is the one they will choose because fleet commonality. First Flight should be in May 2008.

I doubt B6 is ready for a 3rd fleet type.

User currently offlineSkyyMaster From , joined today!, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (1 year 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 20140 times:

Given that B6 has already announced a/c delivery slow downs and is selling a handful of 320's, I can't see where a "huge" expansion would happen anywhere. I agree no one hints of a merger a month ahead of time, especially when the airline, in this case B6, would probably be the buyee and not the buyer unless they are looking at someone smaller. More than likely it just going to be a few new routes, maybe shifting a few flights off of JFK in anticipation of what is likely to be mandated reductions by the FAA. Otherwise, I think it sounds a lot like another sensational a.net "what if" thread.