Lumberton
Topic Author
Posts: 4176
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:34 am

Politicos Want More F-22s

Fri Nov 09, 2007 8:34 pm

Pardon my skepticism, but this reads like a pre-arranged "drama".
http://www.reuters.com/article/marke...54009320071109?rpc=44&pageNumber=1

U.S. senators demand Pentagon release F-22 reports

Quote:
Six U.S. senators on Friday demanded Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England release three government-funded reports that call for additional purchases of Lockheed Martin Corp (LMT.N: Quote, Profile, Research) F-22 "Raptor" fighter jets beyond the currently planned level of 183.

The senators said they were concerned by the recent grounding of the Air Force's 700-plus fleet of Boeing Co (BA.N: Quote, Profile, Research) F-15s, India's recent decision to join Russia's effort to develop a new fighter jet, and the Air Force's statements that it really needs 381 F-22s, although it can only afford 183.

"We continue to be perplexed by the Department of Defense's insistence that only 183 F-22As should be procured," the senators wrote in the letter, which was obtained by Reuters.

They asked England to let Congress examine in full three separate reports that reportedly concluded that a far greater number of F-22s was needed, and to make public the reports' conclusions about the minimum number of F-22s needed.

The fix is in?

[Edited 2007-11-09 12:35:13]
"When all is said and done, more will be said than done".
 
UH60FtRucker
Posts: 3252
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:15 am

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Fri Nov 09, 2007 8:40 pm

Quoting Lumberton (Thread starter):

The fix is in?

Do any of us really think the Air Force is going to stop at 183? It seems more likely that we'll go well over 300 when it's all said and done.

Who knows, this might be like the C-17 program. Lockheed will say they are going to be forced to shut the line down, the Air Force will say they don't have the money to buy more... so Congress steps in and provides additional funding, thus relieving the Air Force from having to buy the aircraft out of their annual budget.

I hope that doesn't happen though. It would make more fiscal sense in the long run to admit we're going to buy 300-400 aircraft, and also allow it to be sold to Israel and Japan... thus lowering the project costs and saving the taxpayers some money. Afterall, money is not in huge abundance these days for the Air Force.

-UH60
Your men have to follow your orders. They don't have to go to your funeral.
 
MCIGuy
Posts: 1445
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 8:15 am

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Fri Nov 09, 2007 9:35 pm

I've said all along that the Raptor won't shut down any time soon. The costs to reopen the line once it's closed or worse, develop of and all-new frame are too high. The USAF will get 400 Raptors, or even more.
I'm against foreign sales at this point, epecially to Israel. I'd hate to see Raptor tech end up in Chinese or Russian hands just for a quick buck. I take issue with a few of the "partners" in the F-35 program as well.  Wink
Airliners.net Moderator Team
 
PADSpot
Posts: 1637
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 11:31 pm

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Fri Nov 09, 2007 9:38 pm

Quoting UH60FtRucker (Reply 1):
Lockheed will say they are going to be forced to shut the line down, the Air Force will say they don't have the money to buy more

I always found that logic a bit strange, at least from my perspective. If something is finished the line gets shut down, this is more normal than not.

Quoting UH60FtRucker (Reply 1):
Do any of us really think the Air Force is going to stop at 183? It seems more likely that we'll go well over 300 when it's all said and done. [...] It would make more fiscal sense in the long run to admit we're going to buy 300-400 aircraft

What would be the overall price per frame (all costs divided by all aircrafts produced) if they stopped at 183 and what if they got all the 381 they want? Or is that one of the questions I better do not ask?  duck 
 
MCIGuy
Posts: 1445
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 8:15 am

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Fri Nov 09, 2007 9:41 pm

Quoting PADSpot (Reply 3):
What would be the overall price per frame (all costs divided by all aircrafts produced) if they stopped at 183 and what if they got all the 381 they want? Or is that one of the questions I better do not ask?

Around $90M a frame.  Smile
Airliners.net Moderator Team
 
PADSpot
Posts: 1637
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 11:31 pm

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Fri Nov 09, 2007 10:12 pm

Quoting MCIGuy (Reply 4):
Around $90M a frame.

I don't know whether you refer to 183 aircrafts or 381, but I generally doubt that figure. If you really include all costs (unit price+system+development costs) you'll end up in solid three-digit amounts of United states dollars. The sheer unit price (the naked, unfuelled aircraft!) may be 90M$.
 
