Guest

It's Not The War You Hate

Sun Mar 23, 2003 12:55 am

It's not the War that you hate. It's President Bush you hate. You hate the fact that he won and Gore lost. He is the permanent salt in your permanent wound. You resent the fact that he has no use for gays, the uneducated, the Politically Correct, and those addicted to Government assistance like heroin. You're nostalgic about the '90's, a time of peace, prosperity, and endless promise. You're bitter about your present. You're leary about your future. Bush represents all of this animosity you feel. If Gore was in the Oval Office running this exact same war, he would have 200% of your support. You would not support Bush if he told you that the Earth was round.

Thank you.

[Edited 2003-03-22 17:06:46]
 
cwapilot
Posts: 1085
Joined: Mon May 01, 2000 7:10 am

RE: It's Not The War You Hate

Sun Mar 23, 2003 1:06 am

(Begin Sarcasm)
But Gore wouldn't have led this war. Tanks would have been outlawed under an expanded Kyoto Protocal anyhow. The US would have repented and admitted that it is indeed inferior to the cultural and intellectual richness that is Europe. We'd all being wearing berets and singing in the streets, which would be devoid of evil automobiles. Saddam would have disarmed on his own because, well, Gore talked to him at a Miami resort and, well, they really hit it off. Plus, ole Saddam is just that sort of guy. The legacy of meaninglessness and symbolism over substance of The Great Leader, His Eminence Billy Jeff Clinton, would be carried forth like a torch. The middle class would continue to pay for those who do not chose to work, and the wealthy, bastards as they are, would be taxed into oblivion and sent into exile. The world would be perfect. All further elections would then be set aside, and decided by a bunch of party hacks obsessed with chads, and then referred for litigation when they do not produce the desired results. One could only dream.......
(End Sarcasm)

Southside Irish...our two teams are the White Sox and whoever plays the Cubs!
 
galaxy5
Posts: 1952
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2000 10:09 pm

RE: It's Not The War You Hate

Sun Mar 23, 2003 1:07 am

Amen Cerulean, alot of what you say is so true , if gore or Clinton was running the show right now, first we wouldnt be doing anything right now here in Iraq or in Afghanistan ( if we were i would support him 100% as i do support bush). But sadly to most of the Anti-war bunch on here it is so obvious its 95% just anti-bush.
"damn, I didnt know prince could Ball like that" - Charlie Murphy
 
cwapilot
Posts: 1085
Joined: Mon May 01, 2000 7:10 am

RE: It's Not The War You Hate

Sun Mar 23, 2003 1:12 am

(Restart Sarcasm)
Forgot to mention, there is a great possibility that DC would be shut down, as it contains too much for Americans to be proud of, and the new capital would be located in either Los Angeles or San Francisco...the Hollwood lobby is duking it out with the Gay and Lesbain Alliance/PETA/NARAL alliance for the final choice. Arab terrorists would once again be free to exercise their rights to give us what we deserve, unhindered by that pesky Tom Ridge guy.
(End Sarcasm)
Southside Irish...our two teams are the White Sox and whoever plays the Cubs!
 
Ilyushin96M
Posts: 2506
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 1999 3:15 am

RE: It's Not The War You Hate

Sun Mar 23, 2003 1:26 am

Well guys, Gore is NOT running our country. Why is it so many conservatives love the "If Gore or Clinton were..." scenario? Get over it. Clinton is no longer in office, Gore did not win the 2000 election. Period. End of story. MOVE ON.

I don't hate Bush. Hate is a strong word to use. I dislike his policies and backward ideas, and I don't agree with the regressive trends he's brought to our country. The results are pretty plain to see. Also, I think he does not command respect very well, is not well-spoken, and is catastrophically ignorant as to how the rest of the world works.

Cerulean, you make a few valid points. "You resent the fact that he has no use for gays..." Yeah, that affects me. The president of this country needs to consider the rights of everyone, not just Christian heterosexuals. "...the uneducated...and those addicted to Government assistance like heroin." I'm not one to advocate keeping people dependent on hand-outs, but cutting them off entirely won't solve the problem. It's hard to say what the solution to this problem would be - empowering them to get an education and get jobs is a good start.

"You're nostalgic about the '90's, a time of peace, prosperity, and endless promise." Who isn't? Those were excellent years we had, and I would like to see our economy stabilise, and prosperity return to our country.

As for peace...what peace can there be if the Bush administration seems bent on finding reasons to wage war? What's been missing from their policies and communications has been the ability to enlist or enroll other countries' governments in supporting and assisting in the current conflict. Diplomacy failed, not so much because all measures were exhausted, but because the wrong approach was taken. "Either you're with us or you're against us" has alienated many of our former allies, and bullying other countries into submission has only caused them to dig in their heels and resist. It's hard to say how "things might have gone otherwise..." We are where we are, and there's no going back. But I think Bush's attitudes have created alot of problems that could have been avoided.

So, I don't hate Bush. I've realised over the past few days that having animosity towards him and his administration serves no purpose. I can't and won't agree with much of what they do, and I hope 2004 brings a new government with better policies and attitudes.
 
Guest

RE: It's Not The War You Hate

Sun Mar 23, 2003 1:33 am

"Either you're with us or you're against us" has alienated many of our former allies, and bullying other countries into submission has only caused them to dig in their heels and resist.

I believe that you have hit the Jackpot Key Point there Mr.96M.

Obviously Mr Bush has not had any schooling in psychology and People Skills. Human nature, being what it is, especially when dealing with males, rightly or wrongly, is going to say that the minute you try and take a dictatorial attitude, the person you are up against will turn against you like a junkyard dog. The legitimacy of the issue at hand suddenly becomes a very distant second. It very quickly escalates into an old fashioned ego contest. (this explains both foreign policy and drive by shootings)

To tell you the truth, I do not blame the rest of the world for turning against us. Italy, for example, had little or nothig to do with 9/11. They can say "geez that's too bad..." to the US.

But why should they be forced to choose sides?

As a crusty old male, if someone tried to extort me like that, I too would tell him to shove it and sidle up to "the enemy.
 
david b.
Posts: 2894
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 7:18 pm

RE: It's Not The War You Hate

Sun Mar 23, 2003 1:36 am

At least the 2004 elections are comming up. I say vote for a new president.
Teenage-know-it-alls should be shot on sight
 
airplay
Posts: 3369
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 1:58 am

RE: It's Not The War You Hate

Sun Mar 23, 2003 1:43 am

You hate the fact that he won and Gore lost.

Democracy: Government by popular representation; a form of government in which the supreme power is retained by the people, but is indirectly exercised through a system of representation and delegated authority periodically renewed; a constitutional representative government; a republic.

"Popular representation". If that was true, Gore would be in the Whitehouse. The way US elections go, you should just forego all the expensive crap and flip a coin....
 
N79969
Posts: 6605
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2002 1:43 am

RE: It's Not The War You Hate

Sun Mar 23, 2003 1:57 am

I tend to agree with you Cerulean.

However, I think there is a big part of this country that does not fit that description and has been very uneasy about the war. This war is unprecedented in our history and takes us into uncharted waters. The doctrine of preemption is very risk. I think the skepticism voiced by such conservatives as Brent Scowcroft and Norman Schwarzkop demonstrates what I am talking about.
 
Guest

RE: It's Not The War You Hate

Sun Mar 23, 2003 2:37 am

I'm with En on this one (picked that up from HM--like it?) I agree; the doctrine of preemption is what gives me the most concern about this war. But, for me, it's like this: (and it might be weak, but it's all I have to go on right now)

It's my opinion that GWB would not have taken such a huge political risk if he were not sure that Hussien's regime had supported Al-Queda or other terrorist organizations. So, all I can do is support the military, which includes the Commander in Chief.

Now, if it is proven that Hussien's regime has links to Al-Queda or other terrorist organizations, then I would say that this preemptive war is fully justified (because, if that were the case, then it isn't really a preemptive war--Iraq would, in effect, have drawn first blood on 9/11.)

If it is proven that Hussien's regime did not support terrorists (a long shot), then there's nothing I can do other than simply vote a different way in November 2004. (And if that is the case, in all honesty, having a new regime in Iraq still wouldn't bother me--I would regret that it was done preemptively, but still...)

And that's how I see it. I suppose we will all find out sooner or later.

And either way, I'm not going to join some silly demonstration. I don't want to marginalize myself like that.

Oh, and one more thing: "It's President Bush you hate. You hate the fact that he won and Gore lost. He is the permanent salt in your permanent wound."

I think this factor definitely plays a role. You guys can whine about Gore for as long as you want. It will not change the fact that Bush is president.

'Speed



[Edited 2003-03-22 18:51:30]
 
N202PA
Posts: 1280
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2000 9:44 pm

RE: It's Not The War You Hate

Sun Mar 23, 2003 3:01 am

"Popular representation". If that was true, Gore would be in the Whitehouse. The way US elections go, you should just forego all the expensive crap and flip a coin....

"Popular representation" does not necessarily mean "popular vote". It means an electoral system by which the voice of the people can be heard. The specific method by which that is carried out is not implied. Also, please consider that we have a Republic, not a straight democracy - which explains the electoral system we have now.

The Electoral College system has stood in this country for well over 200 years without major problems until the 2000 election. All of a sudden, the Democrats get snitty about it and call it a travesty because they don't like the outcome. Well, sorry, but those were the rules we were playing with before the game began. Gore lost fair and square. And even he doesn't complain about it anymore - he got on with his life (and just might surprise everyone by winning the office in the end, say 2008 or 2012).

I do think the Electoral College system could stand some reforms, but I believe the general principle to be sound. It's what's natural in a republican (small "r") government.
 
heavymetal
Posts: 4442
Joined: Fri May 08, 2015 3:37 am

RE: It's Not The War You Hate

Sun Mar 23, 2003 5:32 am

You're right Cerulean, it's about hating Bush.

Kinda like all the whiney bitching we heard from you 'angry white men' about Clinton for 8 years?

Here's to "regime change" in 04. Course if that happens, I don't think a court case about a blowjob is gonna suffice for you people.
 
teva
Posts: 1764
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2001 12:31 am

RE: It's Not The War You Hate

Sun Mar 23, 2003 5:50 am

N202PA, Bush election is not the first one where a US president is elected even if he has less votes than the other candidate.
But I think it is the first time you have suche a difference (around 500,000 votes)
Don't you think it is time to think about a revision of the process?
200 years ago, you didn't have so many States. A lot of things have changed. We are flying every day. An American has walked on the moon...
This time, Republicans are happy, because Bush has been elected. But maybe for the nex election, it will be exactly the opposite. Maybe Bush will have more votes, but a Democrat will be in the WHite House...
I note that you are in favor of some changes in the system. But do you really think it is something this administration will do?
Teva
Ecoute les orgues, Elles jouent pour toi...C'est le requiem pour un con
 
B747forlife
Posts: 386
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2001 9:36 am

RE: It's Not The War You Hate

Sun Mar 23, 2003 7:27 am

Teva - To be prefectly frank there is no reason to change the system. The reason for that is no president as ever won the true majority of people. They may have won the majority of voters, but not the majority of people in the US. About 50% of the population actually votes in any general election. And because of our electoral system, the candidates actually have to pay attention to specific states over the inner city. The inner cities have all the population and under a direct voting system, no one would ever give a flying sh*t about Nebraska. They aren't worth anything in pure people. However, in Calirfornia, there are 54 electoral votes. If 15 people voted, whoever got 8 or mote votes would get 54 electorates, 20% of the total they need to become president. Because of this, majority/minority means nothing because you can never actually get a "majority" of people.

-Nick
 
N79969
Posts: 6605
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2002 1:43 am

RE: It's Not The War You Hate

Sun Mar 23, 2003 7:38 am

'Speed, (Also a HM original I believe)

I like it.

I agree with your reasoning about Bush betting the farm on this war because of a sincere conviction. You make an interesting point about the Iraq-terror connection. Although it seems non-existent now, I think we are about to find out more.

I read that after East Germany collapsed and Stasi files were opened up, they discovered that they were supporting the IRA, Carlos the Jackal, and some other terrorists. Prior to that no one really suspected East German involvement in those organizations. Those seemingly bald assertions made by the Bush Administration may turn out to be very true. I would not be surprised.
 
heavymetal
Posts: 4442
Joined: Fri May 08, 2015 3:37 am

RE: It's Not The War You Hate

Sun Mar 23, 2003 8:00 am

If it is proven that Hussien's regime did not support terrorists

I know you're smarter than to presume that after a thorough sweep of every nook and cranny in Iraq, a failure to find substantial terror links is going to be announced by anyone prosecuting this war.

There is terrorism in Iraq (we found that out this morning with the car bomb that killed the journalist and a few others). There is al Qaeda in Iraq. According to Tom Ridge, there's al Qaeda in the US.

The real question here is what to do we do about it? Bush doctrine says we 'shock and awe' the threat, wherever it may be found. I don't disagree with the notion of making that a tactical possibility.

But making it permanent, primary foreign policy is nothing short of insane. By doing so, we light the conflagration that Osama was having wet dreams about on September 10th, 2001. We make it happen.

Aside: My latest thoughts....the cakewalk south is behind em, the menacing snakepit of Baghdad in front of our advancing forces. It's time to imagine this war minus Saddam. We're farther along in the playbook but that doesn't mean there still isn't 50 or 60,000 well fed Saddam fanatics who know their lives aren't worth a sheckle if they surrender in a city and country that wants payback on em. Keep an eye on the stand off in Basra as a an indicator of our plans once we reach Baghdad.
 
Guest

RE: It's Not The War You Hate

Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:16 am

"I know you're smarter than to presume that after a thorough sweep of every nook and cranny in Iraq, a failure to find substantial terror links is going to be announced by anyone prosecuting this war."

You're right, Heavy. I am smarter than that (in my never-to-be-humble opinion). Along with that, I'm pretty much assuming that if terrorist links are proven, then we will definitely hear about it.

'Speed

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: OA412 and 16 guests