I just watched the IRAQI monitering committee press conference this morning, where the head person declared to the world media that "Mr Hans Blix has now reported that IRAQ is weapons free, and where Mr Hans Blix has declared that the Americans and British are submitting fake documents" he has called for all sanctions to be lifted.
This press conference goes out worldwide, and the French, German and all the arab countries watch it and hear that Mr Blix has reported that IRAQ is weapons free.
WHY is it that Mr Blix doesn't go public in rebuttal of these comments ? He has a responsibility to the world community, and he should be saying " I certainly DID NOT say that IRAQ is weapons free, and reiterate his questions about where the 6500 warheads that are unaccounted for are, where the VX
gas that is unaccounted for.
Lately, he seems to be a little absent minded about the IRAQI drone with chemical sprayer that was flying about, he left it out of his report, yet a document that turns out to be innaccurate is brought by him to a press conference.
All this does is fuel anti war sentiment, but isn't actually true.
I think America and Britain should hold referendums on what the country wants, if the people of America and the People of Britain vote that they do not want to go to war (which they will) then Bush and Blair should then be able to say to their people that "We respect your choice and will abide by it, BUT, with this, we cannot protect you, and cannot be criticised when the next attack happens, as you have tied our hands.
When the next attack happens, or whenever the US troops end up covered in VX
gas, the world will not say "oh, I thought IRAQ didn't have those, they will say America provoked it"
Saddamed if you do, Saddamed if you dont