User avatar
kc135topboom
Posts: 11007
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 2:26 am

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Fri Nov 09, 2007 11:24 pm

Quoting MCIGuy (Reply 2):
The USAF will get 400 Raptors, or even more.
I'm against foreign sales at this point, epecially to Israel.

Near 400 F-22s (not counting any FB-22 versions) is about right for the USAF. But it should also go the FMS route, being sold to Israel, Japan, and Australia. Sell it to the UK, too if they want/need it.

Quoting PADSpot (Reply 5):
I don't know whether you refer to 183 aircrafts or 381, but I generally doubt that figure. If you really include all costs (unit price+system+development costs) you'll end up in solid three-digit amounts of United states dollars. The sheer unit price (the naked, unfuelled aircraft!) may be 90M$.

On a USAF sale of 381 F-22s the unit costs, including all R&D costs will be $148M US. A unit fly away cost, not counting R&D is around $90M US.
 
wvsuperhornet
Posts: 517
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 4:18 pm

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Sat Nov 10, 2007 4:03 am

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 6):
Near 400 F-22s (not counting any FB-22 versions) is about right for the USAF. But it should also go the FMS route, being sold to Israel, Japan, and Australia. Sell it to the UK, too if they want/need it.

the FB-22 version is no longer an issue it was discarded last year when the airforce decided the money would be better spent in a long range bomber (and I agree with them) due to the troubles in afganistan of aquiring any close regional airbases. I agree with selling it or at least offering it to Australia and Japan and even the UK although the UK funds are tied up into the Euro-fighter it would be very unlikely they would have the money or even want the F-22. Israel has been too loose with our secrets to China I am not in favor of selling it or even offering it to them. Back to the original post, I do agree that we will need more than 183 F-22's I like the 400 figure myself but feel it will be around 350 by the time they are done. If the pentagon and politicians were smart (I really use that term loosley) they would buy 350 F-22's and supplement the replacement of the rest of the F-15's with the new F-18 e/f since the aircraft is as capable and more in some aspects only lacking slightly on range but with mid air refueling thats not really a large issue. It would be really cost effective since the F-18 e/f is already in full scale production and with being able to get rid of the extra items needed to land on a carrier like the F-18c's did with out it, they would have some increase in preformance. Just my opinion but glad to see at least someone is waking up.
 
PADSpot
Posts: 1637
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 11:31 pm

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Sat Nov 10, 2007 8:23 am

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 6):
On a USAF sale of 381 F-22s the unit costs, including all R&D costs will be $148M US. A unit fly away cost, not counting R&D is around $90M US.

So I calculate (148M$*381pcs)-(381pcs-183pcs)*90M$)/183pcs = 210M$ a piece when only 183 are ordered?
 
F27Friendship
Posts: 1098
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:45 pm

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Sat Nov 10, 2007 10:01 am

Quoting UH60FtRucker (Reply 1):
and also allow it to be sold to Israel and Japan... thus lowering the project costs and saving the taxpayers some money.

I'm pretty sure Isreal will get them and won't pay a cent for it themselves, hence you (the US taxpayer) are paying for it.

Quoting MCIGuy (Reply 4):
Around $90M a frame.

that's rather optimistic I'd say Big grin
 
ebj1248650
Posts: 1517
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 6:17 am

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Sat Nov 10, 2007 3:32 pm

Quoting Lumberton (Thread starter):
Pardon my skepticism, but this reads like a pre-arranged "drama".

Not so much pre-arranged as an opportunity jumped on. The F-15 grounding is significant and F-22 proponents are taking full advantage of it. Anything else they can find to add fuel to their fire is a plus. There's little doubt in my mind that more F-22s are coming. And I don't see the Air Force getting all excited about quoting low prices to repair the F-15s. If they do anything they'll clamor at the opportunity to state the needed repairs aren't cost effective, at least as it applies to the older C and D model F-15s.
Dare to dream; dream big!
 
FlagshipAZ
Posts: 3192
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2001 12:40 am

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Sat Nov 10, 2007 4:35 pm

Thru a reliable source, the USAF will receive at least 244 F-22s, altho 183 are "officially" funded. Don't worry about the F-22 production run being shut down prematurely...the aircraft is simply too good to pass up this soon in it's service life. Definitely more are on the way.
On a sidenote regarding the C-17...the USAF will get 200, even tho 190 are, again "officially" funded. However, once the RAF, RAAF & the RCAF gets their C-17s, this production line may be shut down for good, unless there are more orders soon.
Regards.
"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." --Ben Franklin
 
PADSpot
Posts: 1637
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 11:31 pm

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Sat Nov 10, 2007 5:14 pm

Quoting F27Friendship (Reply 9):
I'm pretty sure Isreal will get them and won't pay a cent for it themselves, hence you (the US taxpayer) are paying for it.

I wonder if anyone has spent some time on actually REASSESSING the general defense situation of Israel in recent years. The extent of arms and money provisions from the US to Israel has barely changed since the really hot times in the late 60s, 70s and early 80s. Now Israel lives at peace with most of its neighboring governments. They only thing they have to cope with is the general insurgency and Syria. I'd argue that they could handle that on their economic power. It's not like 30 years ago when they were at war with five neighboring countries at the same time. And I mean it's not only the US pouring money into the Israeli military ...

Quoting MCIGuy (Reply 2):
I'm against foreign sales at this point, epecially to Israel. I'd hate to see Raptor tech end up in Chinese or Russian hands just for a quick buck.

Now I am curious on how you see it going from Israel to Russia or China? Israel is not known for being a notorious technology leaker ... I would worry more about F-16 Block 50 sales to Pakistan.

Quoting MCIGuy (Reply 2):
I take issue with a few of the "partners" in the F-35 program as well.

Which? AFAIK they are all members of NATO and should count as your closest allies.
 
ebj1248650
Posts: 1517
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 6:17 am

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Sat Nov 10, 2007 5:56 pm

Quoting FlagshipAZ (Reply 11):
Thru a reliable source, the USAF will receive at least 244 F-22s, altho 183 are "officially" funded.

Even 244 isn't enough.
Dare to dream; dream big!
 
Acheron
Posts: 1835
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 1:14 am

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Sat Nov 10, 2007 6:28 pm

Quoting PADSpot (Reply 12):
Now I am curious on how you see it going from Israel to Russia or China? Israel is not known for being a notorious technology leaker ..

The whole Lavi/J-10 deal. Several classified american items went to China during the sale.
 
GDB
Posts: 12653
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 6:25 pm

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Sat Nov 10, 2007 6:54 pm

No chance the UK will ever buy F-22.
Typhoon gets, (still incredibly) a lot of flak for 'being a Cold War' aircraft, only good for dogfighting.
Until they drop their first bomb on a Taliban target next year, though these claims probably won't even stop then.
Really, the only good PR it's got recently was an appearance on Top Gear and some help from the Russian AF!

So consider trying to buy something that will be seen in the same light, never mind if it's not fair comment, only much more expensive and not even doing anything for local industry-not that this factor plays all that much here, most unlike in the US.
F-22 is just too much aircraft for the RAF, too few could ever be procured, with very hard choices elsewhere to pay for it.
Quite honestly, it's not needed.

The RAF's manned types post 2020 are set in stone, Typhoon and F-35B. It will be a struggle to get all the numbers the RAF want of them, though half the F-35B's will be with the RN.
As Elmer Fudd once said, 'that's all folks!'
 
F27Friendship
Posts: 1098
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:45 pm

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Sun Nov 11, 2007 12:22 am

Quoting PADSpot (Reply 12):
I wonder if anyone has spent some time on actually REASSESSING the general defense situation of Israel in recent years. The extent of arms and money provisions from the US to Israel has barely changed since the really hot times in the late 60s, 70s and early 80s. Now Israel lives at peace with most of its neighboring governments. They only thing they have to cope with is the general insurgency and Syria. I'd argue that they could handle that on their economic power. It's not like 30 years ago when they were at war with five neighboring countries at the same time. And I mean it's not only the US pouring money into the Israeli military ...

I don't think Isreal's security sitation, which is rather allright at the momen as you pointed out, has anything to do with it. If the Isreali's want it, the'll get it, as there's no American politician brave enough to risk loosing the Jewish vote.
 
GDB
Posts: 12653
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 6:25 pm

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Sun Nov 11, 2007 12:53 am

I do think the 'Jewish Vote' in the US, influencing policy towards Israel, is somewhat overrated.
It's not a huge block, many tend to vote Democrat.
Policy varies too, the first George Bush had a difficult personal relationship with Shamir, however this and the robust stance generally, did not lessen US influence, rather at the most important time it enhanced it, preventing Israel from destroying the 1991 coalition against Iraq, by understandably retaliating to the extreme provocation of the SCUD attacks.

That era had seen US pressure when Israel was seriously acting against US policy, it was this stance, that I think enabled Bush and his team to prevent disaster in 1991.
The more carte blanche attitude now, coupled with the incompetence of the current US administration, means the US probably has less influence thea under the current President's father.

It is really, the more fundamentalist Christian influence in the US, that helps to drive the current stance.
This is a newer aspect, the US will always be highly supportive of Israel, but the degree of this has changed, to more ideological and less pragmatic perhaps.
 
F27Friendship
Posts: 1098
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:45 pm

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Sun Nov 11, 2007 1:05 am

either way, there is enough pressure from lobbyist with Jewish background that have a lot of influence in places that will make sure they get what they want for free.
 
wvsuperhornet
Posts: 517
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 4:18 pm

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Sun Nov 11, 2007 7:02 am

Quoting PADSpot (Reply 12):
Now I am curious on how you see it going from Israel to Russia or China? Israel is not known for being a notorious technology leaker ... I would worry more about F-16 Block 50 sales to Pakistan.

The J-10 was developed off a F-16 that came from Pakistan. The technical knowledge and american avaionics knowledge were given to China from Israel. The f-16 block 50's being sold to Pakistan are probably no more advanaced or if they are its by very little than the J-10 china already has. The damage has already been done so why not sell pakistan the block 50's. So yes Israel while considered an ally has sold US technology before. I doubt the US taxpayer would be in support of letting Israel have the F-22 especially when our airforce is flying 20 plus year old aircraft. Also Israel has a very good and dominant airforce now in the region with their F-15I and F-16I, they will probably receive some F-35's in the future but realistic fact is they really dont have any challengers to their airforce and probably wont have for some time. I know where my vote would go and it would be a big "No" to Israel having access to the F-22.
 
fumanchewd
Posts: 2878
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 7:43 am

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Sun Nov 11, 2007 8:05 am

Quoting PADSpot (Reply 12):
Now Israel lives at peace with most of its neighboring governments. They only thing they have to cope with is the general insurgency and Syria.

It isn't necessarily just about protecting Israel. Although it isn't granite, Israel is a stable extended ally of America in a region of instability. Syria and Iran are still seen as allies of Russia and the cold war continues in that regard.

Secondarily, in the eyes of this US administration and Israel, the Iran situation (whether you agree or not) calls for a state of readiness.

Israel certainly has less enemies, but a few are merely waiting for the right opportunity.
In the time of chimpanzees, I was a monkey...
 
F27Friendship
Posts: 1098
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:45 pm

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:16 am

Quoting Fumanchewd (Reply 20):
Syria and Iran are still seen as allies of Russia and the cold war continues in that regard.

where did this come from?!
 
PADSpot
Posts: 1637
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 11:31 pm

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:23 am

Quoting Wvsuperhornet (Reply 19):
I know where my vote would go and it would be a big "No" to Israel having access to the F-22.

If was a US taxpayer my consideration would be more about the money poured into the Israeli military than the type of technology.

Quoting Fumanchewd (Reply 20):
the Iran situation (whether you agree or not) calls for a state of readiness.

#

Agreed, although it may not call for some sort conventional readiness, but more about strategic deterrent capability, which Israel already has and, which I think, is ineffective and counterproductive in this case. Because IF Iran seeks nuclear weapons then BECAUSE Israel has them. It's a political problem and that's why they can only be a political solution. Any sort of military action would lead to a more severe counter reaction, more hatred, more bloodshed, more insanity and less peace. So no option. Finally the core problem there is that one side does not accept the other as dialog partner. This is not about power, hegemonic ambitions, access to resources or whatever ...
 
fumanchewd
Posts: 2878
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 7:43 am

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Sun Nov 11, 2007 4:23 pm

Quoting F27Friendship (Reply 21):
Quoting Fumanchewd (Reply 20):
Syria and Iran are still seen as allies of Russia and the cold war continues in that regard.

where did this come from?!

Russia still has weapons sales and political interests in both. Russia supplies much of Iran's means to acquire nuclear power/weapons. The US continues the polarity in Israel. It hasn't changed in over 50 years. Its just that the "communism" label is gone. These are the same players as Suez minus Egypt plus Iran.

"Spheres of influence" as they say.
In the time of chimpanzees, I was a monkey...
 
Oroka
Posts: 1077
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 4:37 am

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Mon Nov 12, 2007 6:01 am

Quoting Wvsuperhornet (Reply 19):
The J-10 was developed off a F-16 that came from Pakistan.

