Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Go To Top | Help | Search 
South African Plane Hits Truck On Tarmac (Video)  
User currently offlineBeefer From United States, joined Jun 2003, 390 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 months 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 10632 times:

Searched and couldn't find that this had been posted on here before:


Airplane Knocks Over Truck - Watch more free videos

Not a good day for that Pilot!!!!

36 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineNuori5084 From United States, joined Nov 2007, 114 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (8 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 10496 times:

Tag, you're it...

I guess it did less damage to the wing since the trailer was empty?


Failure to plan on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part.
User currently offlineUmfolozi From South Africa, joined Apr 2007, 331 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (8 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 10440 times:

Happened on December 10th.

http://www.lusakatimes.com/?p=1674


Next year.....the big Four Zero!
User currently offlineSBBRTech From Brazil, joined Jul 2007, 722 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (8 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 10369 times:



Quoting Umfolozi (Reply 2):

Gosh, if you read that report before watching the video you can almost believe that the plane smashed the truck at top landing speed and people went berserk inside the a/c.


"I'm beginning to get the hang of this flying business" - C3PO
User currently offlineUmfolozi From South Africa, joined Apr 2007, 331 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 10344 times:

Quoting SBBRTech (Reply 3):
Quoting Umfolozi (Reply 2):

Gosh, if you read that report before watching the video you can almost believe that the plane smashed the truck at top landing speed and people went berserk inside the a/c.

"Panic gripped onlookers and passengers at the Lusaka International airport when a South African airways passenger plane hit into a stationary truck upon arrival from Johannesburg."

And it was a B737-800 and not a -700! SAA does not have -700's. The media sometimes......  no 

[Edited 2007-12-27 05:30:07]


Next year.....the big Four Zero!
User currently offlineWILCO737 From Germany, joined Jun 2004, 3804 posts, RR: 65
Reply 5, posted (8 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 10339 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR



Quoting Beefer (Thread starter):

ouch.... thats why I always try to look out and see if there is something in the way! problem on the MD11F is: you cannot see the wingtip from the flight deck... so I always hope she fits through

WILCO737 (MD11F)
 airplane 


No comment
User currently offlineLexy From United States, joined Jun 2006, 994 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (8 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 10329 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

That's actually kinda funny to see.


Nashville, Tennessee KBNA
User currently offlineRadialman From Canada, joined Aug 2001, 32 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (8 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 10255 times:

And the pilot just keeps on taxing along.Would have thought that he would stop and investigate

User currently offlineWILCO737 From Germany, joined Jun 2004, 3804 posts, RR: 65
Reply 8, posted (8 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 10239 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR



Quoting Radialman (Reply 7):
And the pilot just keeps on taxing along.Would have thought that he would stop and investigate

Yeah, thats what I thought as well! I am pretty sure you felt it how the wingtip hit the truck... but who knows what they were thinking there up front...  crazy   Wink

WILCO737 (MD11F)
 airplane 


No comment
User currently offlineKaiGywer From United States, joined Oct 2003, 10363 posts, RR: 30
Reply 9, posted (8 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 9864 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CUSTOMER SERVICE & SUPPORT



Quoting Radialman (Reply 7):
And the pilot just keeps on taxing along.Would have thought that he would stop and investigate

If you watch all the way to the end, you'll see the tipped over truck right behind the plane, so he didn't go too far


I exercise my right to keep and arm bears!
User currently offlineUAL747 From United States, joined Dec 1999, 5657 posts, RR: 15
Reply 10, posted (8 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 9755 times:

Wow, it gives you the impression of how heavy the aircraft is if it can just knock over a truck like a matchstick!

UAL

User currently offlineUmfolozi From South Africa, joined Apr 2007, 331 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (8 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 9601 times:

Moment of impact!!!




Next year.....the big Four Zero!
User currently offlineSpeedbird128 From South Africa, joined Oct 2003, 696 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (8 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 9348 times:

Yes SAA at it's sterling best again... At least they didn't vacate the runway (go ploughing) onto the grass/sand as they did in CPT...

Captains side too...  banghead   duck 

[Edited 2007-12-27 14:38:36]


Three letters and some numbers...
User currently offlineFAEDC3 From Ecuador, joined Jun 2007, 117 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (8 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 9253 times:

I didn't think that the wing/winglet could be so sturdy... I mean, the hit is hard enough to tip over the truck.... and the wing does not receive a lot of damage.... impressive if you ask me

User currently offlineKELPkid From United States, joined Nov 2005, 3337 posts, RR: 3
Reply 14, posted (8 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 9216 times:



Quoting WILCO737 (Reply 5):
problem on the MD11F is: you cannot see the wingtip from the flight deck

So then what's the point of those gigantic side windows behind the windshield that the DC-10's and MD-11's have?  eyebrow 


Rulebooks and regulations are made from paper...and they do a poor job at preventing metal from contacting rock-Ernest G
User currently offlineWILCO737 From Germany, joined Jun 2004, 3804 posts, RR: 65
Reply 15, posted (8 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 9140 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR



Quoting KELPkid (Reply 14):
So then what's the point of those gigantic side windows behind the windshield that the DC-10's and MD-11's have? eyebrow

to enjoy the nice view to everywhere except the wingtips Big grin You konw the MD11 flight deck is a panorama deck Big grin

WILCO737 (MD11F)
 airplane 


No comment
User currently offlineChristianLee15 From , joined today!, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (8 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 9088 times:



Quoting News Report:
No casualties were recorded and both airport and airline officials further refused to state the number of passengers on board citing security reasons.

And the press needed to know the number of S.O.B why? It's not as if this is an incident that particularly requires that kind of information from the press.

User currently offlineJetblueguy22 From United States, joined Nov 2007, 720 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (8 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 8912 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting ChristianLee15 (Reply 16):
And the press needed to know the number of S.O.B why?

So they can go and blow it up and say out of 115 pax 45 were injured and it was a horrible accident. Come on we all know how the press likes to blow things up!
Blue


Saab 340:Like a pack of gum going half the speed of smell-Ron White
User currently offlineUAL747 From United States, joined Dec 1999, 5657 posts, RR: 15
Reply 18, posted (8 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 8864 times:

I love the lady laughing hysterically. "With his wings!!"

UAL

User currently offlineDurangoMac From United States, joined Dec 2006, 173 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (8 months 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 7937 times:

My thoughts, either the taxiway and the painted line was way to close to the parking area for ground equipment or the pilot was way off the line.

I'm surprised it didn't take the wing right off. Show's you how sturdy those flying machines are.

User currently offlineLincoln From United States, joined Nov 2004, 3070 posts, RR: 7
Reply 20, posted (8 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 7814 times:



Quoting Umfolozi (Reply 2):

http://www.lusakatimes.com/?p=1674

Uh...wow. 9 paragraphs to, essentially say, "No one would talk to us and we're pissed that the airport staff is following directions and not letting us get up close and personal"? And a little sensationalistic to boot -- "Panic gripped on lookers and passengers at the Lusaka International airport..."

Quoting DurangoMac (Reply 19):
I'm surprised it didn't take the wing right off. Show's you how sturdy those flying machines are.

I would be more than a little concerned if such a relatively slight impact so far out on the wing took it of -- remember how much the engine hanging off that wing weighs and how much weight (passengers + bags + fuel) it's supporting when you're in the air.


CO Is My Airline of Choice || Baggage Claim is an airline's last chance to disappoint a customer || Next flts in profile
User currently offlineDurangoMac From United States, joined Dec 2006, 173 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (8 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 7737 times:



Quoting Lincoln (Reply 20):
I would be more than a little concerned if such a relatively slight impact so far out on the wing took it of -- remember how much the engine hanging off that wing weighs and how much weight (passengers + bags + fuel) it's supporting when you're in the air.

I was be sarcastic!  duck 

User currently offlineLincoln From United States, joined Nov 2004, 3070 posts, RR: 7
Reply 22, posted (8 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 7701 times:



Quoting DurangoMac (Reply 21):
I was be sarcastic!

Sorry missed the sarcasam, still working off the Christmas jetlag!  Smile


CO Is My Airline of Choice || Baggage Claim is an airline's last chance to disappoint a customer || Next flts in profile