UAopsMGR
Topic Author
Posts: 90
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 4:03 am

Space Shuttle Return To Flight May 15. Too Early?

Wed Mar 02, 2005 4:44 am

I'm looking forward to the return of the US Space Shuttle program in May, but is NASA ready to launch without a certain fix to the problems that brought down STS-107? The repair methods look sketchy.
Kids, you tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is, never try.- Homer Simpson
 
SATL382G
Posts: 2679
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 12:02 am

RE: Space Shuttle Return To Flight May 15. Too Early?

Wed Mar 02, 2005 6:47 am

IMHO they should have returned to flight as soon as they fixed the ET. They are trying to make the thing risk-free and it will never be so.

NASA should finish ISS with shuttle and then send shuttle to the Smithsonian. Press on with CEV or whatever the next gen manned spacecraft is going to be... Just make sure to incorporate crew escape and a robust thermal protection system.
"There’s nothing quite as exhilarating as being shot at and missed" --Winston Churchill
 
f86sabre
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2001 12:44 pm

RE: Space Shuttle Return To Flight May 15. Too Early?

Wed Mar 02, 2005 8:35 am

SATL382G hit the nail on the head. If this stuff was easy and risk free then everyone would be doing it. Every job in the world has a certain amount of risk associated with it. The astronauts know the risks and are ready to get on with it. While undue risk is not a good thing, you can't make anything 100% risk free.

I wish NASA and the government would pursue a goal that would get the worlds imagination fired up. I think the time is right for us to do something bold and lasting.

Best wishes,
F86sabre
 
COAMiG29
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 10:30 am

RE: Space Shuttle Return To Flight May 15. Too Early?

Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:40 am

i personally think nasa should ground the shuttle now and put it in the smithsonian and start the next gen now till then work on the iss with soviet equipment that has proven itself over the years
If Continental had a hub at DFW with nonstop flights I would always fly them, unfortunantely good things take time.
 
SATL382G
Posts: 2679
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 12:02 am

RE: Space Shuttle Return To Flight May 15. Too Early?

Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:03 am

Russian equipment does not have the lift capacity to finish the station. ISS equipment was designed for shuttle launch. So you've got to have shuttle to finish it.
"There’s nothing quite as exhilarating as being shot at and missed" --Winston Churchill
 
greaser
Posts: 1040
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2004 5:55 pm

RE: Space Shuttle Return To Flight May 15. Too Early?

Wed Mar 02, 2005 4:33 pm

Quoting SATL382G (reply 4):
Russian equipment does not have the lift capacity to finish the station. ISS equipment was designed for shuttle launch. So you've got to have shuttle to finish it.

Absolutely...though there is still alot of contraversy regarding ISS, though i personally support it. How many years does it have left?? 10??
Finish the missions, get it done right first time. Retire the venerable shuttle, begin the competition phase for the shuttles i.e this year or 2006. even though retirement is schelduled for 2010, 2006 would't be early to start R&D.
Now you're really flying
 
SATL382G
Posts: 2679
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 12:02 am

RE: Space Shuttle Return To Flight May 15. Too Early?

Wed Mar 02, 2005 10:54 pm

Keep in mind also that that the real problem behind both shuttle accidents was management. Management at NASA in both cases knew of the technical problem and failed to act to prevent the accident.

Sure shuttle is fragile and therefore dangerous. But when a problem presents itself you deal with it and then go fly.
"There’s nothing quite as exhilarating as being shot at and missed" --Winston Churchill
 
UAopsMGR
Topic Author
Posts: 90
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 4:03 am

RE: Space Shuttle Return To Flight May 15. Too Early?

Thu Mar 03, 2005 1:37 pm

Well said SATL382G,

Insulation shredding has been an issue since the very first flights. Up until the 2002 incident during the launch of Atlantis when insulation loss came to within 6-inches of the SRB electrical box, the shredding was considered an "acceptable risk" by NASA managers, at which point it drew some attention, but obviously not enough.

Hopefully, the redesigned tank for STS-114 will in fact be the safest NASA has flown. In any case, I'm looking forward to being at the Cape on May 15th.
Kids, you tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is, never try.- Homer Simpson
 
lehpron
Posts: 6846
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2001 3:42 am

RE: Space Shuttle Return To Flight May 15. Too Early?

Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:12 am

Quoting SATL382G (reply 1):
NASA should finish ISS with shuttle and then send shuttle to the Smithsonian. Press on with CEV or whatever the next gen manned spacecraft is going to be... Just make sure to incorporate crew escape and a robust thermal protection system.


I so completely incredible agree with you on that.

IMO, I think they should dump a load of cash on the Hyper-X program and anything that spawns out of it. NASA has lost touch with their aeronautical aspect, they might as well be called NSA. At least this way it may speed up an already lacking space program. Anyone that knows anything about the way a business works is that you have to spend money to get money and in NASA's case, you got to spend money to gain knowledge.

[Edited 2005-03-06 23:20:36]
The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 14002
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

RE: Space Shuttle Return To Flight May 15. Too Early?

Sat Mar 26, 2005 11:37 pm

When it comes to manned space exploration, I'm a cynic.

The space shuttle has been about pork barrel politics right from the start, with its ridiculously unachievable goals of cost per flight, cost per pound uplifted and number of flights per year. And putting congressmen in space - how pathetic!

The space station largely exists to pull tax dollars into the aerospace sector, (initially) as an unemployment program for Russian scientists and as a way to give the shuttle something to do (I guess they were running low on congressmen who wanted a hop). Even after decades and tens of billions of dollars, at best it has a tiny chance to achieve a tiny fraction of the science it was initially built to perform.

Manned space flight is not worth the outlandish, exorbonent, ridiculous costs involved nor the risk to human life it entails (even if the astronauts accept the risk, it's us who get to morn when they die), especially given the meager return of scientific information.

If it had been up to me, I would have cancelled the space station in the late 80s and diverted the money to unmanned space exploration, high energy physics, oceanography, earth sciences, or just kept it in the treasury. As a side effect, the space shuttle would probably have been retired by now.
Inspiration, move me brightly! Light the song with sense and color.
Hold away despair, more than this I will not ask.
Faced with mysteries dark and vast, statements just seem vain at last.
Some rise, some fall, some climb, to get to Terrapin!
 
Cadet985
Posts: 1958
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2002 6:45 am

RE: Space Shuttle Return To Flight May 15. Too Early?

Mon Mar 28, 2005 4:00 am

Quoting SATL382G (Reply 1):
IMHO they should have returned to flight as soon as they fixed the ET. They are trying to make the thing risk-free and it will never be so.

Absolutely right. When you have like a million pounds of rocket fuel under you, nothing is risk free. Each time a space shuttle re-enters the atmosphere, there are a million things that can go wrong, as we saw with Columbia.

Marc
 
GDB
Posts: 12653
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 6:25 pm

RE: Space Shuttle Return To Flight May 15. Too Early?

Mon Mar 28, 2005 6:05 am

Finish the ISS, retire the Shuttle, get the CEV on track with the most simple, robust launch system possible.

Then get back to the Moon, not cheap but nowhere near Apollo costs either, in any case pick the right launch vehicle for CEV and putting one up each time should be much cheaper than Shuttle.

And that is where Shuttle fell down, it required the same infrastructure and manpower to put a Shuttle into low Earth orbit as it took to put a Saturn V up to either put people on the Moon or launch a Space Station in one go (Skylab).

So NASA (and the American taxpayer) would have been better off carrying on with Apollo/Saturn, developing these vehicles.
A boosted Saturn V could have put a station up with a tiny faction of the costs (and risks) of those dozens of Shuttle flights required for ISS, without the extensive EVA's once in orbit too.

You cannot replicate Saturn now, you can however use Shuttle derived SSME/ET/SRB to lift heavy loads, with Delta IV Heavy for other unmanned launches, for a Earth Orbit CEV launch, first stage is a single SRB, 2nd is a modernized Apollo era J-2 (12 left, production equipment still exists, with an Apollo style escape system at the top.
 
cloudy
Posts: 1613
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2002 3:23 pm

RE: Space Shuttle Return To Flight May 15. Too Early?

Thu Mar 31, 2005 5:18 pm

NASA should finish ISS with shuttle and then send shuttle to the Smithsonian. Press on with CEV or whatever the next gen manned spacecraft is going to be... Just make sure to incorporate crew escape and a robust thermal protection system.
---

That is more or less what they are doing. There may be a few extra flights here and there, but for the most part, the shuttle will do only ISS construction and some resupply. At least that is the plan. We will see if this will really happen.

I have my doubts as to whether the CEV or any new manned space vehicle will actually fly in the next decade, however. NASA's standard pattern is to study any new spacecraft idea to death and then drop it. This has happened every time a new manned spacecraft since the shuttle has been seriously proposed by anyone. As others have said, there are to many entrenched interests that need the space shuttle. These interests stretch all the way from the Johnson Space Center to Boeing's and Lockheed's facilities on the West Coast. If the shuttle is to be replaced, these people will accept nothing less than a vehicle at least equally capable and expensive to operate. This is never said out loud but it does not need to be. Preserving jobs for voters in the right districts, profits for campaign contributers, and empires for bearaucrats are what matters.

The only way I can see the CEV being actually built is if one of these things happen....

1. It gets as expensive and pork-laden as the shuttle.

2. Some foreign government(probably China) puts up something else just as good and makes NASA, etc. look bad.

3. Some private group competing for America's Space Prize begins to approach NASA in capability.

4. Another accident forces the shuttles into permanent retirement. If this happens, look for number #1 above to happen as well.

The CEV wouldn't be that hard to build. Its goals are laughably easy. The Apollo command and service module did essentially the same things we want out of a CEV, except with 3 crew rather than 6 or 7. When there was competition, public pressure, and national prestige on the line, we built it with 1960's technology. Only government without competion could seriously be proposing to take as much time and money to build the CEV as NASA is planning to take.

IN SHORT...The shuttle(or something else almost as bad) will remain unless NASA gets some competition. In fact, nothing real will be done in space unless NASA gets some competition. This is just the nature of government.
 
SATL382G
Posts: 2679
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 12:02 am

RE: Space Shuttle Return To Flight May 15. Too Early?

Fri Apr 01, 2005 1:58 am

Quoting Cloudy (Reply 12):
If the shuttle is to be replaced, these people will accept nothing less than a vehicle at least equally capable and expensive to operate.

Agreed there are many entrenched interests.

However, shuttle was designed with military interests and capabilities in mind. Many of these capabilities were never used, such as the one orbit polar mission. A civilian spacecraft, capable of emulating the shuttle missions/capabilities that were flown, would be considerably cheaper.

FYI: The one orbit polar mission would have launched south out of Vandenberg, deployed it's payload, and then landed back at Vandenberg. Since Vandenberg would have "moved" (earths rotation) approx. 1500 miles since launch, a 1500 mile reentry cross range capability was required. This cross range capability is what drove the shuttle design both aerodynamically and thermally.

[Edited 2005-03-31 18:12:14]
"There’s nothing quite as exhilarating as being shot at and missed" --Winston Churchill
 
cloudy
Posts: 1613
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2002 3:23 pm

RE: Space Shuttle Return To Flight May 15. Too Early?

Fri Apr 01, 2005 5:36 pm

However, shuttle was designed with military interests and capabilities in mind. Many of these capabilities were never used, such as the one orbit polar mission. A civilian spacecraft, capable of emulating the shuttle missions/capabilities that were flown, would be considerably cheaper.
-----

This is true. The CEV (if it ever gets built) does have some positive aspects. Another good thing is that the CEV seperates the launch vehicle from the spacecraft. When private industry and the military improve launch vehicles, the CEV could take advantage of these improvements. It also makes the vehicle much easier and less expensive to build if all it has to do is fly in space and return to earth. Launch to earth orbit is a seperate problem that deserves a seperate solution. Seperating the launch vehicle from the payload also confines government contol and investment to where government control and investment is needed.

Another shuttle capability that rarely got used is the ability to bring back a large cargo from space.
 
TedTAce
Posts: 9098
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 12:31 am

RE: Space Shuttle Return To Flight May 15. Too Early?

Sun Apr 03, 2005 1:43 am

http://www.ksctickets.com/kennedyspacecenter/ltt.html
Tickets for the Space Shuttle Return to Flight launch of STS-114 Discovery will be available for purchase beginning Monday, April 4, at 9 AM EST

I know what I'm doing Monday Morning!!!
This space intentionally left blank
 
SATL382G
Posts: 2679
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 12:02 am

RE: Space Shuttle Return To Flight May 15. Too Early?

Sun Apr 03, 2005 4:53 am

TedTAce,

Thanks for the heads up.... How are you buying your tickets? The website is sort of vague? Do you have to purchase at KSC or can you call - internet?

regards
"There’s nothing quite as exhilarating as being shot at and missed" --Winston Churchill
 
TedTAce
Posts: 9098
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 12:31 am

RE: Space Shuttle Return To Flight May 15. Too Early?

Sun Apr 03, 2005 5:59 am

Quoting SATL382G (Reply 16):
How are you buying your tickets? The website is sort of vague? Do you have to purchase at KSC or can you call - internet?

Monday morning I will be hammering away at the URL http://www.ksctickets.com/kennedyspacecenter/ltt.html
Until it says 'click here to buy'

In RE: "Do you have to purchase at KSC "
You cannot buy them @ KSC on launch day for SURE!!.. You will not even be allowed to get near a place where you could buy them same day (something about post 9/11 security)

The site doesn't say anything about non-web purchases, but you also WILL want to read: http://www.ksctickets.com/kennedyspacecenter/imlaunbrview.html
This space intentionally left blank
 
SATL382G
Posts: 2679
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 12:02 am

RE: Space Shuttle Return To Flight May 15. Too Early?

Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:37 am

Well cool! I think I'm going to join you.....
"There’s nothing quite as exhilarating as being shot at and missed" --Winston Churchill
 
TedTAce
Posts: 9098
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 12:31 am

RE: Space Shuttle Return To Flight May 15. Too Early?

Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:59 am

Quoting SATL382G (Reply 18):
Well cool! I think I'm going to join you.....

Look for the big geek with the little wimpy camera Big grin
This space intentionally left blank
 
UAalltheway
Posts: 1358
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 8:31 am

RE: Space Shuttle Return To Flight May 15. Too Early?

Thu Apr 07, 2005 8:48 am

20 bucks says the shuttle won't be up by May 15th. NASA keeps saying they will have it up by a certain date, and than they usually fall through on it. They released a little over a year ago that they would have it up by September of 03 or 04 or something.. and of course that never happend. Maybe NASA just keep releasing these dates to try to boost hopes of civialians or something.
 
TedTAce
Posts: 9098
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 12:31 am

RE: Space Shuttle Return To Flight May 15. Too Early?

Thu Apr 07, 2005 8:56 am

Quoting UAalltheway (Reply 20):
20 bucks says the shuttle won't be up by May 15th.

Anyone who bets against you (no matter how optimistic they are) is a sucker.

I would LOVE to see you proved wrong, but I'm not even close to foolish enough to think that May 15th will see a Shuttle launch.

BTW did you hear about the crack they found on the ET today that (once again) delayed rollout? It's rolling to the pad as I type, but I'll be floored if the 15th passes us with a launched shuttle.
This space intentionally left blank
 
SATL382G
Posts: 2679
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 12:02 am

RE: Space Shuttle Return To Flight May 15. Too Early?

Thu Apr 07, 2005 10:00 am

I'm hoping it is delayed. Fewer people will be able to go watch the launch. Which means I'll have a better view.....  Smile

I didn't get the tickets either....

Has NASA TV ever covered the entire rollout to the pad before as they did today? Dry viewing yes, but never having seen the whole procedure....
"There’s nothing quite as exhilarating as being shot at and missed" --Winston Churchill
 
TedTAce
Posts: 9098
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 12:31 am

RE: Space Shuttle Return To Flight May 15. Too Early?

Thu Apr 07, 2005 10:49 am

Quoting SATL382G (Reply 22):
Has NASA TV ever covered the entire rollout to the pad before as they did today? Dry viewing yes, but never having seen the whole procedure....

This is an excellent question. I didn't realize NTV was for 'real' until I moved up here not more then a month after Columbia met it's fate. I'll pay close attention to this 'next time' if possible.
This space intentionally left blank

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Mortyman and 6 guests