The J-10 was developed from the Lavi, which was based on the F-16. The J-10 is the Lavi airframe and Russian engine and electronics.



As for the F-22, I think that once the main production run has completed, a large number of bare airframes (no engines, no electronics) should be built and stored. If the need be, those frames can be completed, or modified into something that is needed (say FB-22). The F-22 is the silver bullet for the USAF, but I sure would want to have more on tap just in case.
 
User avatar
Zkpilot
Posts: 3714
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:21 pm

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Mon Nov 12, 2007 6:31 am

Quoting Oroka (Reply 24):
As for the F-22, I think that once the main production run has completed, a large number of bare airframes (no engines, no electronics) should be built and stored. If the need be, those frames can be completed, or modified into something that is needed (say FB-22). The F-22 is the silver bullet for the USAF, but I sure would want to have more on tap just in case.

Thats actually a very good idea if they don't keep the production line open up to say 350-400 aircraft. If they only make 300 then building an extra 100 bare frames would be quite useful.
56 types. 38 countries. 24 airlines.
 
echster
Posts: 393
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 4:01 pm

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Mon Nov 12, 2007 7:52 pm

I've seen Barry McCaffrey, former NATO commander and Presidential candidate, come out and say in 15 years we'll be falling behind China. He is advocating roughly 350 x F-22s and, without hijacking this thread by going into details, 600 x C-17s. Yes, 600 x C-17s. He is also advocating other command and control ideas/items but nothing worth adding here.

IMHO, if Clinton gets the nomination and wins the White House, it's conceivable he'll land the SecDef job.
 
F27Friendship
Posts: 1098
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:45 pm

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Mon Nov 12, 2007 7:54 pm

Quoting Fumanchewd (Reply 23):
Russia still has weapons sales and political interests in both. Russia supplies much of Iran's means to acquire nuclear power/weapons. The US continues the polarity in Israel. It hasn't changed in over 50 years. Its just that the "communism" label is gone. These are the same players as Suez minus Egypt plus Iran.

"Spheres of influence" as they say.

that's something totally different than the cold war still going on. Russia and the US aren't supplying these to get to each other.
 
checksixx
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:39 pm

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Mon Nov 12, 2007 8:43 pm

I think a big problem in this thread is that many of you don't know what 'production line' means. What LMAero is talking about right now is the shutdown of long lead time items from subcontractor's. I can further assure you that with no orders firm past 183 right now...even though someone above thinks different...that they most definately will start to close down those long lead vendors. If any of you worked on the 15 C/D's, you'd understand why we need more Raptors.
 
halls120
Posts: 8724
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 3:24 am

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:40 pm

Quoting Echster (Reply 26):
IMHO, if Clinton gets the nomination and wins the White House, it's conceivable he'll land the SecDef job.

That will never happen.

Unless, of course, Ms. Clinton wants a democratic version of Rumsfeld.
"Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." Mark Twain, a Biography
 
texl1649
Posts: 348
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:38 am

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:07 pm

Quoting Zkpilot (Reply 25):
Quoting Oroka (Reply 24):
As for the F-22, I think that once the main production run has completed, a large number of bare airframes (no engines, no electronics) should be built and stored. If the need be, those frames can be completed, or modified into something that is needed (say FB-22). The F-22 is the silver bullet for the USAF, but I sure would want to have more on tap just in case.

Thats actually a very good idea if they don't keep the production line open up to say 350-400 aircraft. If they only make 300 then building an extra 100 bare frames would be quite useful.

This isn't new, it's politics. Producing an extra hundred bare frames is antithetical to the decision-makers who would approve such a move.

Step 1: Campaign donations/politics/real military needs induce Congress to approve massive military R&D program.
Step 2: Congress objects to development costs/pricetag increases, so they cut procurement numbers to 1/4 of overall original plan at then grossly increased unit-costs (with over-runs, and R&D spread over fewer units).
Step 3: Congress questions why so few are procured. Campaign donations/lobbyists second bite at the apple.
Step 4: Upgrades/remanufacture/third tier Procurements: Lobbyists third bite at the apple.
Step 5: Major new variant floated; Fourth bite at the apple (FB-22 probably will get a serious look in the 2010-2015 timeframe).
Step 6: See step 1.

Threaten the folks at the top of this food chain, and you will be made to publicly look like the next Darlene Druyun (but you might actually be innocent.)
 
