Matt D
Topic Author
Posts: 8907
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 1999 6:00 am

Matt D For Governor

Thu Aug 07, 2003 10:16 pm

If I were to run for governor, these are what MY views would be. I believe that this is how we can fix a good many of the problems in what was once The Golden State.

Here are my 30 areas and proposals:

1. Like with Superfly, give a blanket parole to all nonviolent/non thievery criminals. A person that commits a crime against him/herself should not be incarcerated for it.

2. Immediately cut all social programs for illegal aliens. (Basically, enforce Prop 187)

3. Fire all 40,000 new State workers that Mr Davis has hired since he took office in 1999. If we didn't need them then, we don't need them now.

4. Liquidate CalTrans (the bloated, inefficient state highway maintenance agency) and contract all highway/road work to private firms. They will do it better, faster, and cheaper. Also, all road work will only be done between the hours of 2100-0500.

5. Place a 5 year hiatus on all building and development in the state. Projects already under way would be allowed to be finished. But not a single new bulldozer will roll on any California dirt for 5 years. No more houses, warehouses, strip malls, whatever. Rehabilitate existing sites. But no new ground in the state will be allowed to be paved or built over. This state is already got more people than it can handle. Hopefully this will earn me some green votes, especially in light of #6.

6. Screw the Greens. An alternate route to SR 91 WILL be bored through the Santa Ana Canyon. Not to contradict myself with #5, but this road is desperately needed.

7. HOV/"Diamond Lanes" rules will be changed to 2 or more LICENSED DRIVERS per vehicle. Mamma driving little 6 year old Scotty in the Diamond Lane is NOT taking another car off the road, since little Scotty isn't driving anyway.

8. Mandatory reflex testing for all drivers aged 65 and up. Those that don't pass, don't get to drive. Too bad.

9. Noise abatement on cars in residential areas during certain times of the day/night. i.e. anyone who drives a vehicle (so-called 'Rice Rocket' or straight pipe Harley Davidson) in a residential area at-say-2AM, and the sound emitted by the vehicle exceeds 85 dB, that vehicle will be impounded and the driver fined no less than $1000.

10. Eliminate red light cameras. I do not believe that a person should be able to be charged with a crime by a machine.

11. Welfare will be limited to non-renewable terms of 12 weeks. No more of this living generation to generation on it. Welfare cheats, if convicted, will be sentenced to life in prison and/or deportation (if applicable). Same with Workers Compensation. No exceptions for any reason.

12. English only. No exceptions. Can’t read the DMV drivers guide? Too bad. You don’t get a license.

13. Anyone found guilty of driving without a license would be sentenced to a minimum of 1 year prison labor.

14. Cap all traffic citations/tickets at $25, but double the “points” system. Enough of the “good ol’ boy network of bogus tickets. Cities will have to find another way to sustain themselves. The public has been extorted “in the name of safety” for too long now.

15. All sales taxes, property taxes, excise taxes, etc. will be frozen at current levels for 4 years.

16. Eliminate sales tax on private party purchases, inheritances, etc. (e.g. when a vehicle is sold private party)

17. Repeal all helmet laws on motorcycles, except for riders under the age of 18.

18. Lower the legal drinking age to 18, but double all fines and punishments for DUI convictions.

19. Eliminate mandatory insurance laws. But if an uninsured motorist causes death or injury, that party will be taken into state ran servitude to perform community service until that debt is paid off. The state will pay off the injured/killed so that they do not have to wait.

20. Take the educational system out of the political process. All proceeds from Lottery sales that were ostensibly to go to schools will be overseen by a new independent agency that will direct funds directly into the purchase of new textbooks, new schools, and hiring new teachers and increasing incumbent teacher salaries.

21. The losing side of any trial will be required to pay ALL costs for both himself and the other side. This should eliminate a lot of frivolous litigation.

22. All political sponsorship will be limited to $5000 per donor, whether it’s individual or corporation.

23. On abortion: I will not take an official side: Let the two sides continue to hit each other with their signs and leave the rest of us alone.

24. Eliminate so-called “hate crimes” legislation. I believe that term is redundant. An assault, rape, or whatever against an individual is already “hate”. Doubling the sentence because the perpetrator uttered a racial slur is not an excuse. We need to enforce laws already on the books.

25. Charge flat rates for vehicle registration. A car is a car. How much one pays should not be determined by what the car is worth. Although SUV’s and trucks will be charged more inasmuch as they cause more wear on the roads.

26. If the State does not pass a budget within the mandatory timeframe, all who have a vote on the matter will have their pay suspended for every day there’s an impasse.

27. Loosen up a lot of regulations here in the state. Too many businesses are leaving because doing business here has become too onerous and frustrating. A lot of people would be out of work if my plans were adopted. So I would need to lure business back. Of course, a lot of people would also leave the state, which would be good. So those two issues would cancel each other out.

28. Marriage: between a man and a woman only.

29. Crimes of thievery (like burglary, theft, extortion, robbery, etc.), which would no doubt initially skyrocket as a result of me cutting out the bottom on social safety nets, would be met with a MANDATORY 3 year minimum of State Service-trash/graffiti removal, etc.

30. Concealed firearms would be permitted.






[Edited 2003-08-07 15:17:54]
 
An-225
Posts: 3859
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2000 2:55 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Thu Aug 07, 2003 10:36 pm

Sounds good and all, but what's with the marriage policy? Will it hurt your state economy???

Alex.
Money does not bring you happiness. But it's better to cry in your own private limo than on a cold bus stop.
 
UN_B732
Posts: 3529
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2001 12:57 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Thu Aug 07, 2003 10:38 pm

The marriage thing is suitable in Certain States........hint-hint....nudge-nudge.
-UN
What now?
 
saintsman
Posts: 2037
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2002 12:34 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Thu Aug 07, 2003 10:39 pm

Yes, I'm sure those proposals will get you elected.

Not
 
KROC
Posts: 18919
Joined: Mon May 08, 2000 11:19 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Thu Aug 07, 2003 10:43 pm

I was set to award the Shaft for a self-gloss type stuff, but you have some good ideas. I don't agree with number 28 though.
 
707CMF
Posts: 4698
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2002 5:39 pm

RE: Matt D For Governor

Thu Aug 07, 2003 10:54 pm

Just to comment on a few points (most of what you propose is ok, but some of the points shoud be re-read...)

Place a 5 year hiatus on all building and development in the state

That might be good for the environment, however, that will put a lot of construction workers out of a job.
And with point 11. enforced, they might not be too happy to be on an unpaid welfare for 5 years-12 weeks

Welfare will be limited to non-renewable terms of 12 weeks

No way. Although it is true there are system abusers, there are also a ot of people who have great difficulties finding a job. You might want to moderate that point by strictly controlling that a person on the dole is actually looking for a job - if he refuses a job offer for a non valid reason, then the welfare s supressed.

Cap all traffic citations/tickets at $25, but double the “points” system. [...] Cities will have to find another way to sustain themselves.
and then Lower the legal drinking age to 18, but double all fines and punishments for DUI convictions

Well, they won't have to look long for this other way to sustain themselves  Wink/being sarcastic (although I entirely agree with the points heresaid... )

16. Eliminate sales tax on private party purchases, inheritances, etc. (e.g. when a vehicle is sold private party)
No way, that's how the State earns money ! (very high taxation of inheriances...)


Anyway, the other points are quite valid...

Antoine
 
Matt D
Topic Author
Posts: 8907
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 1999 6:00 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Thu Aug 07, 2003 11:04 pm

Well, they won't have to look long for this other way to sustain themselves

I closed that loophole by freezing sales taxes, property taxes, and so on. I know what you mean about "creating" a lot of DUI. I agree that is a potential problem, but it could be worked out.

