Some will say that Jcs, like that sick puppy Indianguy, no doubt. But I have a feeling that even some of the American detractors on here will have to finally admit that the UN was wrong, and, grudgingly, Bush was right on this one, IF this event happens.
Well i'm not going to. Nor am I going to say the Americans deserved it. I do not feel that the existance of any chemical weapons jsutifies the actions, it just proves that the ASSUMPTIONS America made were accurate and nothing more. It does not prove that Iraq was any sort of risk to America and does not legitimise the war.
America knows Iraq *had* these weapons as they sold them many.
So let me ask all those on here that loath the U.S. so much: what WILL be your response if Saddam, that cat with 9 lives, orders the use of WMD's, which many of you said he didn't have, and they're used against Allied troops? What say you then?
Bummer. But surely you knew that he would fight to the death and use whatever he had? I get the impression that some felt the road to Bagdad would be paved in good intentions. How foolish.
Use of tactical nukes? Now THAT is one scary possibility. However, Saddam had been warned that this option remained on the table.
Isn't that admitting that you have WMD and are willing to use them? Doesn't that make a mockery of what this war is supposed to be about? Mind you, there is no doubt in my mind that the US will NOT take this course of action.
Scotty, you're surprised?