Rogue, I realize this is long, please hear me out, then tear me apart afterward.
simple real estate dispute
hahaha. That's hilarious. I'll believe that when they start giving legitimate reasons why they should have the land. If you say "Because my ancestors had it" is not enough for the Jews, then it is not enough for the Arabs. Besides, the jews did pay for the land in good faith during the early days of zionism. Finally, military conquest has always been a legitimate claim to land. Haven't you ever heard the phrase "To the victors go the spoils."?
The Israelis are holding strategic territory on the West Bank and Gaza Strip. To give it up would put them at a disadvantage when the arabs launch a military attack.
Also 1.)Those Arabs that are killing the Jews are claiming that it is in the name of Allah, and they have a relatively large number of religious leaders that agree with them. I haven't heard any Jew say they're killing Arabs in the name of God, and if they do, their leaders deny it. Christians have been known to practice that in the past, but since the laity has been allowed to read the scripture they realize that there is no place in the new testament that even remotely advocates violence as a legitimate means to promote Christianity, in fact they were to endure persecution, and not fight back, because Christ did not fight back.
Now Islam, on the other hand, by it's own admission, no matter how they want to sugar coat it, has the idea of Jihad, or holy war, to promote their religion. That is why there were the Moors, and the Ottomans, and other Islamic empires that turned the area under their control into Theocracies. I.E. Conversion by force. This was meant to convert the world.
Jews, also, were commanded by God to drive out the peoples in this small area of land now called Palestine. They were not there to convert people, but to destroy them or put them elsewhere. This was also not a global thing, it had very specific boundaries.
anyway my real point is that this is, really, a spiritual thing. It will not stop until one side is proven wrong beyond a reasonable doubt, or is destroyed completely.
Finally, the USSR did exist at that time. One had to deal with it because no one could destroy it. Finally it fell from within. The other governments you mentioned either fell from within, or if they were taken over by force it did not change the people living in the area. The Arabs want the Jews out. Israel could cease to exist as a soverign country, but if the Jews remained the Palestinians would not be satasfied. The worst part, there is no place in the world to move the Jews that they would be welcomed with open arms, because they want a community of their own. Who would give them the land or the opportunity for that. Even if the UN told them to give up the land of Israel they would say NO! After saying No they would fight whomever tried to take their land from them. In their eyes it is their land. No where else is their land. They would conquer and win, or be utterly destroyed trying. The problem I have with your argument is that you say it is anti-semetic, you just want the Palestinians to have their land. Unfortunately the only way to accomplish that is to destroy the Jews. So in practice, your arguments are extremely anti-semetic.