No way, that's how the State earns money ! (very high taxation of inheriances...)

well you're right. Those ARE cash cows for the state. First, I don't believe in an omnipotent government. It's role should only be to provide law and order and some civility as well as basic services like fire and police protection. Second, I don't believe in taxing people twice on the same dollar. When a new car is purchased, sales tax is paid on it then. When the original owner subsequently sells the car to a second owner, that very same car should not be subject to taxation again. Same goes for inhertiances. When your Aunt Emma die, and leaves you her car and house, those items ALREADY HAD TAX PAID ON THEM.

besides, I believe that with all of this extra money in peoples pockets, they will be spending more, and in the long run, sales taxes from those purchases will be nearly enough to offset the loss of the double tax.


I stand behind the other issues.






[Edited 2003-08-07 16:05:20]
 
bobrayner
Posts: 2038
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 8:03 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Thu Aug 07, 2003 11:19 pm

How do you reconcile proposals 1 and 13?

What's with 17? Are you going for Darwinism?
(IE anybody stupid enough to ride fast without a helet takes themselves out of the gene pool 1.  Smile)
Cunning linguist
 
Matt D
Topic Author
Posts: 8907
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 1999 6:00 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Thu Aug 07, 2003 11:30 pm

How do you reconcile proposals 1 and 13?

Because #1 applies to things like self mutilation, drug usage, etc, where as long as no one else is involved, no real crime has been committed. Whereas #13 would be a statute violation. If someone doesn't have a license, there is a legitimate reason for it-like not being able to read in English, or that it is suspended as a result of a prior crime. Or maybe they failed to pass the test and demonstrate that they are incapable of handling a vehicle safely.

What's with 17? Are you going for Darwinism?

Not necessarily Darwinism per se. Not to contradict myself with the above, but I don't believe that responsibility is something that should be legislated. The difference between riding sans helmet versus driving without a license is that a helmetless person is only going to hurt him/herself whereas an unlicensed driver is either already a criminal or could be potentially putting others in harms way. In other words, I DO believe that NEGLIGENCE should be punished.


 
srbmod
Posts: 15446
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2001 1:32 pm

RE: Matt D For Governor

Thu Aug 07, 2003 11:51 pm

Slight problem with #18, as the Federal gov't requires states to have the legal drinking age set to 21 years old in order to receive Federal Highway funds. The State of Louisiana fought for years with the Feds over this (and their roads suffered as a result), but finally relented.

Some of your points would cause more governmental spending, like #19. Putting those without insurance who cause injury or fatal accidents into State servitude will cost the State more money it cannot afford, and also insurance rates will go up as a result of the large number of uninsured motorists that will be on the roads. #21 will cause more burden on the state because some people will have to go one welfare because all of their income is being used to pay legal costs for both parties in a case in which they were on the losing side. #17 will cause more injury accidents, helmets do save lives, and who will bear the burden of those without medical insurance? The taxpayers.

Some points have some iffy concerns. #7 for example:
7. HOV/"Diamond Lanes" rules will be changed to 2 or more LICENSED DRIVERS per vehicle. Mamma driving little 6 year old Scotty in the Diamond Lane is NOT taking another car off the road, since little Scotty isn't driving anyway.

Maybe it should be changed to "Of driving age" and not "licensed drivers" Some people don't have licences for various reasons (suspension, bad vision, never learned to drive, etc). Mrs. Orange County Soccer Mom, with 2 kids under the age of 16 shouldn't be allowed to use the HOV lanes, because
like you said, little Scotty 6 year old isn't driving anyway.

12. English only. No exceptions. Can’t read the DMV drivers guide? Too bad. You don’t get a license.

This has ACLU lawsuits written all over it. Several municipalities have had these laws overturned by the ACLU, citing 1st Amendment rights. I agree with "English Only" laws, as when one moves to a country where your native language is not the official language, you must learn the language in order to survive. Many school districts that have sizable immigrant populations have had to hire additional staff proficient in other languages in order to meet the needs of non-English speakers. This should not be, English is the offical language in this country, and no other language should be used by any government, from the smallest city to the largest Federal agency.

 
Matt D
Topic Author
Posts: 8907
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 1999 6:00 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Fri Aug 08, 2003 12:06 am

Slight problem with #18, as the Federal gov't requires states to have the legal drinking age set to 21 years old in order to receive Federal Highway funds. The State of Louisiana fought for years with the Feds over this (and their roads suffered as a result), but finally relented.

Well if that's the case, then I might have to re-evaluate the position. But at least I would campaign for the cause. If I end up losing at the Federal level, then oh well. At least I tried.

Some of your points would cause more governmental spending, like #19. Putting those without insurance who cause injury or fatal accidents into State servitude will cost the State more money it cannot afford

Not necessarily. These people will be performing services for "free" that the State would otherwise be paying for, so it would even things out.


and also insurance rates will go up as a result of the large number of uninsured motorists that will be on the roads.

Good point. I would have to address this in my "platform". Stay tuned.

#21 will cause more burden on the state because some people will have to go one welfare because all of their income is being used to pay legal costs for both parties in a case in which they were on the losing side.

Wrong. First of all, if that were the case, then most people will think twice about suing. Does their case have any merit? A person that, under our current system sue for their own stupidity might think twice if they knew there was a chance of it blowing up in their face. Second, welfare would be capped after 12 weeks. If the State has to sieze all of their assetts to make them pay for their legal bills, and they end up living in a box and eating from dumpsters, then that's THEIR problem. It will set a precedent for others to follow.


#17 will cause more injury accidents, helmets do save lives, and who will bear the burden of those without medical insurance?

Again, that's THEIR problem. Those without insurance, oh well. That's the way it goes. My advice to you: drive carefully, drive with a helmet, or get some insurance. You're on your own there.


Maybe it should be changed to "Of driving age" and not "licensed drivers" Some people don't have licences for various reasons (suspension, bad vision, never learned to drive, etc).

I disagree. As I already stated, the original purpose of HOV lanes was to get cars off the road. Whether it's 6 year old Scotty, or a 23 year old college student who got pinched for a DUI, you are NOT taking a car off the road by transporting someone who isn't driving anyway. I stand behind the proposal.


This has ACLU lawsuits written all over it. Several municipalities have had these laws overturned by the ACLU, citing 1st Amendment rights. I agree with "English Only" laws, as when one moves to a country where your native language is not the official language, you must learn the language in order to survive. Many school districts that have sizable immigrant populations have had to hire additional staff proficient in other languages in order to meet the needs of non-English speakers. This should not be, English is the offical language in this country, and no other language should be used by any government, from the smallest city to the largest Federal agency.


hey fuck the ACLU. Let them whine and bitch all they want. We already have the Tower of friggin' Babel here. Again, our purpose is to PROMOTE the welfare, not PROVIDE it. With the amount of resources available nowadays online and in bookstores, learning English should not be a problem. If the parents come here and cannot afford to school their children, then they have no business being here in the first place. Like you said, English is the Common Language, therefore, we have no obligation to cater to those who do not speak it.






 
aa61hvy
Posts: 13021
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 1999 9:21 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Fri Aug 08, 2003 12:18 am

Do you think your sexuality will come into play in the race? I mean you opponents may use your homosexuality against you.
Go big or go home
 
Matt D
Topic Author
Posts: 8907
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 1999 6:00 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Fri Aug 08, 2003 12:25 am

First of all, what does my $exuality have anything to do with it? Second, what makes you think I'm homo? (which, BTW, I'm not).

Look, just because you're a gay, unemployed welfare recipient who drives on a suspended license, and would be crucified by my policy is no reason for you to get bitter or petty.
 
aa61hvy
Posts: 13021
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 1999 9:21 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Fri Aug 08, 2003 12:30 am

Ha, Matthew, Matthew... Where's the sense of humor  Wink/being sarcastic
Go big or go home
 
KROC
Posts: 18919
Joined: Mon May 08, 2000 11:19 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Fri Aug 08, 2003 12:33 am

And down goes AA61hvy. Not in his usual way, but with a punishing blast from Matt D.  Big grin

 
aa61hvy
Posts: 13021
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 1999 9:21 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Fri Aug 08, 2003 12:40 am


You will lose.
Go big or go home
 
pacificjourney
Posts: 2659
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2001 9:12 pm

RE: Matt D For Governor

Fri Aug 08, 2003 12:40 am

Just so long as he does go down we don't care how it happened !

signed all the boys at Toni's bath-house and BBQ, SFO
" Help, help ... I'm being oppressed ... "
 
KROC
Posts: 18919
Joined: Mon May 08, 2000 11:19 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Fri Aug 08, 2003 3:07 am

You gotta love when people bite your style, only to come up a few inches short (as is always the case with AA61hvy).

And I have to admit, I really get a kick out of it when PJ drops the occasional joke. Not sure why, but they work for me.  Big grin
 
User avatar
Jetsgo
Posts: 2701
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2003 6:31 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Fri Aug 08, 2003 4:49 am

Matt D, I couldn't agree with you more. Too bad your not running, you'd definitely get my vote. Only thing different I see is that every year you should be required to take both a written and driving test to prove your knowledge. By doing this, everyone would know more about the legal way of driving and I'm sure it would bring the number of accidents down.

I most agree with you on the issue about CalTrans. They are such sh*t! Here in Sacramento on one of the highways, it needed to be widened from 3 lanes to 4. They said they couldn't begin working on the project until 2007. Well, by then we will need a lot more then just 4 lanes. How pathetic.

Matt D for governor, and maybe president?  Wink/being sarcastic

Chris
Marine Corps Aviation, The Last To Let You Down!
 
donder10
Posts: 6944
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2001 5:29 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Fri Aug 08, 2003 5:26 am

Only thing different I see is that every year you should be required to take both a written and driving test to prove your knowledge. By doing this, everyone would know more about the legal way of driving and I'm sure it would bring

Do you not have a theory exam as part of the driving licence?
 
User avatar
Jetsgo
Posts: 2701
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2003 6:31 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Fri Aug 08, 2003 5:34 am

Here, once you get a license, no more tests. My dad has lived in California for all his life and not had to take a test since he was 16! But, I think when you move from state to state, you have to take a written test. It's rather pathetic considering all the laws being passed that ban this or that. California is definitely run by, I'm not sure how to say it, so ill just say people I don't agree with. Sad
Marine Corps Aviation, The Last To Let You Down!
 
cancidas
Posts: 3985
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 7:34 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Fri Aug 08, 2003 6:36 am

why is it that the people with the really good ideas to make sense of all the bullshit and the realy good plans to make everything work never get to power?!
"...cannot the kingdom of salvation take me home."
 
JA54123
Posts: 128
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2001 11:55 pm

RE: Matt D For Governor

Fri Aug 08, 2003 7:09 am

You have lots of ideas however with no explanations on how to achieve these things, some seem very bad and not well thought out. Some of your proposals would land you with lower ratings than old Governor Gray. Good to have these ideas however, and things are going to have to drastically change for your state (more business friendly, less environmental restriction, and less state run hand-out programs), or it will continue to put a drag on the US economy that the rest of us large states with the big economies cannot overcome by ourselves. We need California, however I think that it is getting some of what the people (not all of them, but a lot of them) deserve. California has always portrayed itself as a state that was perfect when the rest of the country was dealing with problems and adapting to them. California has all of these regulations and restrictions that have caused businesses to leave and consequently it has caused the mess that is currently taking place. I was reading yesterday that California and New York had the largest population losses last year, and that the southern states especially Texas & Florida were experiencing growth. It is going to take strong leadership from people with good ideas like yours to turn it around and retake your state. Good Luck!!

Jason
You wouldn't understand, it's a Texas Thang!
 
Boeing4ever
Posts: 4479
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2001 12:06 pm

RE: Matt D For Governor

Fri Aug 08, 2003 7:39 am

why is it that the people with the really good ideas to make sense of all the bullshit and the realy good plans to make everything work never get to power?!

Because Gay Davis is a sleazebag and the bitch of Special Interests. As Arnie put it: "Gray Davis is good at running a dirty campaign, but he's clearly not good at running a state." Arnold should be careful though...Hollywood could get him.

B4e-Forever New Frontiers
 
Superfly
Posts: 37735
Joined: Thu May 11, 2000 8:01 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Fri Aug 08, 2003 7:09 pm

Matt D:
Now wait a minute! I am supposed to be the liberal and your supposed to be the conservative but I agree with you on most of your agenda.  Smile



1. Like with Superfly, give a blanket parole to all nonviolent/non thievery criminals. A person that commits a crime against him/herself should not be incarcerated for it.

Agreed!
'Rehabilitation centers' should be for the most violent members of our society.

3. Fire all 40,000 new State workers that Mr Davis has hired since he took office in 1999. If we didn't need them then, we don't need them now.

Agreed!
I've been applying for jobs with the State for 4 YEARS now (7 positions) and still no response. State, County and City jobs are all inheritance jobs through nepotism.

4. Liquidate CalTrans (the bloated, inefficient state highway maintenance agency) and contract all highway/road work to private firms. They will do it better, faster, and cheaper. Also, all road work will only be done between the hours of 2100-0500.

Well it's been done already. My company IS the private firm that has the contract with CalTrans and we do all the paperwork involved. The men in the hard hats on the road work 24/7.

5. Place a 5 year hiatus on all building and development in the state. Projects already under way would be allowed to be finished. But not a single new bulldozer will roll on any California dirt for 5 years. No more houses, warehouses, strip malls, whatever. Rehabilitate existing sites. But no new ground in the state will be allowed to be paved or built over. This state is already got more people than it can handle. Hopefully this will earn me some green votes, especially in light of #6.


AMEN!  Big thumbs up

6. Screw the Greens.
I agree!
...and every Democrat should grab-a-hold of every Green Party member, bend them over our knees and spank there asses for voting for Nader and giving the election to W Bush!  Pissed

7. HOV/"Diamond Lanes" rules will be changed to 2 or more LICENSED DRIVERS per vehicle. Mamma driving little 6 year old Scotty in the Diamond Lane is NOT taking another car off the road, since little Scotty isn't driving anyway.

Excellent point  Big thumbs up
I never thought about that and I work as a transportation planner!
Lightbulb goes on in my head. Thanks Matt!  Smile


8. Mandatory reflex testing for all drivers aged 65 and up. Those that don't pass, don't get to drive. Too bad.

Ditto!


9. Noise abatement on cars in residential areas during certain times of the day/night. i.e. anyone who drives a vehicle (so-called 'Rice Rocket' or straight pipe Harley Davidson) in a residential area at-say-2AM, and the sound emitted by the vehicle exceeds 85 dB, that vehicle will be impounded and the driver fined no less than $1000.

Ditto!
So long rice rockets.


10. Eliminate red light cameras. I do not believe that a person should be able to be charged with a crime by a machine.

Agreed!
Time for cops to put down there donuts, stop racial profiling and do there jobs they are supposed to do. Damn those incompetent fu*ks!  Pissed


13. Anyone found guilty of driving without a license would be sentenced to a minimum of 1 year prison labor.

Not sure about that one. People do move and let's face it, people that work at the DMV aren't the most savy people in the world and often don't bother to update the address change that people submit. There are drivers out there that don't know they may have tickets and thus may have a suspended license. I don't think it would be right to send people off to prisons (rehabilitation centers) for tickets they don't know about especially if it was generated by a machine .  Smile

14. Cap all traffic citations/tickets at $25, but double the “points” system. Enough of the “good ol’ boy network of bogus tickets. Cities will have to find another way to sustain themselves. The public has been extorted “in the name of safety” for too long now.

Agreed!
Are laws intended for public saftey or for profits?


18. Lower the legal drinking age to 18, but double all fines and punishments for DUI convictions.

Agreed!
If you can be drafted off to a war, you should be able to have the freedom to buy a beer when/if you get back!

19. Eliminate mandatory insurance laws.

AGREED 100%
It's a money grab for the insurance industry! I am ashamed to say that my state Senator Jackie Spier (D-San Mateo) sponsored that awful legislation that was signed by then Gov. Pete Wilson!  Pissed
I never vote for her! I always vote Libertarian/Indepandant or (gasp) Green when she's up for re-election.


20. Take the educational system out of the political process. All proceeds from Lottery sales that were ostensibly to go to schools will be overseen by a new independent agency that will direct funds directly into the purchase of new textbooks, new schools, and hiring new teachers and increasing incumbent teacher salaries.

Excellent point!

22. All political sponsorship will be limited to $5000 per donor, whether it’s individual or corporation.

Agreed!


26. If the State does not pass a budget within the mandatory timeframe, all who have a vote on the matter will have their pay suspended for every day there’s an impasse.

Makes sense to me.

Of course, a lot of people would also leave the state, which would be good.

Well the bad people (dotcomers) already left. Those who stayed behind truley love the State of California.  Smile










Bring back the Concorde
 
Guest

RE: Matt D For Governor

Fri Aug 08, 2003 8:23 pm

Matty,

I'll vote for you and be your bride on the following conditions:

1. We have a *decent* condo in WeeHo.

2. A mansion in the Palisades (sort of near my work in SM). Holly is vulgar.

3. A Pink Triangle Lane on Santa Monica Boulevard all the way to WeeHo. *gays only*

4. A *convertible only lane* on the Santa Monica Freeway. *yay*

5. Change the Blue Bus to the *Pink Bus*.

That will do for the time being.

mb  Smile
 
Matt D
Topic Author
Posts: 8907
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 1999 6:00 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Fri Aug 08, 2003 9:31 pm

Superfly:

Since we actually agree a lot of this "campaign", does that imply that either you are a closet conservative, or that I am a closet Liberal? Big grin

Mx_Boy:

Anything for you, sweet cheeks.
 
L-188
Posts: 29881
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 1999 11:27 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Fri Aug 08, 2003 9:50 pm

Yeah, Superfly....

You should come over to our side of the force  Acting devilish




.
OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
 
Superfly
Posts: 37735
Joined: Thu May 11, 2000 8:01 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Sun Aug 10, 2003 11:24 am

Matt D:
Nah I think your a closet liberal!  Laugh out loud


The things we agree on aren't specific to any ideology. The manditory insurance laws is something both parties are wrong on. The 'nannyhood' mentality on the left favors it for safety reasons and the conservatives live it because it generates more money for insurance companies. Also, the insurance industry is VERY discriminatory! They charge rates based on race through zip codes , gender, age, marital status and lifestyle choice.
Rates should ONLY be charged based on driving record and/or number of accidents per miles driven.
If a 65 year lady has 1 accident in 1 year and only drives 500 miles a year, and the 17 year guy has 2 accidents in one year but drove 20,000 miles that year, he is a safer driver per miles driven and thus shouldn't pay a higher rate.

Same goes for the helmet law. Democrats and Republicans favored that law but I think it was a good law. Our tax dollars were being wasted on scrapping up human brain guts from the our roads.




Extreme liberals and extreame conservatives agree on a lot of things. Can you believe I agreed with Pat Buchanan 50%?
If you talk away all of his racist White Power, anti-immigrant rhetoric, he actually made a lot of good since. Like him, I am strongly against NAFTA, low tariffs, and putting our military service men and womens lives on the line to protect oil companies.
I liked Buchanan's quote; "Kuwait is not a country, it's an oil company."


You should go for it Matt D! Do you have an extra $3,500 to have you name on a statewide election in this histroic race?
Your name Matt D....... would appear right beneath Gary Coleman. Big grin
Bring back the Concorde
 
Marcus
Posts: 1666
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2001 5:08 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Mon Aug 11, 2003 1:03 pm

Yeah sandwiched between Gary Coleman and Larry Flint
Kids!....we are going to the happiest place on earth...TIJUANA! signed: Krusty the Clown
 
Superfly
Posts: 37735
Joined: Thu May 11, 2000 8:01 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Mon Aug 11, 2003 4:35 pm

Marcus:
Yeah sandwiched between Gary Coleman and Larry Flint

Ew!
Are you sure you still want to run Matt D?
Bring back the Concorde
 
KROC
Posts: 18919
Joined: Mon May 08, 2000 11:19 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Mon Aug 11, 2003 7:48 pm

Throw Arnold in the mix Marcus, and I'm definitely in there.

Signed, Matt D
 
TNboy
Posts: 1115
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2002 8:12 pm

RE: Matt D For Governor

Mon Aug 11, 2003 9:41 pm

Hmmmm - Matty and Mx5 would make a mighty fine pair, surpassing Arnie and Maria, and even rivalling Ronnie and Nancy. (Once Mx5 gets the obligatory nip and tuck of course........ the face, the face!!).
They have my vote.
Cheers
Bill
"...every aircraft is subtly different.."
 
Boeing4ever
Posts: 4479
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2001 12:06 pm

RE: Matt D For Governor

Tue Aug 12, 2003 5:42 am

If you talk away all of his racist White Power, anti-immigrant rhetoric, he actually made a lot of good since. Like him, I am strongly against NAFTA, low tariffs, and putting our military service men and womens lives on the line to protect oil companies.

Amazing, I actually agree on this. I personally find his articles against our slanted support for Israel more appealing. Unfortunately, you do infact have to dig through a lot of shit to get to his good stuff.

B4e-Forever New Frontiers
 
Superfly
Posts: 37735
Joined: Thu May 11, 2000 8:01 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Tue Aug 12, 2003 1:11 pm

Boeing4ever:
I personally find his articles against our slanted support for Israel more appealing.

Really!
I thought he blindly supported Israel.  Confused
I could be wrong on this.
I'd vote for ANYONE who is against Israel even if they are a right-wing nut just out of principle. Our policy towards Israel must STOP!
Now that is government waste at it's worst!
The State of Israel has to be the world's largests 'welfare queen'.  Pissed



MattD:
I certainly hope you made the filing deadline! Big grin
Bring back the Concorde
 
Boeing4ever
Posts: 4479
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2001 12:06 pm

RE: Matt D For Governor

Tue Aug 12, 2003 1:20 pm

Really!

Yes. An article he wrote appeared in a Polish-American newspaper that my dad gets alongside the Chicago Tribune made some mentions about the Iraq war being for the sole purpose of protecting Israel. I thought it was a stretch, but it makes more argumentative sense than the whole OIL BS everyone else sticks to.

Got interested enough to buy a copy of "Conservative American" or something. Forgot it's title and don't know what happened to it since usually I stick to TIME, or Newsweek. Anyway, I do remember that Pat wrote an article along the same lines. He's not really a fan of Dubya in some cases. Perhaps deep down, like all Republicans, he's pissed that McCain had his nomination virtually stolen from him. Then again Pat proved to me that he can be unpredictable in his Conservative policies.

B4e-Forever New Frontiers
 
Continental
Posts: 5222
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2000 3:46 am

RE: Matt D For Governor

Wed Aug 13, 2003 6:30 am

Matt D for governor!?

May God have mercy on our souls........... Sleepy

co

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: aerlingus747, Pihero and 12 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos