Aviastar
Topic Author
Posts: 263
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2000 4:57 am

Tu-22: 3 Versions?

Fri Aug 02, 2002 2:46 am

Hi

Have a look at these 3 shots (3 Tu-22):

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Dmitry Avdeev
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Dmitry Avdeev



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Chandler



They have not the same landing gear, the engines are mounted differently, the 2 first aircrafts seem not to have wings which can "move" (what is the exact term in English?). Were these 3 aircrafts designed for different missions or are these differences due to various improvements in comparison with the first model?
 
Boeing4ever
Posts: 4479
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2001 12:06 pm

RE: Tu-22: 3 Versions?

Fri Aug 02, 2002 4:00 am

The first pic is a Tu-22 "Blinder". The third one is the Tu-22M "Backfire" Tupolev chose a different design for their new Tu-22 version. Why they did is beyond me, but the Tu-22M is definately their best!  Big thumbs up

B4e
 
LY744
Posts: 5185
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 11:55 pm

RE: Tu-22: 3 Versions?

Fri Aug 02, 2002 5:20 am

There are essentially two Tu-22's; the Tu-22 and Tu-22M (Top right and bottom pics in your post). As you can see, they are nothing alike, although both are bombers. At the time, the Soviet leadership believed blindly in ICBM's as a long range strategic weapon, practically freezing the creation of new bombers. The Soviet AF (VVS) knew better, so they, in conjunction with the Tupolev DB fooled the bureaucrats into believing that their new bomber is just a modification of a proven design. Sort of like the "Super" Hornet today.  Big grin Big grin

LY744.
Pacifism only works if EVERYBODY practices it
 
jwenting
Posts: 9973
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2001 10:12 pm

RE: Tu-22: 3 Versions?

Fri Aug 02, 2002 4:38 pm

Correct. The 2nd one is a preproduction model of the Tu-22M (a.k.a. Tu-26).
The 2D fixed inlet design was found to be non-optimal for a supersonic bomber and was changed into the 3D moving design seen in the production aircraft.

Also note the refueling nozzle in the nose of the preproduction version which was later removed under a treaty with the US on strategic arms limitations (I think it was a provision of SALT II).
I wish I were flying
 
Aviastar
Topic Author
Posts: 263
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2000 4:57 am

RE: Tu-22: 3 Versions?

Fri Aug 02, 2002 6:23 pm

Thanks!  Big grin
How many were built? Are Russia and Ukraine the only countries operating this plane?
 
jwenting
Posts: 9973
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2001 10:12 pm

RE: Tu-22: 3 Versions?

Fri Aug 02, 2002 6:41 pm

Don't know how many were built (the USSR didn't exactly publish their production figures).

Lybia and Iran also operate them (Tu-22s, not 22Ms). There are reports of China (communist) and possibly Iraq having aqcuired some 22Ms.
Iraq was very interested around 1995, but I think Russia refused to sell them under international pressure to honour the embargo.

AFAIK no other countries have them, and the Lybian and Iranian aircraft may be non-operational.
Maybe some other Soviet republics have small fleets. Kazakhstan comes to mind. But most if not all of those have probably been returned to Russia or Ukraine under the nuclear-disarmement program initiated by the CIS in the 1990s.
I wish I were flying
 
GDB
Posts: 12653
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 6:25 pm

RE: Tu-22: 3 Versions?

Sat Aug 03, 2002 12:04 am

I've heard a story that said the TU-22 designation was repeated for the Backfire from the Blinder to try to fool NATO, especially during the SALT talks.
It was known that the Blinder had only theatre range, and could not threaten the US, unlike the Backfire which could just about with in-flight refuelling and better stand-off weapons.
Of course, getting it past the Soviet beancounters was also likely a factor.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests