328JET
Topic Author
Posts: 348
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 3:16 pm

EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:00 pm

http://www.kc45now.com/news-press-releases/2-24-2011.asp

Fore sure EADS seems to be disappointed that Boeing got the tanker deal.

But according the official statement, they see big opportunities in the future and it seems they have build-up a very good relationship with the US Military.


So what could be offered by EADS in the coming years which could be interesting for the US?

I could only see the A400M.

What are your thoughts?

[Edited 2011-02-25 12:01:57]
 
queb
Posts: 843
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 3:10 am

RE: EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:38 pm

Quoting 328JET (Thread starter):
I could only see the A400M.

Don't forget Eurocopter.

http://www.eurocopterusa.com/index/index.asp
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 22948
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:50 pm

So much for those commenting in the KC-X threads that EADS would never bother bidding on US defense projects again.   
 
328JET
Topic Author
Posts: 348
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 3:16 pm

RE: EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:54 pm

Quoting Stitch (Reply 2):
So much for those commenting in the KC-X threads that EADS would never bother bidding on US defense projects again.

Why should they?


The outcome of the tanker contest was very clear because of high prestige.

But transporter deals, or eurocopter deals?

Why not.
 
User avatar
Stitch
Posts: 22948
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:26 am

RE: EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Fri Feb 25, 2011 9:33 pm

Quoting 328JET (Reply 3):
The outcome of the tanker contest was very clear because of high prestige.

High prestige?

Flying the President of the United States around is pretty prestigious, be it in an airplane or a helicopter. And in the latter case, a European company won that contract (before they and the Bush Administration blew the specifications so far out of proportion that the costs became unacceptable).
 
328JET
Topic Author
Posts: 348
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 3:16 pm

RE: EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Fri Feb 25, 2011 9:38 pm

Quoting Stitch (Reply 4):
High prestige?

Yes, high prestige due to


1. the biggest order ever

2. the longest (and most watched) competition


To be honest, we had the same in germany, when the government got last minute offers for the Hornet, Strike Eag
le and Rafale instead of the Eurofighter.

We all know which aircraft was selcted...

 
 
MD11Engineer
Posts: 13916
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2003 5:25 am

RE: EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:03 pm

The most important thing for Airbus would have been to have a factory in the US, where the staff and overhead get paid in US $$$, so that they are less dependent on the USD / EURO exchange rate. With the military order they might have gotten it past especially the French unions (factory in the US as a requirement to get the order from the US government), but now it will be a bit difficult for them.

Jan
Je Suis Charlie et je suis Ahmet aussi
 
redflyer
Posts: 3881
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 3:30 am

RE: EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Fri Feb 25, 2011 11:44 pm

Quoting 328JET (Thread starter):
I could only see the A400M.

I wouldn't say "only". There is a huge gap in lift capability that the A400M could fill quite nicely, and that gap IMO would be worth far more in revenue than the KC-X program.

Of course, that's assuming the A400M remains the only flying option that fills that gap.
My other home is a Piper Cherokee 180C
 
BMI727
Posts: 11094
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:29 pm

RE: EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Sat Feb 26, 2011 7:21 am

Quoting 328JET (Thread starter):
I could only see the A400M

Not much need. Even less money.

Quoting queb (Reply 1):
Don't forget Eurocopter.

   Of course, they are already well in the door with the HH-65 Dolphin, but don't let that fool you. Just because the Coast Guard uses a socialist helicopter to fish Cubans out of the water, we still hate anything European.  
Quoting 328JET (Reply 3):
The outcome of the tanker contest was very clear because of high prestige.

When did tankers become prestigious? Especially more than transports?
Why do Aerospace Engineering students have to turn things in on time?
 
328JET
Topic Author
Posts: 348
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 3:16 pm

RE: EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Sat Feb 26, 2011 9:34 am

Quoting BMI727 (Reply 9):
Of course, they are already well in the door with the HH-65 Dolphin, but don't let that fool you. Just because the Coast Guard uses a socialist helicopter to fish Cubans out of the water, we still hate anything European

Do you...?

Strange, i had the feeling that quite some C27J are on order, which are italian in its origin and that you just topped up you order for the following helicopter for the army and navy:


http://www.eurocopterusa.com/news_features/2011/2-09-2011.asp
 
GDB
Posts: 12652
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 6:25 pm

RE: EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Sat Feb 26, 2011 10:22 am

What's a 'socialist helicopter?' If it's not a Mil or a Kamov?
Oh I see, France was part of the Warsaw Pact wasn't it, oddly just a few miles from France we did not notice that here.

A hell of a lot of Euro-copters in the US, mostly built there, from the UH-72 through all those police and EMA choppers.
 
User avatar
STT757
Posts: 13174
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2000 1:14 am

RE: EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Sat Feb 26, 2011 4:25 pm

Quoting BMI727 (Reply 8):
Of course, they are already well in the door with the HH-65 Dolphin, but don't let that fool you. Just because the Coast Guard uses a socialist helicopter to fish Cubans out of the water, we still hate anything European

You're forgetting about the 350 UH-72s Lakotas EADS is producing for the US Army.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurocopter_UH-72_Lakota

EADS is also preparing an Armed Scout bid to to replace the US Army's OH-58s, EADS most likely has the inside track on that order too which will be another hundred or two aircraft.

http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,216265,00.html
Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
 
osiris30
Posts: 2310
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 10:16 am

RE: EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Sat Feb 26, 2011 4:29 pm

Quoting BMI727 (Reply 8):
When did tankers become prestigious? Especially more than transports?

   My thoughts exactly. People are carrying on like this (the tanker deal) is the first deal EADS ever bid on for the US armed forces.
I don't care what you think of my opinion. It's my opinion, so have a nice day :)
 
queb
Posts: 843
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 3:10 am

RE: EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Sat Feb 26, 2011 5:15 pm

...ant the USCG HC-144A, based on the EADS CASA CN-235

http://www.uscg.mil/acquisition/mrs/projectdescription.asp
 
Devilfish
Posts: 5181
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 7:52 am

RE: EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Sat Feb 26, 2011 5:51 pm

  Would EADS revive the MAKO just in case?   

http://www.airforce-technology.com/p...ojects/mako/images/eads_mako_3.jpg
"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
 
roseflyer
Posts: 9606
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:34 am

RE: EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Sat Feb 26, 2011 7:02 pm

Well to start, EADS defense is a relatively small company when it comes to defense compared to the much larger US companies like Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrup Grumman, United Technologies, etc.

Quoting 328JET (Thread starter):


So what could be offered by EADS in the coming years which could be interesting for the US?

I could only see the A400M.

What are your thoughts?

Astrium: US has a strong relationship with Rocketdyne, Boeing, Northrup, UTC etc for satellites and I don't see it going to the less experienced Astrium. I think Astrium is going more in the direction of commercial and private projects rather than government projects. Also in that area, the export control requirements are extremely strict so a lot of the projects only allow US citizens to work on the projects and no technical information can leave US borders. That is not a case of corporate protectionism as it is a case of national security, so foreign companies are at a disadvantage.

Eurocopter: Already a supplier to the military including army and marines. I see potential there.

Cassidian: I think there is potential with their security systems, but there is a lot of competition from more experienced companies, so it will be an uphill battle. It all depends on the quality and price of what they can deliver. They are a pioneer in UAV technology which is a growing segment and I think has a lot of potential. Again missile technology is a tough sector for non-US companies because of the export control requirements.

Airbus: I don’t really see the need for the A400M as it is an airplane between the C130 and C-17 as far as size goes. The Air Force loves the C-17 even though it is a huge gas hog, although the production line is winding down.

Quoting 328JET (Thread starter):

But according the official statement, they see big opportunities in the future and it seems they have build-up a very good relationship with the US Military.

There are definitely big opportunities out there, but the article doesn't say they see big opportunities (I think that is your opinion since the article accurately states that the tanker was one of many opportunities) in the near future which I think is the case. There are no big opportunities in the future right now since the military is in a contraction state. Lockheed, Boeing and Northrup Grumman are all taking hits to their bottom lines and laying people off because of defense spending cuts. EADS would be pretty naïve if they thought that now is a time for big opportunities.
If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
 
BMI727
Posts: 11094
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:29 pm

RE: EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Sat Feb 26, 2011 10:42 pm

Quoting 328JET (Reply 9):
Quoting GDB (Reply 10):

Does sarcasm not work on the internet?
Why do Aerospace Engineering students have to turn things in on time?
 
328JET
Topic Author
Posts: 348
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 3:16 pm

RE: EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Sat Feb 26, 2011 10:51 pm

Quoting BMI727 (Reply 16):
Does sarcasm not work on the internet?

Sometimes sarcasm is not visible...  
 
sebolino
Posts: 3495
Joined: Tue May 29, 2001 11:26 pm

RE: EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Tue Mar 01, 2011 8:17 am

Quoting 328JET (Reply 17):
Quoting BMI727 (Reply 16):
Does sarcasm not work on the internet?

Sometimes sarcasm is not visible...

Ah come on, the joke was obvious ...



Congrats to Boeing, but did somebody ever doubt it would end like this ?
 
BMI727
Posts: 11094
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:29 pm

RE: EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Tue Mar 01, 2011 3:14 pm

Quoting sebolino (Reply 18):
Congrats to Boeing, but did somebody ever doubt it would end like this ?

Only everybody.
Why do Aerospace Engineering students have to turn things in on time?
 
sebolino
Posts: 3495
Joined: Tue May 29, 2001 11:26 pm

RE: EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Wed Mar 02, 2011 9:26 am

Quoting BMI727 (Reply 19):
Quoting sebolino (Reply 18):
Congrats to Boeing, but did somebody ever doubt it would end like this ?

Only everybody.

Uh ?

The most used sentence beginning about this contract on this site is "It will freeze in hell before ...", so I will say far from everybody.
Even if one never know what can happen, the "risk" of this contract going to a European company was very low. The subject became much too political for that.
 
BMI727
Posts: 11094
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:29 pm

RE: EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Thu Mar 03, 2011 5:56 am

Quoting sebolino (Reply 20):
Even if one never know what can happen, the "risk" of this contract going to a European company was very low. The subject became much too political for that.

I can tell you that quite a few people who followed this very closely and had a lot of interest in the contest did not see it that way. Many people fully expected Airbus to win the deal right up until Boeing was announced as the winner.
Why do Aerospace Engineering students have to turn things in on time?
 
User avatar
par13del
Posts: 6669
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:14 pm

RE: EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Thu Mar 03, 2011 7:05 pm

Quoting MD11Engineer (Reply 6):
With the military order they might have gotten it past especially the French unions (factory in the US as a requirement to get the order from the US government), but now it will be a bit difficult for them.

Boeing found a way to out-source a significant percentage of its 787 out-side of the US, if getting a facility on US soil is so important to EADS they could do that at any time, certainely there are enough Airbus a/c in the US to open maintenance facilities, or even an assembly line.
Personally - my opinion - I believe that what they want is for the US to pay for the facility with the same "State Infrastructure Tax Breaks, Benefits etc. that they protested at the WTO, which is the primary difference between a potential US plant and the plant in China.

In China EADS is involved in financing the line, since the US has bought itself into their current massive trade deficit, what is another few billion to create an EADS line, it is either greed or the leverage of US production facilities is simply fluff and not as important as they claim.
 
wvsuperhornet
Posts: 517
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 4:18 pm

RE: EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Fri Mar 04, 2011 5:55 am

With everyone in the US mad about the out sourcing of work and the un-employment it would be political suicide to order anything made out of the country the US has and can develop its own aircraft so if I was at EADS I wouldn't hold my breath for any contracts in the near future anyway. As far as the A400M very doubfull the US doesnt really need it.
 
olle
Posts: 496
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 3:38 am

RE: EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Fri Mar 18, 2011 1:34 am

US needs to be carefully about "made in US" policy. It can easily hit back while US is one of the largest exporters of military equipment. Made in Japan, Made in EU how will that effect US exporters?
 
wedgetail737
Posts: 3625
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 8:44 am

RE: EADS: Looking Out For Future US Deals

Fri Mar 18, 2011 3:53 am

I think ITAR restrictions could play a significant role as to who gets what. The tanker is fairly innocuous when it comes to protecting military intelligence. But I don't think you'll see EADS getting too many major US projects for a long-range bomber or surveillance aircraft.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Oroka and 18 guests