User avatar
ssteve
Posts: 1161
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 8:32 am

Time On MC-12W Crash In Afghanistan

Wed Oct 30, 2013 5:03 pm

http://swampland.time.com/2013/10/30/the-crash-of-independence-08/

Quote:
Sometimes, a 99.96% success rate isn’t good enough. That’s how often the Air Force’s MC-12W Liberty spy planes arrive overhead when needed by U.S. troops on the ground in Afghanistan.

The twin-turboprop planes are modified versions of the Hawker Beechcraft Super King Air 350. Their crew of four includes a pair of pilots and a pair of backseat sensor operators, who funnel video to ground-pounders down below. The fleet has played a key role in the killing or capture of more than 700 high-value insurgents in Afghanistan over the past four years, the Air Force says.

Read more: The Inside Story of a Deadly Air Force Crash | TIME.com http://swampland.time.com/2013/10/30...ZDiiZ
 
rc135x
Posts: 258
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 11:46 am

RE: Time On MC-12W Crash In Afghanistan

Wed Oct 30, 2013 6:10 pm

An interesting report, but Time's emphasis on the limits of the MC-12 itself misses the point entirely.

This was pilot error from the beginning. Blaming the lack of visual references is duplicitous. Even in CAVU a pilot should spend maybe 5% of his visual cross check in the cockpit and that would have caught the deceleration in the climb. Too long for the PIC to intervene. Poor training and crew management? You bet.

But there is nothing in the report to suggest that the airplane was at fault.

Another sad story of crew inexperience leading to fatalities.
KC-135A, A(RT), D, E, E(RT), Q, R, EC-135A, C, G, L, RC-135S, U, V, W, X, TC-135S, W
 
AirRyan
Posts: 2398
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 9:57 am

RE: Time On MC-12W Crash In Afghanistan

Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:21 pm

Quoting rc135x (Reply 1):

Another sad story of crew inexperience leading to fatalities.

Two commissioned pilots on a King Air is over-kill to begin with, as the aircraft are FAA single-pilot rated.
 
zanl188
Posts: 3443
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 9:05 pm

RE: Time On MC-12W Crash In Afghanistan

Mon Nov 11, 2013 3:31 pm

Quoting AirRyan (Reply 2):
Two commissioned pilots on a King Air is over-kill to begin with, as the aircraft are FAA single-pilot rated.

While ferrying, yes... but in a combat environment? Considerably different workload environment in the MC-12 while on a mission..
Legal considerations provided by: Dewey, Cheatum, and Howe
 
L-188
Posts: 29881
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 1999 11:27 am

RE: Time On MC-12W Crash In Afghanistan

Wed Nov 13, 2013 7:45 pm

2 man crews are pretty standard with all Army aircraft. Four if you need a chief and a door gunner.

I didn't think too much of them dogging the mods for the military mission.npunlic service aircraft aren't required to be certified period.
OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
 
JohnM
Posts: 379
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2001 12:35 pm

RE: Time On MC-12W Crash In Afghanistan

Wed Nov 13, 2013 8:16 pm

Quoting L-188 (Reply 4):


This was a USAF aircraft.

Workload can get high with lots of radios and tactical considerations. They did not have nap of the earth flying and small arms fire issues, but I would think things could and did get busy for them at times.
 
rc135x
Posts: 258
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 11:46 am

RE: Time On MC-12W Crash In Afghanistan

Wed Nov 13, 2013 9:59 pm

Quoting zanl188 (Reply 3):
While ferrying, yes... but in a combat environment? Considerably different workload environment in the MC-12 while on a mission..

Let's see:

combat environment---dropping bombs, firing cannon, evading ground fire, etc

number of *pilots* in extant US combat aircraft: A-10 x 1; F-16 x 1; F/A-18 x 1; F-15 x 1

MC-12 "combat" role: stand off special operations

I just don't see the need for 2 pilots in an MC-12 based on "combat environment" when the front-line combat aircraft have only a single pilot (it doesn't matter how many mission specialists/WSOs are on board jets like F-15Es and F/A-18Fs because the crash was related exclusively to pilot performance).

Quoting JohnM (Reply 5):
Workload can get high with lots of radios and tactical considerations.

Not a problem for FAC A-10Cs now any more than it's been for FACs ranging from O-1s and O-2s to OV-10s and OA-37s, all of which were normally flown by a single pilot. If the pilot can't hack it s/he shouldn't be flying alone in ANY airplane.

Ultimately the failings of the pilots should not be obscured with extraneous noise about the need for 1 or 2 pilots on the MC-12.
KC-135A, A(RT), D, E, E(RT), Q, R, EC-135A, C, G, L, RC-135S, U, V, W, X, TC-135S, W
 
JohnM
Posts: 379
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2001 12:35 pm

RE: Time On MC-12W Crash In Afghanistan

Wed Nov 13, 2013 10:46 pm

Quoting rc135x (Reply 6):
Ultimately the failings of the pilots should not be obscured with extraneous noise about the need for 1 or 2 pilots on the MC-12.


Spot on. Just saying the extra distractions can cause issues with some folks. Should it cause problems? No. Gotta fly the plane. Always job #1.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests