jamincan
Posts: 572
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 9:28 am

Replacement For CF-18

Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:41 pm

Sorry if this has been covered, I did a search, but didn't really find anything on the subject.

I'm curious if the Canadian Forces has plans to replace the CF-18 in the future. I know that Canada has invested some money in the F-35 program; however, it seems that there isn't a commitment in place yet. Are they likely to proceed with the F-35, and is it most suitable for their needs, or is there a better platform?
 
MCIGuy
Posts: 1445
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 8:15 am

RE: Replacement For CF-18

Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:02 pm



Quoting Jamincan (Thread starter):
or is there a better platform?

Yeah, the F-22, but we aren't selling right now. I see CA's participation in F-35 going ahead.
Airliners.net Moderator Team
 
CF188A
Posts: 680
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 12:27 am

RE: Replacement For CF-18

Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:36 pm

The topic has not come up for a few years now:

To start, Canada has invested in the F-35 program because it will indeed be their next tactical fighter. I would love to think Eurofighters, or something of the sort but it is unlikely. I understand Canada has always been fond of duel powerplant fighters(minus the F-104, Sabre, etc), especially in present days when we are not aggressors. That second GE has saved MANY CF-18s from being written off therefore I think the Eurofighter given it's unparalleled capabilities would be the best replacement for the CF. In today's world of politics, who knows what Canada will have in their fleet 12 years from now. Keep in mind the F-15 modernization projects as well... etc etc. But as it stands right now in 2008, the F-35 is the aircraft of choice.

Quoting MCIGuy (Reply 1):
Yeah, the F-22, but we aren't selling right now. I see CA's participation in F-35 going ahead.

I think most Canadian AF enthusiasts/pilots would love to see F-22s with the CF markings, however this is unrealistic and NEVER going to happen. Way to much money and the aircraft itself has no use for the Canadian mission. If perhaps Canada and the United States became involved with a full scale war , then yes , I would say its possible, however this is highly unlikely.

Canada plans to keep the CF-18s in service until at least 2020. The 2.1 Billion dollar CF-18 modernization project is nearly complete, I believe there are still a few more fighters in their final stages. Read the following links for details on the upgrades.

http://www.dnd.ca/site/Newsroom/view_news_e.asp?id=1602

http://www.sfu.ca/casr/id-cf18-3-1.htm

[Edited 2008-01-31 13:38:46]
Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die tomorrow~ RIP ... LJFM
 
Ozair
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:38 am

RE: Replacement For CF-18

Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:00 pm



Quoting CF188A (Reply 2):
Canada plans to keep the CF-18s in service until at least 2020. The 2.1 Billion dollar CF-18 modernization project is nearly complete, I believe there are still a few more fighters in their final stages. Read the following links for details on the upgrades.

I was thinking about the Aussie F-18s the other day and I guess the Canadian ones fall into the same basket. Considering the respective aircraft were built for carrier ops, eg: stronger structures, do you think the respective upgrades each service is undertaking will take them out to the timeline wanted?

I know there are some people in defence in Oz that have issues with centre barrel replacement. Seems with the recent F-15 groundings structural upgrades may not be the correct course of action.
 
YSJguy
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 12:37 am

RE: Replacement For CF-18

Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:06 pm

I've just been thinking about is myself for a couple days myself. I think a twin engine would be better for the CAF. The EF-2000 was first on my mind but what about the Rafale? I don't hear a whole lot about them. Are they any good?
 
CF188A
Posts: 680
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 12:27 am

RE: Replacement For CF-18

Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:46 pm



Quoting Ozair (Reply 3):
do you think the respective upgrades each service is undertaking will take them out to the timeline wanted?

To my knowledge lots of of the CF-18s are pushing their limits when it comes to their structures and G-Limits. But until the wings begin snapping we will not see any major changes in the coming years.
Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die tomorrow~ RIP ... LJFM
 
connies4ever
Posts: 3393
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:54 pm

RE: Replacement For CF-18

Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:13 am



Quoting CF188A (Reply 2):
That second GE has saved MANY CF-18s from being written off therefore I think the Eurofighter given it's unparalleled capabilities would be the best replacement for the CF. In today's world of politics, who knows what Canada will have in their fleet 12 years from now

I agree re two engines, especially for longer overwater or Arctic patrol flights. Tranche 3 Eurofighters would include a full air-to-ground capability IIRC, a top-notch dogfighter for knife fights, and very good BVR capabilities.

Against the Eurofighter would be it's cost -- although with exchange rates and so forth, who really knows? But to my knowledge it is currently in the same ballpark as the F-35.

For the Eurofighter is the fact that it is a _known_ quantity as it is in service, whilst the F-35 is still rather an _unknown_ quantity.

There is also the mooted Super Super Hornet.

FWIW, I'd go Euro ...
Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
 
jutes85
Posts: 1854
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 12:50 pm

RE: Replacement For CF-18

Fri Feb 01, 2008 2:14 am

The more I think about it, the better choice the EuroFighter would be for Canada. I believe the price between the Eurofighter and F-35 are pretty much the same except the EF has already proven itself. Being twin-engined also helps for the large distances between airfields in Canada. The only thing I can see a problem with the EF is the part supply chain and how it would work. I don't think that waiting 2 weeks for a avionics box or something is acceptable.

[Edited 2008-01-31 18:16:57]
nothing
 
MissedApproach
Posts: 678
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:12 am

RE: Replacement For CF-18

Fri Feb 01, 2008 2:39 am

I read an article about a year ago that said industry insiders consider the JSF a lock for Canada.

Quoting CF188A (Reply 2):
That second GE has saved MANY CF-18s from being written

True, but consider also that while a second engine increases safety, it doesn't double it. It also addds a lot to the cost, both in purchase & maintenance. While a single engine airplane may suffer more losses due to engine failure, the reduced purchase & support costs may make it more affordable overall. So long as it doesn't increase pilot losses (our real limiting factor), I don't have anything against a single engined airplane.

Quoting CF188A (Reply 2):
F-22s with the CF markings, however this is unrealistic and NEVER going to happen.

Under normal circumstances this would never happen. Given the several high profile purchases of late (C-17, C-130J), it's really impossible now.

I would like to see a two pronged approach myself. I like the Eurofighter as well, something with those capabilities would be good in the domestic role. The STOVL variant of the F-35 would be great to support our operations overseas, a role the current fighter community has been curiously absent from. On the other hand, when the F-35B goes to the USMC, imagine how cheap those AV-8B's will be!
Can you hear me now?
 
SP90
Posts: 351
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 12:39 am

RE: Replacement For CF-18

Thu May 01, 2008 12:35 am

Just out of curiosity are there any structural or avionics differences between the CF-18A/Bs and the USN's F/A-18A/Bs? I spot what looks like a fake canopy painted on the bottom but is there anything significant that might disqualify the CF-18 from carrier operations?
 
CYQL
Posts: 80
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:19 pm

RE: Replacement For CF-18

Thu May 01, 2008 12:56 am



Quoting SP90 (Reply 9):
Just out of curiosity are there any structural or avionics differences between the CF-18A/Bs and the USN's F/A-18A/Bs? I spot what looks like a fake canopy painted on the bottom but is there anything significant that might disqualify the CF-18 from carrier operations?

If I remember correctly, the main difference is the addition of a spotlight on the left side, below the cockpit for nightime intercepts. I don't believe there is any structural reason that would prevent a carrier landing. I am not sure if the electronics fit is the same as the US Navy.
 
HanginOut
Posts: 521
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 3:24 am

RE: Replacement For CF-18

Thu May 01, 2008 12:35 pm



Quoting CYQL (Reply 10):
Quoting SP90 (Reply 9):
Just out of curiosity are there any structural or avionics differences between the CF-18A/Bs and the USN's F/A-18A/Bs? I spot what looks like a fake canopy painted on the bottom but is there anything significant that might disqualify the CF-18 from carrier operations?

If I remember correctly, the main difference is the addition of a spotlight on the left side, below the cockpit for nightime intercepts. I don't believe there is any structural reason that would prevent a carrier landing. I am not sure if the electronics fit is the same as the US Navy.

Even if the CF-18 is capable of landing on an American aircraft carrier, the question would be: how do you get it off the carrier, as there is no way you could hook it up to the catapult launch system. You'd have to wait until the carrier hit port and then probably have to lift it off with a crane.
Dreaming of the day I can work for an airline
 
MissedApproach
Posts: 678
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:12 am

RE: Replacement For CF-18

Thu May 01, 2008 10:20 pm



Quoting HanginOut (Reply 11):
there is no way you could hook it up to the catapult launch system.

Sure there is- there's a launch bar on the nose gear, just like every USN F/A-18.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Alex Christie

Can you hear me now?
 
Oroka
Posts: 1077
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 4:37 am

RE: Replacement For CF-18

Fri May 02, 2008 6:22 pm

Other than some minor details (formation lights and spot light), everything is (well, as delivered), the same as the USN Hornets. There was a de-navalized version proposed called the F-18L for export, but all the export customers prefered the beefy naval version.
 
HanginOut
Posts: 521
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 3:24 am

RE: Replacement For CF-18

Fri May 02, 2008 7:15 pm



Quoting MissedApproach (Reply 12):
Sure there is- there's a launch bar on the nose gear, just like every USN F/A-18.

