Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Details Emerge On Lockheed Polecat UAV  
User currently offlineRichardPrice From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 7319 times:

Lockheed have released sketchy details about their latest UAV, the Polecat.



http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles...ses+picture+of+secret+Polecat.html

More details as they are released.

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineOkelleynyc From United States, joined Feb 2006, 219 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 7293 times:

Wow,

Wish we could see more of it. Interesting that they would choose the name Polecat. For all of you non-southerners out there, a polecat is a skunk.

This must be a "special" aircraft for the Skunk Works to give it that designation.

It looks similar in size to the old DarkStar?


Just give me my Vario, my Ozone Mojo and a gorgeous day of soaring.
User currently offlineSLCPilot From United States, joined Aug 2003, 356 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 7244 times:

This aircraft may be a missing link to the Tier 3 program of several years ago, and the plane sighted by U-2 crews during Gulf War 2. I can understand why the manned community may feel threatened by this vehicle. It is an indication of the nomenclature used by Lockheed for their projects.

It also looks like a hybrid B-2/Darkstar with two engines. The article suggests low boom, supersonic flight in the same breath, so I infer the sweep angle may be greater than what the picture suggests.

I'll be interested to see how many references to this aircraft were in front of us but not recognized by us not "in the know".

As always, here's a challange to everyone out there to reveal an aircraft not already known to the public, and have their reference backed up in the future when it is shown for the first time!

Cheers!

SLCPilot


I don't like to be fueled by anger, I don't like to be fooled by lust...
User currently offlineOkelleynyc From United States, joined Feb 2006, 219 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 7219 times:

Here's some more details from AWST....

Fair use excerpt:

Quote:
Lockheed Martin's twin-engine, 90-ft. wingspan UAV has performed two flights below 15,000 ft. However, the tail-less "Horton" flying wing design -- similar to that of the B-2. Flight testing of the so-called Polecat is expected to reach increasingly higher altitudes this summer.

The company designed the single prototype for about $27 million and officials say it has not led to a production vehicle.

Lockheed Martin Skunk Works, the rapid prototyping arm of the military aircraft making giant, began designing the UAV in March 2003 and had it ready for first flight 18 months later. Program officials say an unusually rainy season at the Nellis Test Range forced them to slow their flight plans.

The UAV can carry 1,000 lbs. of weapons or sensors in a bay on the underbelly of the aircraft. Gross takeoff weight is 9,000 lbs.

http://www.aviationnow.com/avnow/new...defense_story.jsp?id=news/POLE.xml


Just give me my Vario, my Ozone Mojo and a gorgeous day of soaring.
User currently offlineLumberton From United States, joined Jul 2005, 3549 posts, RR: 13
Reply 4, posted (2 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 7195 times:

Quoting Okelleynyc (Reply 3):
The company designed the single prototype for about $27 million and officials say it has not led to a production vehicle.

$27 Million! IMO, this is the greatest threat to manned combat vehicles.  old 


"When all is said and done, more will be said than done".
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This TopicDetails Emerge On Lockheed Polecat UAV
Username: 


No username? Sign up now!
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!           DETAILED RULES (NEW)
  • Password: 


    Forgot Password? Be reminded.
    Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)

    Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help
    FORUM RULES HAVE CHANGED - READ THEM HERE

    Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


    Similar topics:More similar topics...
    Need Lockheed P-80C Canopy; Working On Restoration posted Thu Jun 5 2003 01:09:01 by DeltaMD11
    Space A Travel On Uscg Aircraft posted Wed Nov 15 2006 23:40:00 by Reedyreed
    I Think I Am Almost Over Missing Out On The F-14. posted Fri Nov 10 2006 23:21:56 by 747400sp
    Museum C-141 On Sale For Scrap posted Thu Nov 2 2006 18:07:23 by DeltaGuy
    Rcaf Order Status On C-17 posted Wed Nov 1 2006 07:13:19 by ZBBYLW
    Indonesia - UAV's From Israel? posted Sun Oct 22 2006 20:45:21 by 7474ever
    Toilets On Military Planes? posted Mon Oct 16 2006 05:18:27 by LimaNiner
    Lockheed Martin Studies Lunar Lander Design posted Wed Oct 11 2006 15:30:47 by AerospaceFan
    Orion Cockpit To Be Based On 787 posted Sat Oct 7 2006 04:43:32 by N328KF
    Unusual Aircraft On Approach At Kdma posted Tue Oct 3 2006 19:35:39 by SABE

    Your ad here!
    Printer friendly format