WINGS
Topic Author
Posts: 2312
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 1:36 am

Airbus A400M - No Room For Mistakes.

Tue Jun 12, 2007 3:50 am

No room for mistakes with the Airbus A400M



http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...istakes-with-the-airbus-a400m.html

Airbus Military is upbeat after a difficult six months in the life of its A400M, but will Europe's giant airlifter keep its flight schedule?

While Airbus's flagship A380 will dominate the skies at Le Bourget this year, the company's first dedicated military transport aircraft - the A400M - will be maintaining a much lower profile, as the project battles to avoid the development woes that have previously afflicted its commercial stablemate.

Launched in May 2003 with the signature of a 180-aircraft development and production contract by Europe's OCCAR procurement agency acting on behalf of seven partner nations, the A400M is publicly declared as being on track to achieve its first flight in the first quarter of 2008, albeit later than a previous goal of next January. But with the project's aggressive timescale leaving little room for error, Airbus Military is assessing the possible implications of two setbacks that have affected its development activities over the last six months.


Definately worth the read.  Smile

Regards,
Wings
Aviation Is A Passion.
 
dl021
Posts: 10836
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:04 pm

RE: Airbus A400M - No Room For Mistakes.

Tue Jun 12, 2007 4:14 am

This airplane is on track to be another Transall if they aren't careful. It's got real potential to be a very good tactical airlifter with some strategic implications (except that it's a bit big and costly to drop in the mud very often, and many operators will treat this as a strategic asset instead of a tactical one).

I'd like to see it in the air sooner rather than later as if it fails then the nations needing the lift will have very little room to turn other than asking Boeing to reopen the C-17 line or taking a huge chance on the AN-70X....
Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
 
keesje
Posts: 8747
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2001 2:08 am

RE: Airbus A400M - No Room For Mistakes.

Tue Jun 12, 2007 4:49 pm

The H-130J´s probably won´t replace the large numbers of old Herc´s around, C-17 production will be ended soon & the A400s & C-27J´s will be circling around the Pentagon for future transport requirements to pop up.

Odd there will not be a US tactical transport build in US for the foreseable future but Lockheed selling improved versions of the 50 year old Hercules.
"Never mistake motion for action." Ernest Hemingway
 
Dougloid
Posts: 7248
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 2:44 am

RE: Airbus A400M - No Room For Mistakes.

Tue Jun 12, 2007 11:01 pm

Quoting Keesje (Reply 2):
the A400s & C-27J´s will be circling around the Pentagon for future transport requirements to pop up.

Don't hold your breath.
If you believe in coincidence, you haven't looked close enough-Joe Leaphorn
 
keesje
Posts: 8747
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2001 2:08 am

RE: Airbus A400M - No Room For Mistakes.

Thu Jun 14, 2007 3:35 am

Quoting Dougloid (Reply 3):
Don't hold your breath.

No one should ever hold their breath on any military projct these days..
"Never mistake motion for action." Ernest Hemingway
 
User avatar
solnabo
Posts: 5015
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:53 am

RE: Airbus A400M - No Room For Mistakes.

Thu Jun 14, 2007 3:50 am

Quoting Keesje (Reply 4):
No one should ever hold their breath on any military projct these days

 checkmark 

Micke//
Airbus SAS - Love them both
 
krisyyz
Posts: 1266
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2004 11:04 pm

RE: Airbus A400M - No Room For Mistakes.

Thu Jun 14, 2007 4:21 am

Is Airbus still pissed over the Canadian decision favouring the C-130J? I think DND has already made some sort of deal with Lockheed thereby excluding the A400M. Canada should have looked at a split order of C-130js and some A400M as the A400M could have been a great SAR/smaller tactical airlift aircraft for the forces.

KrisYYZ
 
PADSpot
Posts: 1637
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 11:31 pm

RE: Airbus A400M - No Room For Mistakes.

Thu Jun 14, 2007 4:30 am

Quoting KrisYYZ (Reply 6):
Canada should have looked at a split order of C-130js and some A400M as the A400M could have been a great SAR/smaller tactical airlift aircraft for the forces.

Three types (C-17,C-130J and A400M) with maybe 30 frames in the fleet? I don't think you can communicate that very well ... would be a nice gesture though.
 
krisyyz
Posts: 1266
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2004 11:04 pm

RE: Airbus A400M - No Room For Mistakes.

Thu Jun 14, 2007 4:47 am

Quoting PADSpot (Reply 7):
Three types (C-17,C-130J and A400M) with maybe 30 frames in the fleet? I don't think you can communicate that very well ... would be a nice gesture though.

The A400M would have been a great asset to the CAF, but Canada needs new tactical airlift aircraft ASAP and Airbus couldn't meet the delivery schedule set by DND. Canada still may look at the A400M in the future as the current C130J proposal will only replace 15 or so out of the 32 C-130s Canada operates.

KrisYYZ
 
Dougloid
Posts: 7248
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 2:44 am

RE: Airbus A400M - No Room For Mistakes.

Thu Jun 14, 2007 5:17 am

Quoting KrisYYZ (Reply 8):
he A400M would have been a great asset to the CAF, but Canada needs new tactical airlift aircraft ASAP and Airbus couldn't meet the delivery schedule set by DND. Canada still may look at the A400M in the future as the current C130J proposal will only replace 15 or so out of the 32 C-130s Canada operates.

Not if anyone at Pratt & Whitney Canada has anything to say about it.
If you believe in coincidence, you haven't looked close enough-Joe Leaphorn

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests