md90fan
Posts: 2798
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 11:15 am

MiG-29/Su-27 Question

Sun Jan 01, 2006 4:25 am

What formely western aircraft air forces have swithced over to CIS equipment? Malaysia,Indonesia, India, any more? same goes for CIS helicopters too
http://www.devanwells.blogspot.com/
 
LY744
Posts: 5185
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 11:55 pm

RE: MiG-29/Su-27 Question

Sun Jan 01, 2006 5:03 am

Any number of middle eastern nations... the change happened in the 50's and 60's albeit. Then again, it would describe most users of Soviet/Eastern equipment.  Silly

A more recent convertee that springs to mind is Iran (late 70's).


LY744.
Pacifism only works if EVERYBODY practices it
 
md90fan
Posts: 2798
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 11:15 am

RE: MiG-29/Su-27 Question

Sun Jan 01, 2006 5:14 am

Quoting LY744 (Reply 1):
Any number of middle eastern nations... the change happened in the 50's and 60's albeit. Then again, it would describe most users of Soviet/Eastern equipment.

A more recent convertee that springs to mind is Iran (late 70's).

Ok thanks does the new CIS Chopper Mil-38 have potential?

http://www.kazanhelicopters.com/eng/helicopters/mi38
http://www.devanwells.blogspot.com/
 
MigFan
Posts: 710
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 12:50 am

RE: MiG-29/Su-27 Question

Sun Jan 29, 2006 2:06 am

Mil helicopters have a large application in numerous areas. They are affordable, and quite proven. CIA is currently using Mi-17s in Iraq & Afghanistan. Some Canadian logging companies have acquired some examples for use in North America. The main reason why former communist nations are discarding their old equipment is age and cost of maintenance. The MTB for the engine overhaul on an RD-33 is 500 hours! There are two of these items in a Mig-29/33! The GE-PW-110 can go 1000-1500 hours.
India went for the Su-30 for two main reasons. One, it rocks! Two, The US would not provide India with the technology transfer required to license build the aircraft.
Malaysia's woes with their F/A-18Ds probably prompted them to go for the Mig-29 out spite! That choice does reflect sound financial judgement in my opinion. Great as it is, the Mig-29 is a costly aircraft to operate.
UH-60's suck!!!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: youpitof and 7 guests