It's a stupid comment, on top of the two comments I've asked you to prove already...on top of the F14 comments; which were so erroneous it was laughable.
An F4 as a cruise missile????
Spend millions to do what 2 JSOWs or a 2 JDAMs could do when dropped from an air platform; or what 2 Tomahawks could do from a submarine or surface ship. In terms of dollar cost per pound of munitions dropped, your idea is WWII thinking at best. It's too bad your knowledge of contemporary weapons systems is so poor!
The millions spent in converting an old F4 into a modern weapon with the range, accuracy and reliability required for a modern weapon in the US arsenal makes your statement laughable at best. Two GE J79s, rebuilt so the entire assembly doesn't fail prematurely in to non hostile territory (political efffects??), combined with the dollar cost for a pilot to fly it remotely is hardly a cost effective weapon, and that assumes the airframe was flyable in the first place. Tell the SEcDEf that F4 pilots need to be trained and paid in order to drop 6,000 lbs of munitions from a range of 1600 miles...and he'd say a JSOW will do what 4 F4s would do, more accurately, and more reliably, at 1/10 the cost.
You spout mass amounts of BS on this web site, but you are as clueless as anyone I've encountered to date.