User avatar
moo
Posts: 4033
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 2:27 am

First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:06 pm

Today EADS rolled out the first structurally complete A400M from the Final Assembly Line in Seville, Spain:

Big version: Width: 913 Height: 532 File size: 113kb


I must admit, it looks a lot better in real life than it did in the mock ups!

http://eads.com/1024/en/pressdb/pres.../20080626_eads_a400m_roll-out.html
 
keesje
Posts: 8610
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2001 2:08 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:20 pm

Cut out. A $20 billion program..

http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z160/keesje_pics/A400M-2.jpg
"Never mistake motion for action." Ernest Hemingway
 
F27Friendship
Posts: 1098
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:45 pm

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:33 pm

it looks pretty!

can't wait for the first flight
 
keesje
Posts: 8610
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2001 2:08 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:40 pm

For folks that wants some more perspective / detail..

http://www.flightglobal.com/airspace...airbus-military-a400m-roll-out.jpg
"Never mistake motion for action." Ernest Hemingway
 
User avatar
Francoflier
Posts: 3691
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2001 12:27 pm

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:45 pm

This picture gives a good idea of the scale of that thing.

Check out the size of the prop...

I'll do my own airline. With Blackjack. And hookers. In fact, forget the airline.
 
NoUFO
Posts: 7397
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2001 7:40 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:48 pm

And another one:

http://www.spiegel.de/img/0,1020,1224897,00.jpg
I support the right to arm bears
 
User avatar
autothrust
Posts: 1455
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 8:54 pm

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 2:03 pm

Looks fantastic, so much better then the Herc. Hope it will fly soon and get more orders. Well done Airbus.
“Faliure is not an option.”
 
User avatar
N328KF
Posts: 5807
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 3:50 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 2:03 pm

Anyone know of scaled drawings that show it in comparison to other airlifters?
When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' -Theodore Roosevelt
 
User avatar
autothrust
Posts: 1455
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 8:54 pm

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 2:06 pm



Quoting N328KF (Reply 7):
Anyone know of scaled drawings that show it in comparison to other airlifters?

Hope this helps:
“Faliure is not an option.”
 
DeltaGuy
Posts: 3965
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2001 5:25 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 2:13 pm

The nose looks like a C-141

The tail looks like a C-17

The rest looks like a C-130

DeltaGuy
"The cockpit, what is it?" "It's the little room in the front of the plane where the pilot sits, but that's not importan
 
keesje
Posts: 8610
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2001 2:08 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 2:22 pm

Hat throwing event



Quoting DeltaGuy (Reply 9):
The rest looks like a C-130

Yeah absolutely  laughing 
"Never mistake motion for action." Ernest Hemingway
 
columba
Posts: 5043
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 10:12 pm

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:32 pm

Congratulations to the folks at Airbus another milestone achieved. Finally and long awaited.
Hope it gets in the air soon it is desperately needed with the European Air Forces much more important as new fighters and attack helicopters.

Quoting AutoThrust (Reply 6):
Looks fantastic, so much better then the Herc.

Nah, no military transporter will ever look better as the Herc just as no fighter will ever look better as the F 104 and F 105  Smile

Quoting DeltaGuy (Reply 9):
The nose looks like a C-141

Now as you say it !!
It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
 
GST
Posts: 808
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 10:27 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:53 pm

Do those props on the same wing spin in opposite directions? What would be the benefit of that?

whatever, it looks cool though.
 
BlueSky1976
Posts: 1605
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 9:18 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 4:05 pm



Quoting DeltaGuy (Reply 9):
The nose looks like a C-141

Correct.

Quoting DeltaGuy (Reply 9):
The tail looks like a C-17

Correct.

Quoting DeltaGuy (Reply 9):
The rest looks like a C-130

Incorrect. The rest looks like An-70. Herc doesn't have swept-back wings.
POLAND IS UNDER DICTATORSHIP. PLEASE SUPPORT COMMITTEE FOR DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACY, K.O.D.
 
MCIGuy
Posts: 1445
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 8:15 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:17 pm

Congrats Airbus, a nice looking airplane! Now get it in the air.  Silly
Airliners.net Moderator Team
 
Nicoeddf
Posts: 509
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:13 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:26 pm



Quoting DeltaGuy (Reply 9):
The nose looks like a C-141

The tail looks like a C-17

The rest looks like a C-130

Its because Airbus didn't know how to build a military airlifter. So they just copied superior US airlifter design.
 
2H4
Posts: 7960
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:11 pm

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:47 pm



Quoting GST (Reply 12):
Do those props on the same wing spin in opposite directions? What would be the benefit of that?

You'll find your answer here.  Smile

2H4
Intentionally Left Blank
 
SlamClick
Posts: 9576
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 7:09 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 7:02 pm



Quoting DeltaGuy (Reply 9):
The nose looks like a C-141

The tail looks like a C-17

The rest looks like a C-130

Yep.
I was just thinking it looked like they had hired that great Russian designer T. M. Reguspatov
(TM Reg. US Pat. Off.)

I'm sure it is, from keel to truck an entirely original design taking advantage of every advance in airplane design since the C130 was lofted but the superficial resemblance will prevail. Some opine that the only reason DHC went to a t-tail for the Dash-8 was so no one would mistake it for an F-27.
Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
 
GST
Posts: 808
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 10:27 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 7:13 pm



Quoting 2H4 (Reply 16):
You'll find your answer here. Smile

Yeah I found that about 30 mins after posting here, silly me  Smile

Thanks though

Quoting SlamClick (Reply 17):
Some opine that the only reason DHC went to a t-tail for the Dash-8 was so no one would mistake it for an F-27.

Complete hogwash .  Wink
 
User avatar
SAS A340
Posts: 713
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2000 5:59 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 7:26 pm

Lovely airplane,hopefully Sweden replace some of the Herc's to a couple of these beauties  bigthumbsup 
It's not what u do,it's how u do it!
 
bustin
Posts: 316
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 5:11 pm

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 7:36 pm

Hi:

I was there. ¡¡¡¡44 º c. Horrible!!!!

Regards

Bustin
Big version: Width: 1460 Height: 985 File size: 534kb
Big version: Width: 1405 Height: 949 File size: 422kb
 
keesje
Posts: 8610
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2001 2:08 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:01 pm



Quoting Bustin (Reply 20):
Hi:

I was there. ¡¡¡¡44 º c. Horrible!!!!

Congratulations & thnx for the pictures!

I was there when the engines were still misssing, I think they form the heart of its unique capabilities.
"Never mistake motion for action." Ernest Hemingway
 
User avatar
Mortyman
Posts: 4084
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 8:26 pm

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:35 pm

 
r2rho
Posts: 2439
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:13 pm

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:56 pm

I'll never get tired of saying it: I LOVE those props!
 
keesje
Posts: 8610
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2001 2:08 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:49 pm

You can see the props tips point forward in reverse position, a result of the scimitar blade shape.
"Never mistake motion for action." Ernest Hemingway
 
Asturias
Posts: 1953
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 5:32 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:12 pm

Wow it is beautiful. ..

Fff 44 degrees eh? I prefer the north of Spain thank you!  Smile

asturias
Tonight we fly
 
2H4
Posts: 7960
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:11 pm

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:18 pm

I can only imagine the rate of descent that could be achieved with those props in flat pitch...

2H4
Intentionally Left Blank
 
User avatar
kc135topboom
Posts: 10997
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 2:26 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Fri Jun 27, 2008 12:10 am

Does it have anything inside it, or is it a shell, like the first A-380 was? Is it still overweight?
 
Asturias
Posts: 1953
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 5:32 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Fri Jun 27, 2008 12:27 am



Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 27):
Does it have anything inside it, or is it a shell, like the first A-380 was? Is it still overweight?

Yes, no, no, no.

asturias
Tonight we fly
 
andhen
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 9:32 pm

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Fri Jun 27, 2008 12:49 am



Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 27):
Does it have anything inside it, or is it a shell, like the first A-380 was? Is it still overweight?

I think you should start by saying CONGRATULATIONS to the plane and the workers who build it before you start to inquisit (I don't know how that word is written, sorry..) it!!

I, for shure have been no fan of the 787 or the boeing company, but I know that I will congratulate you, boeing and all others here on the forum after the first flight..!!

I'm sorry for coming so hard down on you, but I guess you understand my point here..?

Congrats to the a400, beautiful, and very important plane!!

andhen
a332/3, 773-ER
 
dl021
Posts: 10836
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:04 pm

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Fri Jun 27, 2008 1:41 am

well, congratulations to the folks in Seville who have rolled that airplane out. It's a terrific looking airplane and I'm certain they can be very proud of their work.

Now...is it still overweight? I know Boeing's having the same problems with weight after rollout (and why wouldnt you be a fan of Boeing or the 787?...we're airplane geeks here...we like airplanes and ones that offer significant advancements are always good) and they're still working on it even now with power on.

I wonder how important the plane is going to be in terms of actual orders? It will certainly be rather expensive, but I'd like to see the US order some. They'd fill a certain niche not currently being handled.

Quoting 2H4 (Reply 26):
I can only imagine the rate of descent that could be achieved with those props in flat pitch...

I'd bet that it's got the potential, like all other airplanes, of a fantastic rate of descent!

Quoting Asturias (Reply 28):
Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 27):
Does it have anything inside it, or is it a shell, like the first A-380 was? Is it still overweight?


Yes, no, no, no.

asturias

When is it likely to fly? We certainly won't see it at Farnborough, right?
Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
 
texl1649
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:38 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Fri Jun 27, 2008 1:44 am

Looks terrific. Now, "Show me."
 
fridgmus
Posts: 1296
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:28 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Fri Jun 27, 2008 3:46 am

Absolutely Beautiful Aircraft! And those monster propellers! Shweeet! Well done Airbus, well done. bigthumbsup 

Wouldn't mind seeing one in USAF livery! I think she'd fit in quite nicely in between the C-130 and the C-17!

Now correct me if I'm wrong, but judging by the photographs, isn't that beauty just begging to be stretched???

F
The Lockheed Super Constellation, the REAL Queen of the Skies!
 
NoUFO
Posts: 7397
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2001 7:40 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Fri Jun 27, 2008 4:01 am



Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 27):
is it a shell, like the first A-380 was?

Not sure what you mean. The first A380 had watertanks and a couple of tons of technical equipment for the test flights in it. It wasn't an empty shell.

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 27):
Is it still overweight?

Was it ever overweight?
Airbus had problems with the engines, hence the 6-months delay, but I can not recall weight problems.

Quoting DL021 (Reply 30):
I wonder how important the plane is going to be in terms of actual orders?

With only little less than 200 firm orders on the books, the A400M is important. That's why Airbus' stock rates dropped significantly after they announced the 6-months delay.

Quoting DL021 (Reply 30):
When is it likely to fly?

Delivery is supposed to start in 2010, and the first test flight is tentatively scheduled for October.
I support the right to arm bears
 
Alien
Posts: 416
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:00 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Fri Jun 27, 2008 4:18 am



Quoting NoUFO (Reply 33):
With only little less than 200 firm orders on the books, the A400M is important.

As a government financed jobs program it clearly is important. One should note that only a handful of those 200 planes are destined for countries outside of Europe.
 
NoUFO
Posts: 7397
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2001 7:40 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Fri Jun 27, 2008 4:32 am

Quoting Alien (Reply 34):

I figured that DL021 asked if the project is important for Airbus, and at least investors obviously think it is. Military projects are almost always government financed.

Edit: Foreign governments often wait for tranche 2 aircraft when they fly-away-costs drop and the design is a little more proven. Against this backdrop, it is astonishing that Airbus already has orders from outside Europe.

[Edited 2008-06-26 21:37:23]
I support the right to arm bears
 
smeg
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:43 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Fri Jun 27, 2008 5:08 am



Quoting Alien (Reply 34):
As a government financed jobs program it clearly is important. One should note that only a handful of those 200 planes are destined for countries outside of Europe.

So what? You dont like it, dont order it.

It is the same as the tanker fiasco. The rest of the world seems to be quite happy with it. But if the USAF do not want it, fine, I am sure that Boeing will come up with something for the US.

Well done Airbus. Congrats to all on the workforce, and heres hoping that they all fly many safe and sucessful missions.
 
astuteman
Posts: 6340
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 7:50 pm

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Fri Jun 27, 2008 5:53 am



Quoting Alien (Reply 34):
As a government financed jobs program it clearly is important. One should note that only a handful of those 200 planes are destined for countries outside of Europe.

Like the KC767, you mean?  scratchchin 

Meanwhile, back at the ranch....

Congrats to Airbus, and the engine builders. Looks a fabulous plane. Hope they can progress from here with few problems.

Rgds
 
Nicoeddf
Posts: 509
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:13 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:57 am



Quoting Astuteman (Reply 37):
Like the KC767, you mean?

:D

Quoting Astuteman (Reply 37):
Meanwhile, back at the ranch....

Yep...so nothing more to say but that it is a beautiful plane and those props...gotta love them!
Those props on the A400 are like breasts on a nice lady...just fitting and incredibly huge without being artificial Big grin
 
hypersonic
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:36 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:58 am

Got to ask,
Antonov have or (had) potentially an equally capable aircraft if not even greater, being the AN-70.
Why did the Antonov fail to capture the market? - Seems the west 'are' gradually falling in love with Soviet freighters like the AN-124 anyway. So what was/is so wrong with the AN-70? - It was potentially available years before the A400M

When you compare the specs of the AN-70 to the A400M
The AN-70 could carry more, fly further, fly faster & fly higher, whilst being comparible in size..

Given that it beats the A400M in every department, what is so wrong with the AN-70 that practically no-one bought it?

I also think the AN-70 is a lovely aircraft!
 
slz396
Posts: 1883
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 7:01 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:59 am

Quoting Alien (Reply 34):
One should note that only a handful of those 200 planes are destined for countries outside of Europe.



Quoting Astuteman (Reply 37):
Like the KC767, you mean?

Or the Boeing C-17....

Wonder how many of those job programs Boeing is currently running for the US government.

Quoting Smeg (Reply 36):
It is the same as the tanker fiasco. The rest of the world seems to be quite happy with it. But if the USAF do not want it, fine, I am sure that Boeing will come up with something for the US.


Oh, but the USAF would die to get some asap! Its the politicians which don't want it!

Indeed, the rest of the world has no problems with selecting a superior platform even though it is not US made, but it seems US politicians have huge problems in admitting Europeans can technically outdo them in military planes too...

If US military hardware has to be US designed and built, then just say so and please stop pretending by running RFPs all the time...

[Edited 2008-06-27 02:28:04]
 
slz396
Posts: 1883
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 7:01 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Fri Jun 27, 2008 9:25 am

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 27):
Does it have anything inside it, or is it a shell, like the first A-380 was?

A shell? Well, it is a military aircraft, so surely you don't expect any seats and IFE systems to be installed in it, do you? It has all flight systems fitted though, so no, what you see here is not a plastic mock up bolted together with cheap but un-airworthy bolts from the local DIY store like a certain manufacturer embarrassingly seems to have used for its most recent roll-out event...  

[Edited 2008-06-27 02:29:08]
 
User avatar
autothrust
Posts: 1455
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 8:54 pm

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Fri Jun 27, 2008 9:55 am



Quoting Fridgmus (Reply 32):
isn't that beauty just begging to be stretched???

 checkmark   bigthumbsup 

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 27):
Does it have anything inside it, or is it a shell, like the first A-380 was?

The A380 wasn't a empty shell it had a minimal interior with technical stuff and a complete cockpit. I can show you the vid from the Power On.

However the 787 was a real empty shell with temploral fasteners from the local store.

Quoting Slz396 (Reply 40):
Or the Boeing C-17....

Or big parts of the 787.. a great plane and a great job building program.
“Faliure is not an option.”
 
F27Friendship
Posts: 1098
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:45 pm

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Fri Jun 27, 2008 9:58 am



Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 27):
like the first A-380 was

you mean 787, with cardboard nacelles...
 
scouseflyer
Posts: 2165
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 7:02 pm

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Fri Jun 27, 2008 10:54 am



Quoting Fridgmus (Reply 32):
Now correct me if I'm wrong, but judging by the photographs, isn't that beauty just begging to be stretched???

To me it's looks like it's gagging for a session in Willy Wonka's chewing gum stretching machine Big grin

It actually looks quite dinky until you see a photo with people in to give you an idea of the perspective.
 
User avatar
glideslope
Posts: 1422
Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 8:06 pm

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Fri Jun 27, 2008 11:08 am



Quoting Fridgmus (Reply 32):
Wouldn't mind seeing one in USAF livery! I think she'd fit in quite nicely in between the C-130 and the C-17!

Nice point. I agree. Perhaps we bag the KC-30 and purchase a load of A400's?

Nice compromise from a political point doable after the US election.
To know your Enemy, you must become your Enemy.” Sun Tzu
 
TSV
Posts: 1604
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 1999 12:13 pm

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Fri Jun 27, 2008 11:26 am

Be interesting to see it beside a Belfast!
"I told you I was ill ..." Spike Milligan
 
User avatar
Scooter01
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:06 pm

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Fri Jun 27, 2008 11:34 am

Second thing that struck me was the looks of the front fuselage-area, looks almost like a C-141 from the sides..

-First thing were the props:

Quoting 2H4 (Reply 26):
I can only imagine the rate of descent that could be achieved with those props in flat pitch...



Quoting NicoEDDF (Reply 38):
Yep...so nothing more to say but that it is a beautiful plane and those props...gotta love them!
Those props on the A400 are like breasts on a nice lady...just fitting and incredibly huge without being artificial

-and such a nice fat target for small-arms fire or heaven forbid, a birdstrike..   

But overall, it looks like it is ready for a mission.



Scooter01

[Edited 2008-06-27 04:41:16]
There is always a good reason to watch airplanes
 
Nicoeddf
Posts: 509
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:13 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Fri Jun 27, 2008 12:02 pm



Quoting Scooter01 (Reply 47):
and such a nice fat target for small-arms fire or heaven forbid, a birdstrike..

I guess, if any small-arms fire gets close and hits the prop...they won't care as they are armored, no?

And I guess the bird would have more of a problem than the prop...the ingestion chance on a prop is a LOT smaller than for a jet engine.
 
dragon6172
Posts: 795
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:56 am

RE: First A400M Rolled Out

Fri Jun 27, 2008 12:47 pm



Quoting NicoEDDF (Reply 48):
I guess, if any small-arms fire gets close and hits the prop...they won't care as they are armored, no?

Armored props? Really? Am I missing the sarcasm?

From the Airbus website:

Quote:
The propeller blades are of composite construction, having a carbon spar and a composite shell. A polyurethane coating is applied on the shell to protect against erosion. Electrical de-icing is used along the leading edge. The outer part of the blade leading edge has a nickel guard to protect against erosion.

Pretty strong I am sure, but armored I doubt.
Phrogs Phorever

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Stitch and 13 guests