User avatar
Aloha717200
Topic Author
Posts: 3739
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 4:50 am

North Korea Making Nuclear Bombs

Thu Oct 02, 2003 5:15 pm

N. Korea Says It Is Making Nuclear Bombs

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20031002/ap_on_re_as/koreas_nuclear&cid=516&ncid=716

SEOUL, South Korea - North Korea (news - web sites) said Thursday it has completed reprocessing its 8,000 spent nuclear fuel rods and is using plutonium extracted from them to make atomic bombs.


"The (North) successfully finished the reprocessing of some 8,000 spent fuel rods," a spokesman for North Korea's Foreign Ministry said in a statement carried by the North's official news agency, KCNA. The spokesman was not named.


Accusing the United States of taking a "hostile policy" toward the North, the statement said that North Korea "made a switchover in the use of plutonium churned out by reprocessing spent fuel rods in the direction increasing its nuclear deterrent force."


North Korea also said it will reprocess more spent fuel rods to be produced from the small reactor in its main nuclear complex in Yongbyon, north of Pyongyang.


Earlier this week, North Korea claimed that it was taking "practical measures" to boost its nuclear weapons program as a deterrent against what it calls a U.S. plan to invade.


The claim came as some U.S. intelligence analysts are becoming increasingly concerned that the communist regime may have three, four or even six nuclear weapons instead of the one or two the CIA (news - web sites) had estimated.


New atomic bombs would give Pyongyang more authority at the negotiating table, and may allow it to part with one, either in a test or by selling it, experts say.


The United States and its allies are trying to persuade North Korea to give up its nuclear programs. The North says it will do so only if the United States signs a nonaggression treaty, provides economic aid and opens diplomatic ties.


The nuclear dispute flared in October 2002 when U.S. officials said North Korea admitted running a secret nuclear weapons program in violation of international agreements.
----------------------------------------


Looks like thinks are heating up. I'm seriously wondering what the eventual response to North Korea is going to be from the international community. In all honesty, their government is certainly getting threatening, but I don't think it'd be a good idea for the USA to sign a non agression pact with north korea. I'm not in favor of going to war with them of course, but signing a non agression pact could bite us in the rear in the future, for sure.

[Edited 2003-10-02 10:17:22]
 
lehpron
Posts: 6846
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2001 3:42 am

RE: North Korea Making Nuclear Bombs

Thu Oct 02, 2003 5:42 pm

Awe how cute, somebody is feeling left out and needs a hug...
The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
 
cfalk
Posts: 10221
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2000 6:38 pm

RE: North Korea Making Nuclear Bombs

Thu Oct 02, 2003 11:11 pm

Non-agression pacts are made to be broken, judging from history.

The North Korean government will eventually fall. This is a historical certainty. The only question is whether or not it will go quietly or whether it will insist on taking others with them.

Charles
The only thing you should feel when shooting a terrorist: Recoil.
 
Alpha 1
Posts: 12343
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 12:12 am

RE: North Korea Making Nuclear Bombs

Thu Oct 02, 2003 11:13 pm

Well, they have WMD's, so why aren't we invading them? What's good for the goose is good for the gander, right? (dripping with sarcasm).
 
User avatar
yyz717
Posts: 15699
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:26 pm

RE: North Korea Making Nuclear Bombs

Fri Oct 03, 2003 5:14 am

The US should consider a lightning attack on NK's nuclear program. If it comes to fruition, n-bombs will be sold by NK to rogue regimes thru-out the Middle East.

I dumped at the gybe mark in strong winds when I looked up at a Porter Q400 on finals. Can't stop spotting.
 
ConcordeBoy
Posts: 16852
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2001 8:04 am

RE: North Korea Making Nuclear Bombs

Fri Oct 03, 2003 5:19 am

Care would have to be taken in any sort of invasion... if a nuke detonated in N.Korea during a destruction raid: the fallout radius could make the entire Korean peninsula (plus parts of Japan and China) practically uninhabitable!
Faire du ciel le plus bel endroit de la terre c'est impossible sans Concorde!
 
User avatar
EA CO AS
Posts: 13645
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 8:54 am

RE: North Korea Making Nuclear Bombs

Fri Oct 03, 2003 5:20 am

Well, they have WMD's, so why aren't we invading them?

All sarcasm aside, what's your stance on the DPRK's attempts at building a nuclear arsenal, Alpha 1? Do you think we should level these facilities militarily, or should we just shrug and say, "Hey, they can do what they want," ?

Or do we cave in and give in to their blackmail in exchange for them getting out of the nuclear weapons business entirely?

Seriously. I'd like to know your solution.
"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan

Comments made here are my own and are not intended to represent the official position of Alaska Air Group
 
User avatar
yyz717
Posts: 15699
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:26 pm

RE: North Korea Making Nuclear Bombs

Fri Oct 03, 2003 5:23 am

Care would have to be taken in any sort of invasion... if a nuke detonated in N.Korea during a destruction raid: the fallout radius could make the entire Korean peninsula (plus parts of Japan and China) practically uninhabitable!

I agree, but the option of not invading and allowing NK to develop N-weapons could be worse.
I dumped at the gybe mark in strong winds when I looked up at a Porter Q400 on finals. Can't stop spotting.
 
User avatar
EA CO AS
Posts: 13645
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 8:54 am

RE: North Korea Making Nuclear Bombs

Fri Oct 03, 2003 5:32 am

if a nuke detonated in N.Korea during a destruction raid

A nuclear weapon would not detonate as a result of conventional weaponry destroying it. It takes a very controlled chain reaction to trigger an atomic detonation.

Also, if the DPRK does have some weaponry, they're of the low-yield (less than 20KT) variety, a-la the Fat Man and Little Boy designs. Fallout would not be a huge event in the region, although there would be some near the blast site.

Only a HYDROGEN device is capable of a thermonuclear detonation that would result in large yields (greater than 1MT) and the large fallout plumes that accompany them.
"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan

Comments made here are my own and are not intended to represent the official position of Alaska Air Group
 
cfalk
Posts: 10221
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2000 6:38 pm

RE: North Korea Making Nuclear Bombs

Fri Oct 03, 2003 6:15 am

Alpha 1,

Iraq was suspected of having chemical and biological weapons on short, battlefield-range weapons in a (relatively) sparsely-populated region. North Korea is known to have nuclear weapons and other WMDs, and is also known strategic-range missiles to carry them. It is arguable that the Iraqi WMD threat was more manageable in terms of limiting the risk to the populations of surrounding countries, than that in North Korea, where "Dear Leader" can choose to kill 50 million people at any time.

Charles
The only thing you should feel when shooting a terrorist: Recoil.
 
UAL747
Posts: 6725
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 1999 5:42 am

RE: North Korea Making Nuclear Bombs

Fri Oct 03, 2003 9:23 am

"Well, they have WMD's, so why aren't we invading them? What's good for the goose is good for the gander, right? (dripping with sarcasm)."

Alpha 1,

You and I see pretty much eye-to-eye on the Bush administration, but I have to stray a bit here.

North Korea is an ENTIRELY different animal than Iraq is. First of all, it's got a highly developed army with many more capabilities than the one in Iraq. Secondly, you have South Korea to defend, which will likely bare the brunt of the attack. You also have to consider the relationship North Korea has with China, and how all this will affect Japan. This one, the administration has to be much more cautious about. We think we are having a lot of casualties in Iraq, North Korea would make Iraq look like a day in the park, unfortunately.

Political pressure is still a viable way to deal with them at this point. I honestly think the Bush administration isn't ignoring this threat, and they are doing things, although secretly, to ward off any N. Korean agression.

UAL747

"Bangkok Tower, United 890 Heavy. Bangkok Tower, United 890 Heavy.....Okay, fine, we'll just turn 190 and Visual Our Way

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AirstairFear, Dreadnought, Hillis, KLDC10, moo, qf789, santi319, WIederling and 37 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos