Posts: 4548
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2001 12:06 am

The US Tanker Deal Again

Sat Dec 13, 2003 6:28 pm

It's becoming clearer and clearer that Darleen Druyun, an Air Force negotiator in the tanker deal who later joined Boeing, was not fighting on the side of the US tax payer, but rather on Boeing's side.

Read this article in the Seattle times:


Some extracts:


In a June 2002 e-mail, Bob Gower, Boeing's vice president for tankers, wrote, "Meeting today on price was very good. Darleen spent most of the time bringing the (U.S. Air Force) price up to our number. We did not finalize the price because the USAF went to caucus on how to present the figures for the business case. It was a good day!"

Earlier the same day, an e-mail from Andrew Ellis, Boeing's vice president of Washington operations, described an effort by Druyun to keep the big liability that the government would face if it terminated the tanker contract early off the president's budget.

"She may be running her own covert operation on this one," Ellis wrote, "so we probably don't want to discuss openly."

The e-mail, congressional watchdogs say, shows that Druyun was on Boeing's team rather than fighting for U.S. taxpayers."


Just days later in April 2002, another Ellis e-mail that went out would prove pivotal in the tanker deal's tangled course.

"Darleen told us several times to keep in mind that EADS' proposed price on green A330 was $5 million to $17 million cheaper than green 767," the e-mail said.

European Aeronautic Defence & Space is the European parent of Airbus, Boeing's major rival in the commercial aviation business. "Green" refers to a basic aircraft model before it has been modified for refueling purposes.

EADS wasn't invited to bid on the tanker contract but volunteered that it could supply less expensive tankers that would save taxpayers billions of dollars.

It was that e-mail that prompted the Pentagon's inspector general to open an investigation of the tanker deal in September. Transferring proprietary price information from one bidder to another is not allowed under government procurement regulations."
Posts: 2037
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2002 12:34 am

RE: The US Tanker Deal Again

Sun Dec 14, 2003 6:51 am

This may or may not be connected but the decission by the UK government to announce the FSTA winner has been put back a month.

If Boeing knew the price that EADs had bid then it is reasonable to assume that it would be fed to the BAES/Boeing team submitting the FSTA bid. Although there is more than just the cost of supplying aircraft for FSTA, it must give them some advantage.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ramair and 1 guest

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos