RichardPrice
Topic Author
Posts: 4474
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 5:12 am

Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Fri Jul 21, 2006 7:14 pm

Due to MD's complaints, the EADS light utility helicopter deal won earlier this year has been suspended pending an investigation by Congress.

http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles...er+contract%2c+as+US+congress.html
 
bennett123
Posts: 7462
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 12:49 am

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Fri Jul 21, 2006 8:12 pm

There seems little point in doing more work on these aircraft until Congress decides if they are going to buy them.
 
MigFan
Posts: 710
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 12:50 am

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Fri Jul 21, 2006 8:35 pm

There's a shocker... Politics at work...

I think the UH-145 is just a better aircraft than the MDHI Explorer.

/M
UH-60's suck!!!
 
Lumberton
Posts: 4176
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:34 am

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Fri Jul 21, 2006 10:44 pm

As I noted on the other thread a moment ago, I can see this deal possibly being re-bid. If there are discrepancies in the bid evaluation, the U.S. Army will take it's lumps and re-announce. There will likely be a political firestorm if it doesn't. I always thought the timing of this announcement--late Friday before a major U.S. holiday, when the Congress was out of town--very, very curious.
"When all is said and done, more will be said than done".
 
AirRyan
Posts: 2398
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 9:57 am

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Sat Jul 22, 2006 12:42 am

What a bunch of political garbage - the first aircraft is already under construction and is due to be delivered this fall. Since when can the Army not decide given a certain budget what helicopter they want to buy? The MD helo was completely out of the running as they wanted nothing to do with NOTAR and it's smaller cabin; if anything Bell may have had a beef but still, they couldn't (or wasn't willing to) match the price EADS came in with the UH-145. MD's offer just never interesed the US Army for what they intended to use it for.

The only sham here is MD helicopters - I never had much to opine about them one way or the other, but this is bullsh!t and reeks of sour grapes. Who do these morons think they are? This may be the land of litigation, but you just don't sue to sell your product - people will pay more to buy the other guys product after that kind of escapade. I'm sure the Army is just giddy and apologetic just waiting to reverse their order for MD helicopters, instead. Like the report says, they even seriously doubted that the bid would send the company too far into the red ultimately raising fears that they wouldn't even be able to stay in business long enough to finish the contract.

I believe the EADS deal has some fairly powerful politicians in its district, so I wouldn't expect them to go down without a fight. WhereTF was the GAO when it came to the V-22 program?!

If the GAO says re-bid and no EADS this time, the Army will surely trump MD and just go with Bell - you can't force the Army to buy something that it does not want and whining this loud about it, MD just won't get the Army's money.

[Edited 2006-07-21 17:57:13]
 
User avatar
N328KF
Posts: 5810
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 3:50 am

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Sat Jul 22, 2006 2:06 am

Huh. This is contrary to the initial statements by MD Helicopters...that they were accepting of the outcome.
When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' -Theodore Roosevelt
 
User avatar
USAF336TFS
Posts: 1356
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 11:05 pm

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Sat Jul 22, 2006 4:28 am

Contrary to some comments here, and with all due respect, MD Helicopters has made some complelling arguments for their offering. This deal did go down very quickly and, as some pointed out, the timing of the announcement was very curious. It took a few years for the US-101 to win the Presidential Transport competition and the Air Force is taking it's time on the winner for the CSAR-X competition - Next year - if I've read correctly.

All three offerings should be carefuly considered and it looks like this thing is by no means over yet. As far as the ones they've built already... I'm sure they can be sold or donated, should EADS lose the rematch.
336th Tactical Fighter Squadron, 4th Fighter Wing, Seymour Johnson AFB
 
RichardPrice
Topic Author
Posts: 4474
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 5:12 am

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Sat Jul 22, 2006 4:33 am

Quoting USAF336TFS (Reply 6):
It took a few years for the US-101 to win the Presidential Transport competition

To be fair, that was for 23 heavy lift helicopters, while this deal was for 8 light utility helicopters - a totally different magnitude of money.
 
RAPCON
Posts: 651
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 7:20 am

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Sat Jul 22, 2006 4:54 am

Quoting Migfan (Reply 2):
There's a shocker... Politics at work...

I think the UH-145 is just a better aircraft than the MDHI Explorer.

Serious politics at work here!!! MD is behaving like the whinners at EADS.

That little rinky-dinky MD chopper is not even in the same club as the UH-145. Although IMHO, the EADS product is junk compared to a 60 which should've been the product chosen. It's already in service and it eases training & operational headaches.
MODS CAN'T STOP ME....THEY CAN ONLY HOPE TO CONTAIN ME!!!
 
Boeing Nut
Posts: 5078
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2001 2:42 am

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Sun Jul 23, 2006 12:12 am

Quoting RichardPrice (Thread starter):
Due to MD's complaints, the EADS light utility helicopter deal won earlier this year has been suspended pending an investigation by Congress.

Truly, truly unbelieveable.

I guess the new rule of thumb now after losing a contract is to do this.............


 hissyfit   hissyfit   hissyfit   hissyfit   hissyfit   hissyfit   hissyfit   hissyfit   hissyfit   hissyfit   hissyfit   hissyfit   hissyfit   hissyfit 
I'm not a real aeronautical engineer, I just play one on Airliners.net.
 
MigFan
Posts: 710
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 12:50 am

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Sun Jul 23, 2006 12:38 am

Quoting Boeing Nut (Reply 9):
I guess the new rule of thumb now after losing a contract is to do this.............

Can't win... sue




Quoting RAPCON (Reply 8):
compared to a 60 which should've been the product chosen. It's already in service and it eases training & operational headaches.

Perhaps the US Army wanted a light utility helicopter instead?

/M
UH-60's suck!!!
 
Thorny
Posts: 1508
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:44 am

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Sun Jul 23, 2006 12:41 am

Quoting RichardPrice (Reply 7):
To be fair, that was for 23 heavy lift helicopters, while this deal was for 8 light utility helicopters - a totally different magnitude of money.

Huh? The US Army is buying 322 LUHs...

http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/...ter-in-us-defense-market/index.php

[Edited 2006-07-22 17:42:22]
 
RichardPrice
Topic Author
Posts: 4474
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 5:12 am

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Sun Jul 23, 2006 1:23 am

Quoting Thorny (Reply 11):
Huh? The US Army is buying 322 LUHs...

D'oh, the article I was reading didnt make it clear the 16 were for early delivery.

I find it highly amusing that FG say that MDs protest include the fact that the contract is 'going to a foreign conglomerate' - simple abuse of patriotism for commercial gain.

[Edited 2006-07-22 18:26:16]
 
RAPCON
Posts: 651
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 7:20 am

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Sun Jul 23, 2006 2:21 am

Quoting MigFan (Reply 10):
Perhaps the US Army wanted a light utility helicopter instead?

If they want light, go with the 58. If they want to help the Guard/Reserve with their job, give'em a 60.
MODS CAN'T STOP ME....THEY CAN ONLY HOPE TO CONTAIN ME!!!
 
art
Posts: 2680
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:46 am

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Sun Jul 23, 2006 3:51 am

Quoting RAPCON (Reply 13):
Quoting MigFan (Reply 10):
Perhaps the US Army wanted a light utility helicopter instead?

If they want light, go with the 58. If they want to help the Guard/Reserve with their job, give'em a 60.

What's wrong with giving them what they want?
 
RAPCON
Posts: 651
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 7:20 am

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Sun Jul 23, 2006 6:08 am

Quoting Art (Reply 14):
What's wrong with giving them what they want?

Let me quote the Rolling Stones: "....you can't always get what you want!"  drunk 
MODS CAN'T STOP ME....THEY CAN ONLY HOPE TO CONTAIN ME!!!
 
art
Posts: 2680
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:46 am

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Sun Jul 23, 2006 10:43 am

Quoting Lumberton (Reply 3):
As I noted on the other thread a moment ago, I can see this deal possibly being re-bid. If there are discrepancies in the bid evaluation, the U.S. Army will take it's lumps and re-announce. There will likely be a political firestorm if it doesn't. I always thought the timing of this announcement--late Friday before a major U.S. holiday, when the Congress was out of town--very, very curious.

This smacks of democracies where if the electorate elects the "wrong" party, the results are suspended or the election is re-run to give the electorate another chance to choose the "right" party.
 
Devilfish
Posts: 5263
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 7:52 am

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Sun Jul 23, 2006 12:39 pm

Quoting RAPCON (Reply 8):

Serious politics at work here!!! MD is behaving like the whinners at EADS.



Quoting RichardPrice (Reply 12):
simple abuse of patriotism for commercial gain.

Shades of the contemplated EADS action regarding the Canadian C-17 deal? But it does seem "contrived."
"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
 
User avatar
par13del
Posts: 6692
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:14 pm

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Tue Jul 25, 2006 2:05 am

Before this thread becomes a bash, I think we should just take it as congress doing business as usual, and what goes around comes around. This one at present seems to be working against EADS, the previous one - tanker deal - worked for EADS, think we just need to let this play out.
 
MigFan
Posts: 710
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 12:50 am

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Tue Jul 25, 2006 3:08 am

Quoting RAPCON (Reply 13):
If they want light, go with the 58. If they want to help the Guard/Reserve with their job, give'em a 60.

I can't get onboard with either type. The OH-58 was only good enough as a trainer, and heavily modified as a scout/FAC machine. I don't think it has the flexibility that the UH-145 can offer. So what if the UH-145 is a foreign design.

The UH-60 was much more of a maintenance pain, than it's predecessor (UH-1). The two types are far from comparible, but one did succeed the other.

/M
UH-60's suck!!!
 
User avatar
kc135topboom
Posts: 11007
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 2:26 am

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Tue Jul 25, 2006 4:37 am

Quoting DEVILFISH (Reply 17):
Shades of the contemplated EADS action regarding the Canadian C-17 deal?

Or the Airbus action after the AI deal to buy Boeing airliners.
 
dl021
Posts: 10836
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:04 pm

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Tue Jul 25, 2006 5:12 am

I'm unsurprised by this development. It seems that the process now includes challenges and lawsuits. If there was any impropriety then I'll be pissed. If there wasn't and this was simply the losing company trying to use the courts to stave off financial challenges then I'm going to be pissed.

Quoting AirRyan (Reply 4):
The MD helo was completely out of the running as they wanted nothing to do with NOTAR and it's smaller cabin;

I don't think that either of those two issues were the main thing the Army was looking at. The MD helo is the right size and NOTAR is not a particular challenge for anyone. It appears that this contract went down to price, and EADS provided the product desired for the lowest price.

Quoting RAPCON (Reply 8):
That little rinky-dinky MD chopper is not even in the same club as the UH-145.

Yes, it is. The two helos are apparently evenly matched on capability (with both having advantages over each other) and as I said it was money.

Quoting RAPCON (Reply 8):
Although IMHO, the EADS product is junk compared to a 60 which should've been the product chosen. It's already in service and it eases training & operational headaches.

The EADS product is an extraordinairily high quality product that has been meeting just this need for years. It started out as an MBB product, and if you ever wanted to see it at work look at the skies overhead for every third air ambulance, or at old tapes of the South African Air Force rescue helos during the Mozambique flooding where they winched thousands to safety. They are excellent birds and just right for what they are going to be called upon to do for the USA. Light utility.

Quoting RichardPrice (Reply 12):
I find it highly amusing that FG say that MDs protest include the fact that the contract is 'going to a foreign conglomerate' - simple abuse of patriotism for commercial gain.

Well, at least they're being open about it. Plenty of companies do that behind the scenes on both sides of the pond. How do you think the Rafale got built?

Quoting RAPCON (Reply 13):
If they want light, go with the 58. If they want to help the Guard/Reserve with their job, give'em a 60.

OH-58 is too light for the job. 60 is too much.

Quoting DEVILFISH (Reply 17):
Shades of the contemplated EADS action regarding the Canadian C-17 deal? But it does seem "contrived."

Yeah, it should make it hard for EADS to complain about MDD's reaction.

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 20):
Quoting DEVILFISH (Reply 17):
Shades of the contemplated EADS action regarding the Canadian C-17 deal?

Or the Airbus action after the AI deal to buy Boeing airliners.

So should this.
Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
 
RAPCON
Posts: 651
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 7:20 am

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Tue Jul 25, 2006 5:15 am

Quoting DEVILFISH (Reply 17):
Shades of the contemplated EADS action regarding the Canadian C-17 deal?

Not even in the same ball park. The EADS helo suspension smacks of politics and MD not admitting that they can't compete. There is no doubt that EADS will deliver the product advertised--after all, it's already in operations in many countries in both civ and mil jobs.

The Canadian went with the C-17 because the EADS could not put fwd anything that's flying. All EADS has is a drawing, and an ugly one at that. The A400M is way behind the original schedule, has now been delayed even more, and there is still a lot of doubt as to whether it will perform as advertised, and whether or not the Euro nations will actually purchase it. The C-17 is here, today. I'm sure the Canadians flew the hell out of it, kicked the tires, talked to the crews, and figured out that if it was good enough for the USAF/RAAF/RAF, the doggone it, it was good enough for them. Nuff said!
MODS CAN'T STOP ME....THEY CAN ONLY HOPE TO CONTAIN ME!!!
 
flynlr
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 4:12 pm

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Fri Jul 28, 2006 6:39 pm

Quoting Migfan (Reply 19):
The UH-60 was much more of a maintenance pain, than it's predecessor (UH-1). The two types are far from comparible, but one did succeed the other.

have to disagree as both a uh-60 and UH-1 Crewchief. the 60 was a dream compared to the old ass UH-1 course this was back in the 80's I love em both though.
The Right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
 
UH60FtRucker
Posts: 3252
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:15 am

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:44 am

Quoting RAPCON (Reply 13):
If they want light, go with the 58. If they want to help the Guard/Reserve with their job, give'em a 60.

Huh? I don't think you understand the whole concept behind the LUH. It was specifically intended to purchase a civilian helicopter with proven reliability. As it currently stands we're using old OH-58Cs and UH-1s to conduct stateside medivac, boarder patrol, local police assist, staff transport, etc... and because of maintenance issues, we have gaps in the coverage... so they fill it with UH-60s. And the Army HATES that. That is one -60 that could otherwise be over here in Iraq fighting the war.

The Army does NOT want a combat geared helicopter. It wants a helicopter to specifically cover stateside rotary wing aircraft demand. It's a very smart move. It's much cheaper and it's mission specialized.

Quoting RAPCON (Reply 15):
Let me quote the Rolling Stones: "....you can't always get what you want!"

That's my point, the Army DID get what they wanted.

Quoting Migfan (Reply 19):
The OH-58 was only good enough as a trainer, and heavily modified as a scout/FAC machine.

WHAT? What are you basing that on? I flew the Charlie model and it was 10x better than the TH-67 (trainer model). The helicopter is unbelievably reliable and under a competent pilot can be very deadly. The newer Delta models are heavily used over here in Iraq. Far more than the Apaches and are tied in much more closely with the ground troops than the Apache. It's a fantastic helicopter that has proven itself time and time again. So much so that it's replacement - the RAH-70 - is a modified Bell 407.

Quoting Migfan (Reply 19):
The UH-60 was much more of a maintenance pain,

Sorry, but the 'hawk is very maintenance friendly. From it's design it was intended on being so.

Compared to the Marines UH-1s, we have far higher operational readiness levels in Iraq and we have far less maintenance man hours required for every hour of flight.

-UH60
Your men have to follow your orders. They don't have to go to your funeral.
 
RAPCON
Posts: 651
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 7:20 am

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:08 pm

Quoting UH60FtRucker (Reply 24):
That's my point, the Army DID get what they wanted.

...and my point is that regardles of the Army's wants, in the end it's up to Congress and since it's ultimately their call....."you can't always get what you want"
MODS CAN'T STOP ME....THEY CAN ONLY HOPE TO CONTAIN ME!!!
 
UH60FtRucker
Posts: 3252
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:15 am

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Wed Aug 02, 2006 2:20 am

Quoting RAPCON (Reply 25):
...and my point is that regardles of the Army's wants, in the end it's up to Congress and since it's ultimately their call....."you can't always get what you want"

But that still does not make sense. Even if congress chooses to replace the stateside OH-58C and UH-1s with the MDExplorer, and not the Eurocopter, at least we're still in the ballpark of what the Army wants! Replacing them with more UH-60s, as you suggest here:

Quoting RAPCON (Reply 8):
compared to a 60 which should've been the product chosen.



Quoting RAPCON (Reply 13):
If they want to help the Guard/Reserve with their job, give'em a 60.

is foolish! We don't WANT more UH-60s. They're completely inappropriate for the job we're looking to fill. Where it's the MDExplorer or Eurocopter, the Army will basically get what it wants.

-UH60
Your men have to follow your orders. They don't have to go to your funeral.
 
Lumberton
Posts: 4176
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:34 am

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Wed Oct 25, 2006 7:12 pm

Looks like the protests have been "cleared" and this deal is back on track.
http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/061024/arms_eads_helicopter.html?.v=1

Quote:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - French-German defense contractor EADS (Paris:EAD.PA - News) has been cleared to resume work on a U.S. Army light helicopter contract now that the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) rejected protests from other bidders, an EADS spokesman told Reuters on Tuesday.
"When all is said and done, more will be said than done".
 
columba
Posts: 5045
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 10:12 pm

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Wed Oct 25, 2006 9:09 pm

At least some good news for EADS.
It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
 
CV990A
Posts: 1389
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 1999 6:04 am

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Wed Oct 25, 2006 10:36 pm

Quoting RichardPrice (Reply 12):
the contract is 'going to a foreign conglomerate' - simple abuse of patriotism for commercial gain.



Quoting DL021 (Reply 21):
Well, at least they're being open about it.

In the FPDS-NG reporting system, when the government awards and reports a contract, one of the 'required' fields is a field named 'Country of Incorporation' so, if the contract is awarded to a foreign company, it must be reported as such- theoretically, at least, since to make the new system work, they had to remove the fail-safes, so that the GS-3 idiots puting the data into the system can leave required fields blank.  Angry But, needless to say, this fact shoudn't be a surprise to anyone involved in the decision-making process...
Kittens Give Morbo Gas
 
Devilfish
Posts: 5263
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 7:52 am

RE: Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended

Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:29 am

Quoting Columba (Reply 28):
At least some good news for EADS.

Yes, a welcome relief and reason to be happy. Flightglobal also confirms the news.....

http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles...liver+after+LUH+protests+fail.html
"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: snowmann and 10 guests