tu144d
Posts: 186
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 11:39 pm

Tu-160 Bomber Crashes In Russia

Tue Sep 23, 2003 6:34 am

http://www.avia.ru/english/articles/doc160.shtml
 
n844aa
Posts: 1266
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 10:38 am

RE: Tu-160 Bomber Crashes In Russia

Tue Sep 23, 2003 8:53 am

New airplanes, new employees, low fares, all touchy-feely ... all of them are losers. -Gordon Bethune
 
keesje
Posts: 8747
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2001 2:08 am

RE: Tu-160 Bomber Crashes In Russia

Thu Sep 25, 2003 12:21 am

A billion bucks & 4 people down the drain ..

"Never mistake motion for action." Ernest Hemingway
 
sovietjet
Posts: 2547
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 12:32 am

RE: Tu-160 Bomber Crashes In Russia

Thu Sep 25, 2003 12:35 am

They should really build some more Tu-160s. Right now only 15 are operational compared to about 100 B-1s. So unfair...
 
Spacepope
Posts: 3151
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 1999 11:10 am

RE: Tu-160 Bomber Crashes In Russia

Thu Sep 25, 2003 6:31 am

100 B-1Bs? Hardly. Try more like 80 at most. And even if Russia wanted them, how the heck do they expect to pay for them? They're still broker than I was in college. INCLUDING the days when I had to ration out the ramen!

T.J.
The last of the famous international playboys
 
sovietjet
Posts: 2547
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 12:32 am

RE: Tu-160 Bomber Crashes In Russia

Thu Sep 25, 2003 11:46 am

Well....even 80 that's still alot compared to 15...if the US is all about "nuclear treaties and limitations" and all that then they should have 15 too. I had a thread bout these treaties earlier.
 
2912n
Posts: 1978
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2001 2:12 pm

RE: Tu-160 Bomber Crashes In Russia

Thu Sep 25, 2003 12:17 pm

I suggest that you do some research about what is "fair" under the treaties that were negotiated between the U.S. and the then Soviet Union.

Here is a link to SALT II http://www.state.gov/www/global/arms/treaties/salt2-2.html

Makes for dry reading but it, along with the other treaties will show you that it was as "fair" as the two governments could make it for the time.

You seem to want to live in the USSR of twenty-five years ago....The fact is that Russia does not need that type of bomber as the threats it faces today are much more internal and from immediate neighbors. Russia is much better off today spending the money on internal development than on high priced power projection.
 
lehpron
Posts: 6846
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2001 3:42 am

RE: Tu-160 Bomber Crashes In Russia

Mon Sep 29, 2003 6:02 am

Isn't the Tu-160 supposed to be heavier and faster, though with less range, than the B-1?
The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests