Airimages
Topic Author
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 8:13 am

Question About "Top Gun"

Mon Jun 06, 2011 5:07 pm

Hi all,

Does somebody know if "Top Gun" still exists and if yes, what aircraft do they fly today? Where are they located?

Thank you for your answers.

Cheers,

Jerome
 
User avatar
eksath
Crew
Posts: 1300
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 6:19 am

RE: Question About "Top Gun"

Mon Jun 06, 2011 5:29 pm

Quoting Airimages (Thread starter):
Does somebody know if "Top Gun" still exists and if yes, what aircraft do they fly today? Where are they located?

yes. It is combined with another squadron. More info:

http://www.cnic.navy.mil/Fallon/Abou...andAirWarfareCenterNSAWC/index.htm

at NAS Miramar

F-16,F/A-18, T-38...and others...



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Suresh A. Atapattu


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Suresh A. Atapattu


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Suresh A. Atapattu

World Wide Aerospace Photography
 
ulfinator
Posts: 290
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 5:35 am

RE: Question About "Top Gun"

Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:36 pm

Quoting eksath (Reply 1):
at NAS Miramar

Maybe I am mistaken but NAS Miramar was BRAC'd and they are now at NAS Fallon.
 
User avatar
Tugger
Posts: 6013
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:38 am

RE: Question About "Top Gun"

Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:46 pm

Quoting ulfinator (Reply 2):
NAS Miramar was BRAC'd

Correct, there is no more "NAS Miramar", however it was not BRAC'd for closure, it was realigned and is now "MCAS Miramar". (Seems all those senior commanders really like being stationed out here just before they retire   )

Tugg
I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
 
mechatnew
Posts: 110
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 5:59 am

RE: Question About "Top Gun"

Mon Jun 06, 2011 11:13 pm

NSAWC flies the F-16A/B, F/A-18A/B/C/D/F, E-2C, and M/HH-60. There is another unit, VFC-13 that flies the F-5F/N at NAS Fallon.
 
Airimages
Topic Author
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 8:13 am

RE: Question About "Top Gun"

Tue Jun 07, 2011 7:24 pm

Thanks for your answer!

Jerome
 
Devilfish
Posts: 5211
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 7:52 am

RE: Question About "Top Gun"

Sat Oct 15, 2011 3:55 am

Here's an old, very distinctive F-5E in black airshow scheme out of NAS Fallon.....

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Frank J. Mirande
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © John Olafson


Caption on the latest photo on the right says it's now part of a private collection. Wonder if they reapplied the stunning black adversary livery?
"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
 
NBGSkyGod
Posts: 810
Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 7:30 am

RE: Question About "Top Gun"

Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:33 pm

Miramar went to the Marines as a compromise for the closure of MCAS El Toro and Tustin, most of those units went to Miramar. The Navy went to Fallon.
Pilots are idots, who at any given moment will attempt to kill themselves or others.
 
Cadet985
Posts: 1957
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2002 6:45 am

RE: Question About "Top Gun"

Tue Oct 18, 2011 3:31 am

Is the "Fightertown USA" hangar still at Miramar?

Marc
 
NBGSkyGod
Posts: 810
Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 7:30 am

RE: Question About "Top Gun"

Thu Oct 20, 2011 11:59 am

The Hangar is there, but it no longer says Fightertown USA on it.
Pilots are idots, who at any given moment will attempt to kill themselves or others.
 
Cadet985
Posts: 1957
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2002 6:45 am

RE: Question About "Top Gun"

Sat Oct 22, 2011 5:35 am

Quoting NBGSkyGod (Reply 9):
The Hangar is there, but it no longer says Fightertown USA on it.

That's sad. It should have been declared a landmark!

What about something I vaguely remember hearing several years ago about a restaurant (probably in the Miramar area) that is filled with memorablia and props from the movie?

Marc
 
LMP737
Posts: 4809
Joined: Wed May 08, 2002 4:06 pm

RE: Question About "Top Gun"

Sat Oct 22, 2011 4:31 pm

Quoting NBGSkyGod (Reply 7):
Miramar went to the Marines as a compromise for the closure of MCAS El Toro and Tustin, most of those units went to Miramar. The Navy went to Fallon.

Just shows what a bizzaro world the decisions making in DC can be. They should have closed NAS Miramar and handed it over to the city of San Diego and have them do with it as they pleased. This coming from someone who was stationed there and has many fond memories of the place.
Never take financial advice from co-workers.
 
studedave
Posts: 463
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 4:21 am

RE: Question About "Top Gun"

Sun Oct 23, 2011 12:58 am

Quoting Cadet985 (Reply 10):
What about something I vaguely remember hearing several years ago about a restaurant (probably in the Miramar area) that is filled with memorablia and props from the movie?

If you mean the Kansas City Bar and Grille in downtown San Diego- they had a fire about three years ago~
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOa78OF4fd4

Last I heard was that it would be re-built, and that they were looking for more items to have on display.
But they appear to be back open~ http://www.kcbbq.net/

[Edited 2011-10-22 18:02:56 by studedave]
Classic planes, Classic trains, and Studebakers~~ what else is there???
 
LMP737
Posts: 4809
Joined: Wed May 08, 2002 4:06 pm

RE: Question About "Top Gun"

Mon Oct 24, 2011 4:25 pm

Quoting Cadet985 (Reply 10):
What about something I vaguely remember hearing several years ago about a restaurant (probably in the Miramar area) that is filled with memorablia and props from the movie?