I, humbly, stand corrected. Thanks, now I'm going to go mention this to the "Moron" of an Air Force Officer who told me that "there is no way one of our Hornets could take off from a USN carrier".  footinmouth 
Dreaming of the day I can work for an airline
 
curlyheadboy
Posts: 814
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 6:56 am

RE: Replacement For CF-18

Fri May 02, 2008 7:58 pm



Quoting HanginOut (Reply 14):
I, humbly, stand corrected. Thanks, now I'm going to go mention this to the "Moron" of an Air Force Officer who told me that "there is no way one of our Hornets could take off from a USN carrier".

Maybe he wanted to say that they don't have all the required equipment to safely conduct carrier OPS. While they kept some features designed for aircraft carrier use on their hornets (landing gear, arrest hook, fold-able wings) this doesn't necessarily mean they can fly from carriers, I think they don't have the automatic carrier landing system, and in my knowledge they don't even train their pilots for carrier operations.
If God had wanted men to fly he would have given them more money...
 
MissedApproach
Posts: 678
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:12 am

RE: Replacement For CF-18

Fri May 02, 2008 8:42 pm



Quoting HanginOut (Reply 14):
I, humbly, stand corrected.

Don't sweat it, I'm not out to step on anybody, just pointing out my observations.  Wink

Quoting CURLYHEADBOY (Reply 15):
I think they don't have the automatic carrier landing system,

You are in fact correct, the Navy standard ACLS was replaced with a land-based ILS system.
http://www.rcaf.com/aircraft/fighters/hornet/index.php
http://home.att.net/~jbaugher4/f18_12.html

Quoting CURLYHEADBOY (Reply 15):
they don't even train their pilots for carrier operations.

As a rule no, but I know for a fact at least one CF pilot has landed on a US carrier. I haven't been able to find the info I'm looking for on the web, so I'm not sure if it was with one of our planes- more likely he was on an exchange tour with the USMC or USN at the time.
Can you hear me now?
 
AF340
Posts: 2267
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 7:57 am

RE: Replacement For CF-18

Fri May 02, 2008 9:01 pm

Very wierd, I was just thinking about this today...


I would think due to the involvement with the F-35 program, that is the next one.

Quoting CF188A (Reply 2):
I would love to think Eurofighters, or something of the sort but it is unlikely.

That would be awesome. Never going to happen though....




Liam spin 
 
HanginOut
Posts: 521
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 3:24 am

RE: Replacement For CF-18

Sat May 03, 2008 6:21 am



Quoting AF340 (Reply 17):
Quoting CF188A (Reply 2):
I would love to think Eurofighters, or something of the sort but it is unlikely.

That would be awesome. Never going to happen though....

I agree, the Eurofighter would probably be better for us, but (and I'm going to sound like a broken record here) it's never going to happen. But we can dream can't we.  pray 
Dreaming of the day I can work for an airline
 
AF340
Posts: 2267
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 7:57 am

RE: Replacement For CF-18

Sat May 03, 2008 6:26 pm



Quoting HanginOut (Reply 18):
But we can dream can't we.

Yes. Yes we can.  Smile




Liam spin 
 
CYQL
Posts: 80
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:19 pm

RE: Replacement For CF-18

Sun May 04, 2008 6:02 am

http://www.forces.gc.ca/admmat/dgiip/jsf_e.asp

"The CF is currently interested in either the CTOL or CV version."

I was surprised by the CF interest in the carrier version of the F-35. But after doing some reading on the subject, it makes a lot of sense with the larger wing and increased fuel capacity, which means greater range.
 
Oroka
Posts: 1077
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 4:37 am

RE: Replacement For CF-18

Sun May 04, 2008 6:38 am



Quoting CYQL (Reply 20):
it makes a lot of sense with the larger wing and increased fuel capacity, which means greater range.

Also for the beefed up airframe and landing gear. We generally operate our fighters out of some rugged areas, a tougher aircraft would be a must. Cold Lake in the Winter (even the summer) can get quite nasty. Then there are those extreem northern soverignity deployments. Not the nicest places.
 
wvsuperhornet
Posts: 517
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 4:18 pm

RE: Replacement For CF-18

Sun May 04, 2008 9:26 am



Quoting CF188A (Reply 2):
Eurofighter given it's unparalleled capabilities would be the best replacement for the CF. In today's world of politics, who knows what Canada will have in their fleet 12 years from now. Keep in mind the F-15 modernization projects as well... etc etc. But as it stands right now in 2008, the F-35 is the aircraft of choice.

Ummmm what Unparalleled capabilities does the euro-fighter have? Its not stealth, it doesn't supercruise with weapons, and has a limited air to ground capability..So whats so unparalleled about it?
 
Alien
Posts: 416
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:00 am

RE: Replacement For CF-18

Sun May 04, 2008 2:06 pm



Quoting Wvsuperhornet (Reply 22):
So whats so unparalleled about it?

The level of hype and marketing propaganda BAE, EADS and other in Europe are spewing about it.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: GST and 8 guests