747400sp
Topic Author
Posts: 3833
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 7:27 pm

Info On The F-15N

Tue Apr 24, 2007 8:10 am

I read that the USN has done study on a Navy version of the F-15 called the F-15N. As a some what Fan of the F-15, I was curius about how a carrier version of the F-15 looks. I know it had to have, a twin wheel nose gear and a strouger main gear. Also it had to have a different wing. If anybody has any info on the F-15N, please post it? thank you.
 
ebj1248650
Posts: 1517
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 6:17 am

RE: Info On The F-15N

Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:55 am

Quoting 747400sp (Thread starter):
I read that the USN has done study on a Navy version of the F-15 called the F-15N. As a some what Fan of the F-15, I was curius about how a carrier version of the F-15 looks. I know it had to have, a twin wheel nose gear and a strouger main gear. Also it had to have a different wing. If anybody has any info on the F-15N, please post it? thank you.

The F-15N may be akin to the F-16N in terms of what the Navy wants it to do. The F-16N is an aggressor airplane built specifically for the Navy and used exclusively in that role. I have a feeling what the Navy is looking for is an airplane about the size of the larger Sukhois (SU-27, etc.) so that their pilots can get some experience fighting a jet fighter with that kind of size and performance. With F-15Cs becoming available (apparently) as the F-22 comes on line, it might not be too hard for the Navy to get enough of them to outfit at least one new Aggressor squadron. Just my thoughts.
Dare to dream; dream big!
 
agill
Posts: 939
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 4:49 am

RE: Info On The F-15N

Tue Apr 24, 2007 4:59 pm

I didn't think it would be possible to convert an aircraft for carrier use. Doesn't that need some serious rebuilding if the frame?
 
Oroka
Posts: 1072
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 4:37 am

RE: Info On The F-15N

Tue Apr 24, 2007 7:09 pm

Why not just buy a few SU-30s from somewhere
 
CV990A
Posts: 1385
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 1999 6:04 am

RE: Info On The F-15N

Thu Apr 26, 2007 1:26 am

Quoting Oroka (Reply 3):
Why not just buy a few SU-30s from somewhere

Venezuela?  duck 

What's wrong with using the older F/A-18C/Ds as larger aggressor aircraft? Buying a specialized F-15 for this role doesn't make much sense, especially with all the 'success' they had with the F-16N.
Kittens Give Morbo Gas
 
ebj1248650
Posts: 1517
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 6:17 am

RE: Info On The F-15N

Thu Apr 26, 2007 1:42 am

Quoting CV990A (Reply 4):
What's wrong with using the older F/A-18C/Ds as larger aggressor aircraft? Buying a specialized F-15 for this role doesn't make much sense, especially with all the 'success' they had with the F-16N.

The Navy is already using Hornets as Aggressors. I would have thought they might consider using the Tomcat if they wanted a big fighter to simulate the Sukhoi jets, but the Tomcat doesn't have the F-15's performance. Too, I don't believe the Hornet can simulate the big Sukhoi in terms of size or performance. Makes sense the Navy would want the Eagle for a proper aggressor aircraft if they can get it. Wouldn't operate from carriers, obviously, but may need some modifications to meet the Navy's specific needs.
Dare to dream; dream big!
 
747400sp
Topic Author
Posts: 3833
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 7:27 pm

RE: Info On The F-15N

Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:00 am

Quoting EBJ1248650 (Reply 1):
The F-15N may be akin to the F-16N in terms of what the Navy wants it to do.

No. This was a carrier base plane.
 
ebj1248650
Posts: 1517
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 6:17 am

RE: Info On The F-15N

Thu Apr 26, 2007 6:30 am

Quoting 747400sp (Reply 6):
No. This was a carrier base plane.

Are you talking about the navalized F-15 that McDonnell Douglas offered the Navy about the time the Tomcat was still fairly new? Would have featured Phoenix missile armament but as I recall the additional weight would have so badly taken away from the Eagle's stellar performance the Navy declined development.
Dare to dream; dream big!
 
Oroka
Posts: 1072
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 4:37 am

RE: Info On The F-15N

Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:12 am

What about the SU-33? That was a Navalized version of the SU-27. Did it suffer any significant performance hit from the conversion? Maybe we could get an idea of how the F-15 would fair in a navalization.
 
LMP737
Posts: 4800
Joined: Wed May 08, 2002 4:06 pm

RE: Info On The F-15N

Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:39 pm

Quoting EBJ1248650 (Reply 7):
Are you talking about the navalized F-15 that McDonnell Douglas offered the Navy about the time the Tomcat was still fairly new? Would have featured Phoenix missile armament but as I recall the additional weight would have so badly taken away from the Eagle's stellar performance the Navy declined development.

From what little info is out there about the F-15N it seems it had more to do with capital hill politics. Also even if they had put the Phoenix on the F-15 as a single seater the pilot would have had a serious case of overload.
Never take financial advice from co-workers.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: GST and 6 guests