bsergonomics
Posts: 458
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 5:07 am

Silliest Design Standard

Thu Feb 24, 2005 9:54 am

OK, this isn't just limited to design stuff, but...

During the course of designing various aircraft, it has been my fortune (and, sometimes, misfortune) to have had to hand numerous design standards. For us Human Factors bods out there, our bibles include MIL-STD-1472, Def Stan 00-25 and, of course, the veritable Def Stan 00-970.

The big difference between US miltary standards (MIL-STD's - available through http://assist.daps.dla.mil/online/start/ , but you need to register/apply) and the UK Defence Standards (Def Stan's - go to http://www.dstan.mod.uk/ ) is that the US military thinks further ahead... Once the design is complete, then it has to be tested. Therefore, the standards include not only specifications for stuff, but also test methods and the correct way of reporting test failures.

From time to time, one comes across standards that seem to have kept someone more busy writing them than those actually building the relevant equipment. My favourite comes from the States: the "must have" for every designer's pocket... MIL-B-44229 - Beef and Carrots In Gravy, thermostabilised, tray pack (now, apparently, cancelled). It not only has the full specification for the beef, the carrots AND the gravy (and all constituent parts, as well as foreign objects), it also has the procedure for reporting any failures. For example, "Major Failure Code 06: Carrots are hard or tough", or, "Code 12: Gravy is lumpy."

I understand that there is also a Def Stan for "Mars Bars", dating back to the Falklands War, but I've never seen it, so I can't verify if that is true. A search of current standards provides no info on current UK military chocolate bar standards.

So, the question: what is the silliest standard you've ever been asked to design something to, or to work to (both civil and military standards)?
The definition of a 'Pessimist': an Optimist with experience...
 
lehpron
Posts: 6846
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2001 3:42 am

RE: Silliest Design Standard

Thu Feb 24, 2005 4:42 pm

Well being a student engineer, it is my pet peeve to hear the word "proven" and "practical", do they count? Big grin

I know what they mean in terms of aviation.
The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Stitch and 2 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos