Checkerboard
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2001 10:07 pm

F-20

Thu Oct 18, 2001 9:29 pm

Could anyone tell me what's wrong about F-20 Tigershark? Why no one bought it?
Thanks in advance
 
usair1489
Posts: 367
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2000 5:22 am

RE: F-20

Thu Oct 18, 2001 10:30 pm

I believe Air & Space Magazine ran a huge article about the aircraft and why it wasn't successful. I forget when the article was published.

Steve
Zinger Aviation Delta Oscar Tango Charlie Oscar Mike
 
cannibalz3
Posts: 382
Joined: Mon May 21, 2001 2:10 pm

RE: F-20

Fri Oct 19, 2001 5:02 am

The Air & Space article pretty much says (if I remember correctly) that the F-20 failed because it was built for foreign customers that used the F-5 but couldn't buy F-16 replacements for them, because there was a restriction on them. About the time the F-20 came out, which by all accounts I know of was an excellent airplane, the ban on F-16s was lifted, so everyone bought them instead. Hope this helps.
-Zach
 
GDB
Posts: 12653
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 6:25 pm

RE: F-20

Wed Oct 24, 2001 3:49 am

The US not buying any did not help, not that they required it.
Never underestimate the 'penis envy' factor in some purchases of fighter aircraft in some parts of the world.
 
fireblade
Posts: 515
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 10:13 am

GDB

Wed Oct 24, 2001 3:53 am

'penis envy factor in some purchases of fighter aircraft in some part of the world'
What do you mean GDB?
Please explain it.
 
GDB
Posts: 12653
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 6:25 pm

Fireblade

Thu Oct 25, 2001 12:56 am

How best to explain? You are some second or third level air force, with a limited budget, you want a new fighter. (If any of your potential enemies have supersonic fighters, you could maybe use one, if not, a good armed trainer like the Hawk 100/200).
But no....you want a big manly top of the range F-16, like the big boys have.
Or maybe you do need a cheapish fighter, the F-20 is made for you, at this time in the 1980's it's weapon options are as good as most F-16's.
But no....the USAF and NATO has F-16's, so you've gotta have 'em. Never mind the F-20 will be easier and cheaper to maintain, important factors in combat.
Imagine these guys like South Park's Eric Cartman, 'I wanna F-16 dammit!'
Clear now?
 
jwenting
Posts: 9973
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2001 10:12 pm

RE: F-20

Thu Oct 25, 2001 3:34 am

Wrong aircraft at the wrong time.
It was designed to replace the F-5 as the aircraft for the US to provide in their program to arm poor allies, but by the time it was ready for production those countries the program was dead and the countries chose the more sexy F-16 (which has better specs) to replace it.
I wish I were flying
 
Boeing Nut
Posts: 5078
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2001 2:42 am

RE: F-20

Fri Nov 02, 2001 7:39 am

This is one of the "greatest aircraft that never flew".

To bad politics got on the way of this aircraft being a reality. I remember one of it's strong points was that it could go from cold start to 10,000 ft. in less than a minute. Not many, if any, aircraft could do that.
I'm not a real aeronautical engineer, I just play one on Airliners.net.
 
fireblade
Posts: 515
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 10:13 am

RE: F-20

Fri Nov 02, 2001 7:46 am

Thanks GDB i got it now



Slobodan
 
gregoire
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 1:36 am

RE: F-20

Fri Nov 02, 2001 6:38 pm

About penis envy we could also add that it is easy to maintain an aircraft in a big service that one that have not been bought the customer having the choice betwen the F16 and the F20 will have wonder why did the us have not bought the F20 and do we have to pay for the development cost then the F16 was a better plane than the F20 you may like it or not the F16 was a direct competitor of the F20 (as was the Mirage 2000) and the F16 was Better and used in the US so bye bye F20. a similar story happens with the super mirage 4000 that was a heavy fighter for export a great plane never find a customer because not in use in its own country

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AvSafety46, flyingturtle and 11 guests