User avatar
kc135topboom
Posts: 11007
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 2:26 am

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Wed Nov 14, 2007 6:32 pm



Quoting TexL1649 (Reply 30):
Step 1: Campaign donations/politics/real military needs induce Congress to approve massive military R&D program.
Step 2: Congress objects to development costs/pricetag increases, so they cut procurement numbers to 1/4 of overall original plan at then grossly increased unit-costs (with over-runs, and R&D spread over fewer units).
Step 3: Congress questions why so few are procured. Campaign donations/lobbyists second bite at the apple.
Step 4: Upgrades/remanufacture/third tier Procurements: Lobbyists third bite at the apple.
Step 5: Major new variant floated; Fourth bite at the apple (FB-22 probably will get a serious look in the 2010-2015 timeframe).
Step 6: See step 1.

That's a pretty accurate summery.
 
michlis
Posts: 696
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 8:13 am

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Wed Nov 14, 2007 6:37 pm



Quoting F27Friendship (Reply 27):
that's something totally different than the cold war still going on. Russia and the US aren't supplying these to get to each other.

Are you sure about that?
If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the outcome of a hundred battles.
 
F27Friendship
Posts: 1098
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:45 pm

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Wed Nov 14, 2007 6:47 pm



Quoting Michlis (Reply 32):
Are you sure about that?

I'd see they are competitors in some way, but nothing like the cold war by any means.
 
PADSpot
Posts: 1637
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 11:31 pm

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:46 pm



Quoting Echster (Reply 26):
've seen Barry McCaffrey, former NATO commander and Presidential candidate, come out and say in 15 years we'll be falling behind China.

Given they have more than four times the amount of brain and manpower (in economic terms) and a non-democratic system which has less difficulties devoting anything between 5 and 10% of its GDP to the military, one doesn't need to be an expert to come to that conclusion. F-22s won't change that development in the long run, neither will C-17s ...
 
Lumberton
Topic Author
Posts: 4176
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:34 am

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Wed Nov 14, 2007 10:55 pm

Quoting PADSpot (Reply 34):
Given they have more than four times the amount of brain and manpower (in economic terms) and a non-democratic system which has less difficulties devoting anything between 5 and 10% of its GDP to the military, one doesn't need to be an expert to come to that conclusion. F-22s won't change that development in the long run, neither will C-17s ...

With all due respect, people were saying similar things in the '70s about the U.S. & the Soviet Union. Remember Kissinger's famous "Sparta & Athens" comparison? Lots of things can happen in 20 years....

[Edited 2007-11-14 14:56:24]
"When all is said and done, more will be said than done".
 
PADSpot
Posts: 1637
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 11:31 pm

RE: Politicos Want More F-22s

Wed Nov 14, 2007 11:49 pm



Quoting Lumberton (Reply 35):
With all due respect, people were saying similar things in the '70s about the U.S. & the Soviet Union. Remember Kissinger's famous "Sparta & Athens" comparison?

Well, but China's potential of just outgrowing its rivaling super powers are much more immanent than those of the Soviet Union in the seventies. It was clear from the beginning that a pure communist system cannot keep up with free market economy and they had about the same size of population as the US (not counting Europe, which had to be added in a cold war type of scenario).

Quoting Lumberton (Reply 35):
Lots of things can happen in 20 years....

Ok, but if we stick with that, we can stop making projections right away and forever.

It's very dangerous to use pass over the actual issue just by assuming that things may chnag in a few years. It is a likely development which could become decisive for us all (the US and the EU as the today's two largest economic areas) and that is better tackled as early as possible. And think it is not primarily a military issue. Its a multi-faceted and very comprehensive issue. And when I think about it, I think not that much about the amount of fighter jets or transport planes, but about the amount of mainland-Chinese students at my old university for instance. Every second engineering student was Chinese when I was there. Should we help making them that strong? I mean what are the implications of educating their later professors for instance? In a civil sense these are tremendous force multipliers. At another junction my father works as a civil servant at a county land register. Since ten year they have had Chinese interns that learn about how to organize private land. Meanwhile China has adapted entire German laws, I mean directly by just translating them. This is becoming weird. The sole recipe seems to be "Who is particularly good at something? Go there. Learn it. Implement the same at home. (Copy it)". And all that with the giant lever of 1,3Bil people with rapidly growing educational standard. This is not be underestimated, but it is also not a primarily military issue.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests