787atPAE
Topic Author
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 12:40 pm

F-35 Sonic Boom

Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:03 pm

Ran across this in the interwebs. The person filming is watching a UAV type of vehicle kind of close to F-35 flight testing when the F-35 breaks the sound barrier in a big way, followed by its F-16 chase (which was much more quiet)!!

http://youtu.be/RiHNBbxgUKs
 
vikkyvik
Posts: 11764
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:58 pm

RE: F-35 Sonic Boom

Sun Aug 05, 2012 10:36 pm

Quoting 787atPAE (Thread starter):
when the F-35 breaks the sound barrier in a big way, followed by its F-16 chase (which was much more quiet)!!

Just FYI for clarity's sake (sorry if you know this already), that's not the F-35 "breaking the sound barrier" as such. Meaning, that's not right when it goes supersonic. You get a sonic boom the entire time the aircraft is supersonic. You'll only hear it when the boom passes over you.
I'm watching Jeopardy. The category is worst Madonna songs. "This one from 1987 is terrible".
 
User avatar
kanban
Posts: 3642
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:00 am

RE: F-35 Sonic Boom

Sun Aug 05, 2012 11:03 pm

so much for stealth... BOOM we're coming. Count the booms and you'll know how many .. Using a weather radar that tracks lightening strikes should show the plane's path.
 
rwessel
Posts: 2448
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:47 pm

RE: F-35 Sonic Boom

Mon Aug 06, 2012 5:52 am

Quoting kanban (Reply 2):
so much for stealth... BOOM we're coming. Count the booms and you'll know how many ..

Certainly audible detection of aircraft is possible, and it has been done. It's limited because of its fairly short range, and largely trails the aircraft (completely so in the case of supersonic flight). Presumably if it's a problem for a particular ingress route to a target, you'd expect a subsonic approach.

Quoting kanban (Reply 2):
Using a weather radar that tracks lightening strikes should show the plane's path.

Lightning detection is about detecting the electrical impulse of the lightning, not the consequent thunder, so would be useless for detecting sonic booms.
 
vikkyvik
Posts: 11764
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:58 pm

RE: F-35 Sonic Boom

Mon Aug 06, 2012 6:51 am

Quoting rwessel (Reply 3):
Quoting kanban (Reply 2):
Using a weather radar that tracks lightening strikes should show the plane's path.

Lightning detection is about detecting the electrical impulse of the lightning, not the consequent thunder, so would be useless for detecting sonic booms.

I may be wrong, but I thought he was joking.

F-35 Lightning, you know......
I'm watching Jeopardy. The category is worst Madonna songs. "This one from 1987 is terrible".
 
User avatar
kanban
Posts: 3642
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:00 am

RE: F-35 Sonic Boom

Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:04 pm

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 4):
I may be wrong, but I thought he was joking.


I was. Sometimes discussing the F-35 needs a little humor without a big sign (HUMOR AHEAD)
 
User avatar
bikerthai
Posts: 2152
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:45 pm

RE: F-35 Sonic Boom

Mon Aug 06, 2012 6:37 pm

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 4):

He got me too. The only thing that would give it away was if instead of "BOOM we're coming" he would have written "BOOM we've were here". As 'lightening strike" would refer to the location where the F-35 "struck".

bt
Intelligent seeks knowledge. Enlightened seeks wisdom.
 
vikkyvik
Posts: 11764
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:58 pm

RE: F-35 Sonic Boom

Mon Aug 06, 2012 6:43 pm

Quoting kanban (Reply 5):
I was. Sometimes discussing ANYTHING needs a little humor without a big sign (HUMOR AHEAD)

Fixed for you.  

There's nothing I hate more than having to make humorous/sarcastic remarks obvious, by using smileys or whatever.

If people don't get it, oh well.
I'm watching Jeopardy. The category is worst Madonna songs. "This one from 1987 is terrible".

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests