>N400QX is in Washington which is a Democratic state anyway so he can write himself in for all I care
Yes, you're right... It was 55%-40% in favor of Gore here if I remember correctly. So, yes, I could just write myself in.
The only reason I would vote for Bush in 2004 would be if the polls in Washington State are close enough to matter, which I doubt, but it could happen. With the wacko leftists in this state and not a sufficient amount of conservatives to balance the scales, we're at a disadvantage. Hopefully the Green Party candidate will get 10% or more of the vote!!!
>Bush's little brother had to rig the election for Bush to win.
Any more unsubstantiated lies to spread on the forum, Superfly?
>He pulled out of the Kyoto agreement when his country is the largest producer of greenhouse gasses
He 'pulled out' of the Kyoto treaty because it is bad for the United States. By the way, I haven't seen ANY other nations sign it with the exception of one. So you know where you can shove that...
>Bush is an arrogant man that only cares about power
Superfly- I guess someone else is posting the unsubstantiated lies for you this time. GunFighter6-- where is your proof? Oh- the New York Times editorial page?
>. As for rejecting new arsenic standards, who knows...
You know what-- the OLD standards were GOOD ENOUGH FOR CLINTON for eight years. Clinton only wrote the executive order to put new standards into place just before he left the presidency. So if you're going to whine about Bush repealing them, you need to whine about Clinton not doing anything about them for eight years
And people say that Americans are ignorant! No wonder why
- many of us get our news from the New York Times or Washington Post!