On occasion I'll watch the movie just for the entertainment value of seeing all the errors in it.
Never take financial advice from co-workers.
 
AAR90
Posts: 3140
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2000 11:51 am

RE: Question About "Top Gun"

Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:06 pm

Quoting LMP737 (Reply 11):
Just shows what a bizzaro world the decisions making in DC can be. They should have closed NKX / KNKX), USA - California AND Mountain View - Moffett Federal Airfield (NAS) (NUQ / KNUQ), USA - California AND Nassau - Lynden Pindling International (Windsor Field) (NAS / MYNN), Bahamas">NAS Miramar and handed it over to the city of San Diego and have them do with it as they pleased. This coming from someone who was stationed there and has many fond memories of the place.

Bizzaro political non-decisions reign supreme here in San Diego as well. Especially concerning the future commercial air operations/airport(s). NKX was simply "closed" for more than a year as the DOD gave the city time to consider an offer: $1 cash and you get ALL the land and the air navigation rights (read: no noise litigation) that come with NKX. Not surprising, local politicians couldn't make a decision --they started another "study" AFTER the year deadline expired-- so by the time they decided they wanted to have "serious discussions" with DOD on the future of NKX, the DOD had already made their decision.... USMC was being kicked out of Tustin & El Toro and the BRAC proposal to move all of their ops to MCAS Yuma was simply not operationally feasible so.... USMC had already begun the move to the then vacant NKX.

Not to worry though. The politicians made sure they killed the Fightertown spirit long before they got around to deciding to kill the base itself.   
*NO CARRIER* -- A Naval Aviator's worst nightmare!
 
Max Q
Posts: 5634
Joined: Wed May 09, 2001 12:40 pm

RE: Question About "Top Gun"

Tue Oct 25, 2011 12:37 am

Some of those earlier Top Gun Pilots may be flying rubber dog sh*t out of Hong Kong by now..
The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
 
HaveBlue
Posts: 2107
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2004 3:01 pm

RE: Question About "Top Gun"

Wed Oct 26, 2011 2:54 am

Quoting AAR90 (Reply 14):
NKX was simply "closed" for more than a year as the DOD gave the city time to consider an offer: $1 cash and you get ALL the land and the air navigation rights (read: no noise litigation) that come with NKX. Not surprising, local politicians couldn't make a decision --they started another "study" AFTER the year deadline expired--

If that's accurate, and I trust you that it is, that is amazing shortsightedness on the part of the politicians. For less than a cup of Joe you could've got an airport, the land and all that noise litigation free? Unbelievable.
Here Here for Severe Clear!
 
AAR90
Posts: 3140
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2000 11:51 am

RE: Question About "Top Gun"

Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:59 pm

Quoting HaveBlue (Reply 16):
If that's accurate, and I trust you that it is, that is amazing shortsightedness on the part of the politicians. For less than a cup of Joe you could've got an airport, the land and all that noise litigation free? Unbelievable.

One has to remember that the NAS Miramar option was just one of many wasted opportunities in the 50+ year history of San Diego politicians (all of them) continually "studying" the issue, but never making an actual decision. Hence, after 50+ years we still have the single-runway Lindbergh Field as San Diego's "major" civilian airport.   
*NO CARRIER* -- A Naval Aviator's worst nightmare!
 
User avatar
Tugger
Posts: 6013
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:38 am

RE: Question About "Top Gun"

Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:54 pm

Quoting HaveBlue (Reply 16):
If that's accurate, and I trust you that it is, that is amazing shortsightedness on the part of the politicians. For less than a cup of Joe you could've got an airport, the land and all that noise litigation free? Unbelievable.

What's being said is not quite accurate.

The base was closed and offered to the city for $1 back in 1954, not during the recent BRAC's. Of the recent BRAC's none recommended relinquishing the base though there were various groups that lobbied the commission for and against the idea as the BRAC commission considered which bases to close or realign.

While it may seem crazy that the city turned down the base in 1954, back then it was just too remote and Lindbergh Field was doing fine. San Diego was basically thought of as a sleepy little town back then and everyone lived fairly close to the city center. Miramar was over ten miles away and in between was Montgomery Field which was already a working local airport that the city had just acquired in 1948 (potentially to replace Lindbergh). Sure with 20/20 hindsight it was very shortsighted to not accept the offer but no one knew that a city that wasn't even in the top twenty of big cities in the USA would grow into the top ten within 30 years.

Tugg
I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
 
AAR90
Posts: 3140
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2000 11:51 am

RE: Question About "Top Gun"

Thu Oct 27, 2011 12:31 am

Quoting tugger (Reply 18):
What's being said is not quite accurate.

The base was closed and offered to the city for $1 back in 1954, not during the recent BRAC's.

In 1954, it was a formal offer "on paper." There were two other "unofficial offers" prior to the BRAC closing. After the BRAC closure announcement but prior to USN actually closing the base, DOD (not USN) offered the property to the City of San Diego. Informally asking if the city was still "not interested" in acquiring the property and if the city was interested, the $1 offer was still "on the table."

Sources: NAS Miramar staff members who participated in two meetings with the Mayor's office on this subject alone.
*NO CARRIER* -- A Naval Aviator's worst nightmare!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests